Abell Foundation. (2001, October). Teacher certification reconsidered: Stumbling for quality. Retrieved November 1, 2001, from http://www.abell.org
2.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence?Teachers College Record, 102, 5-27.
3.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
4.
Christensen, D. (1996). The professional knowledgeresearch base for teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education(2nd ed., pp. 38-52). New York: Macmillan.
5.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2002). Bringing evidence-driven progress to education: Arecommended strategy for the U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Council for Excellence in Government.
6.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or for worse?Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-17.
7.
Cochran-Smith, M.,& Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Paradigms and politics. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence. Teachers College Record, 102, 28-56.
9.
Eisenhart, M. (2005). Science plus: A response to the responses to scientific research in education. Teachers College Record, 107, 52-58.
10.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods on research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
11.
Erickson, F. (2005). Arts, humanities and sciences in educational research and social engineering in federal education policy. Teachers College Record, 107, 4-9.
12.
Fallon, D. (in press). The buffalo upon the chimneypiece: The value of evidence. Journal of Teacher Education.
13.
Goodlad, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation's schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Hess, F. (2001). Tear down this wall: The case for a radical overhaul of teacher certification. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
15.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
16.
Kennedy, M. (1999). The problem of evidence in teacher education. In R. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers(pp. 87-107). London: Falmer.
17.
Lagemann, E. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Lanier, J.,& Little, J. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed., pp. 527-569). New York: Macmillan.
19.
Lather, P. (2004). This is your father's paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 15-34.
20.
Massell, D. (2001). Theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects. In S. Fuhrman(Ed.), 100th yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, from the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states(pp. 148-169). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Murray, F. (2005). On building a unified system of accreditation in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 307-317.
22.
National Research Council. (2001). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23.
Nelson, R. (2003). On the uneven evolution of human know-how. Research Policy, 32, 909-922.
24.
Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In W. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
25.
Stone, D. (1997). The policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
26.
Trinder, L. (2000). A critical appraisal of evidence-based practice. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidencebased practice, a critical appraisal(pp. 212-241). London: Blackwell Science.
27.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). The secretary's fourth annual report on teacher quality: Ahighly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education.
28.
Weiss, C. (2001). What to do until the random assigner comes. In F. Mosteller & R. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters, randomized trials in education research(pp. 198-224). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
29.
Whitehurst, G. (2002, March). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Paper presented at the White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers, Washington, DC.
30.
Williams, B., Mitchell, A., & Leibbrand, J. (2003). Navigating change: Preparing for a performance-based accreditation review. Washington, DC: National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.