The authors propose a framework for teacher preparation programs that aims to help prospective teachers learn how to teach from studying teaching. The framework is motivated by their interest in defining a set of competencies that provide a deliberate, systematic path to becoming an effective teacher over time. The framework is composed of four skills, rooted in the daily activity of teaching, that when deployed deliberately and systematically, constitute a process of creating and testing hypotheses about cause-effect relationships between teaching and learning during classroom lessons. In spite of the challenges of acquiring these skills, the authors argue that the framework outlines a more realistic and more promising set of beginning teacher competencies than those of traditional programs designed to produce graduates with expert teaching strategies.
Ball, D. L. (1999). Crossing boundaries to examine the mathematics entailed in elementary teaching. Contemporary Mathematics, 243, 15-36.
2.
Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
3.
Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. N. Mangiere & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161-186). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
4.
Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 194-222.
5.
Borko, H., Livingston, C., McCaleb, J., & Mauro, L. (1988). Student teachers’ planning and post-lesson reflections: Patterns and implications for teacher preparation. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 65-83). London: Falmer.
6.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Macmillan.
7.
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
8.
Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.
9.
Brownell, W. A. (1935). Psychological considerations in the learning and teaching of arithmetic. In W. D. Reeve (Ed.), The teaching of arithmetic: Tenth yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 1-31). New York: Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.
10.
Burnaford, G., Fischer, J., & Hobson, D. (Eds.). (1996). Teachers doing research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Carlsen, W. S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 471-481.
12.
Carlsen, W. S. (1997). Never ask a question if you don’t know the answer: The tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 14-23.
13.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (Eds.). (1993). Inside/out-side: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher researcher movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25.
15.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Cruickshank, D., & Applegate, J. (1980). Reflective teaching as a strategy for teacher growth. Educational Leadership, 38, 553-554.
17.
Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of a science of education. New York: Horace Liveright.
18.
Evertson, C., Hawley, W. D., & Zlotnick, M. (1985). Making a difference in educational quality through teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(13), 2-12.
19.
Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
Fernandez, C., & Cannon, J. (2005). What Japanese and U.S. teachers think about when constructing mathematics lessons: A preliminary investigation. Elementary School Journal, 105, 481-498.
21.
Floden, R., & Meniketti, M. (2005). Research on the effects of coursework in the arts and sciences and in the foundations of education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 261-308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (1998). Understanding teachers’ self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 67-80.
23.
Goldenberg, C., Saunders, B., & Gallimore, R. (2004). Settings for change: A practical model for linking rhetoric and action to improve achievement of diverse students (Final Report to the Spencer Foundation: Grant #199800042). Long Beach: California State University-Long Beach.
24.
Hawkins, D. (1973). What it means to teach. Teachers College Record, 75(1), 7-16.
25.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one?Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
26.
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
27.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An “experiment” model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 201-222.
28.
Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3-20.
29.
Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330-351.
30.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
31.
Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235.
32.
Kennedy, M. (1999). The problem of evidence in teacher education. In R. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 87-107). London: Falmer.
33.
Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75-95.
35.
Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1997). Planned educational change in Japan: The shift to student-centered elementary science. Journal of Educational Policy, 12, 313-331.
36.
Linn, M. C., & Swiney, J. F. (1981). Individual differences in formal thought: Role of expectations and aptitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 274-286.
37.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Malara, N. A., & Zan, R. (2002). The problematic relationship between theory and practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 553-580). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teachers plan? The nature of planning and influences on it. Elementary School Journal, 81, 4-23.
42.
Morris, A. K. (in press). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
43.
Moshman, D. (2005). Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
45.
Nemser, S. F. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 150-170). New York: Longman.
46.
Osterman, K. P., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2004). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
47.
Paine, L., & Ma, L. (1994). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 675-697.
48.
Raths, J. D., & McAninch, A. C. (Eds.). (1999). Advances in teacher education: Vol. 5. What counts as knowledge in teacher education?Stamford, CT: Ablex.
49.
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23-55.
50.
Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (in press). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
51.
Saunders, W., & Goldenberg, C. (in press). The contribution of settings to school improvement and school change: A case study. In C. R. O’Donnell & L. Yamauchi (Eds.), Culture and context in human behavior change: Theory, research, and applications. New York: Peter Lang.
52.
Schaefer, R. J. (1967). The school as the center of inquiry. New York: Harper & Row.
53.
Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 119-150.
54.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
55.
Smith, E. E., & Osherson, D. N. (1995). Thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
Spillane, J. P., & Jennings, N. E. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: Exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98, 449-481.
57.
Stein, M. K., Baxter, J. A., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 639-663.
58.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
59.
Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-576.
61.
Wheatley, K. F. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 5-22.
62.
Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study: An ethnographic investigation of school-based teacher development in Japan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
63.
Zahorik, J. A. (1970). The effect of planning on teaching. Elementary School Journal, 71, 143-151.
64.
Zeichner, K. M., & Conklin, H. G. (2005). Teacher education programs. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 645-735). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
