Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Cook School District is a Web-based simulation designed to allow teacher candidates an opportunity to explore connections between their actions as teachers and the learning and engagement of simulated students. The simulation provides a setting in which to practice the processes inherent in teacher work sample methodology (TWSM). The outcomes of TWSM include analyzing the context in which teaching and learning will occur; identifying outcomes to be learned; designing and administering a pretest to evaluate prior knowledge; designing and delivering instruction, differentiating curriculum, instruction, and/or assessment as appropriate; and postassessing student learning to determine the “value added” or teacher effects on learning and engagement. Quasi-experimental research demonstrates the efficacy of the simulation to (a) improve scores on a real teacher work sample, (b) improve field-based lesson teaching performance, and (c) affect users’ perceptions of their skillfulness and valuing of concepts underlying teacher work sample methodology.

Keywords

simulation teacher education teacher work sample teacher learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, M. (2003). Eight questions on teacher preparation: What does the research say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

Andersen, D. W. , & Antes, J. M. (1971). Micro-teaching for preparing teachers of culturally diverse children. Elementary School Journal, 72, 142-149.

Brown, J. S. , Collins, A. , & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Taking stock in 2004: Teacher education in dangerous times. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 3-7.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2005a). No child left behind: 3 years and counting. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 99-103.

Cochran-Smith, M. (Ed.). (2005b). The politics of teacher education [Special issue]. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3).

Cochran-Smith, M. , & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69-109). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Collins, A. , Brown, J. S. , & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making things visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11, 38-46.

Elliott, E. (2004). Student learning in NCATE accreditation. Quality Teaching, 1(3), 4-5.

10.

Elmore, R. F. (2003). The challenge of accountability: A plea for strong practice. Educational Leadership, 61(3), 6-10.

11.

Gage, N. L. (1978). The scientific basis of the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

12.

Girod, G. (Ed.). (2001). Connecting teaching and learning. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

13.

Greeno, J. G. , Collins, A. M. , & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.

14.

Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15.

McConney, A. , & Ayres, R. (1998). Assessing student teachers’ assessments. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 140-150.

16.

Popham, W. J. (2005). All about accountability/instructional quality: Collecting credible evidence. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 80-81.

17.

Putnam, R. T. , & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.

18.

Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 17, 13-20.

19.

Sanders, W. , & Horn, S. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.

20.

Schalock, H. D. , & Myton, D. (2002). Connecting teaching and learning: An introduction to teacher work sample methodology. In G. Girod (Ed.), Connecting teaching and learning: A handbook for teacher educators on teacher work sample methodology (pp. 5-31). Washington, DC: AACTE.

21.

Schalock, H. D. , Schalock, M. D. , & Myton, D. (1998). Effectiveness along with quality should be the focus. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 468-470.

22.

Schalock, M. (1998). Accountability, student learning, and the preparation and licensure of teachers: Oregon’s teacher work sample methodology. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 269-285.

23.

Wasley, P. A. , & McDiarmid, W. G. (2003, July). Tying the assessment of new teachers to student learning and to teacher preparation. Unpublished paper prepared for the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future meeting, Denver, CO.

24.

Wilson, S. , Floden, R. , & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle: University of Washington Center for the Student of Teaching and Policy.

25.

Wright, S. , Horn, S. , & Sanders, W. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.

Exploring the Efficacy of the Cook School District Simulation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References