Cochran-Smith, M. (Ed.). (in press). Promises and politics: Images of research in the discourse of teacher education. Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
2.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. K. (2002). The discourse of reform in teacher education: Extending the dialogue. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 26-29.
3.
Cochran-Smith, M.,& Fries, K. (in press). The AERAPanel on Research and Teacher Education: Introduction. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Decker, P., Mayer, D., & Glazerman, S. (2004). The effects of Teach For America on students: Findings from a national evaluation(MPR Reference No: M-8792-750). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
5.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37).
6.
Porter-Magee, K. (2004, June 21). The effects of Teach for America on students: Findings from a national evaluation. Education Gadfly. Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/gadfly
7.
Raymond, M., Fletcher, S. H., & Luque, J. (2001). Teach for America: An evaluation of teacher differences and student outcomes in Houston, Texas. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
8.
Southeast Center for Teaching Quality. (2004). Teach for America study reports some gains, but obscures failed teaching policies in urban schools. Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://www.teachingquality.org/resources/html/TFA_Report.htm
9.
Zeichner, K., & Conklin, H. (in press). Teacher education programs. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of theAERAPanel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
