To date, the professional development school (PDS) preservice teacher preparation literature base is long on attitudinal analysis and short on comparative analysis of outcome variables. This article reports on a 2-year study comparing the lesson planning, teaching effectiveness, postlesson reflectivity, and content retention of professional teaching knowledge for teachers prepared at a PDS or campus-based program. The teaching outcome variables were rubric scored by experienced raters blind to participants' preparation program. Although the scores of PDS-prepared student teachers consistently trended higher than the campus-prepared cohort, no statistically significant differences were found. However, during the 1st year of teaching, PDS-prepared teachers scored significantly higher than campus-prepared teachers on teaching effectiveness. Potential explanations for the findings are provided.
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Professional development schools: Weighing the evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2.
Blocker, S. L., & Mantle-Bromley, C. (1997). PDS verses campus preparation: Through the eyes of the students. Teacher Educator, 33(2), 70-89.
3.
Book, C. L. (1996). Professional development schools. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education(2nd ed., pp. 194-210). New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
Cobb, J. B. (2001). Graduates of professional development school programs: Perceptions of the teacher as change agent. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 89-107.
5.
Fountain, C.,& Evans, D. (1994). Beyond shared rhetoric: A collaborative change model for integrating preservice and inservice urban education delivery systems. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 218-228.
6.
Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 85, 281-314.
7.
Fuller, F., & Brown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education(74th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 25-52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Hayes, H. A., & Wetherill, K. S. (1996, April). A new vision for schools, supervision, and teacher education: The professional development system and Model Clinical Teaching Project. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
9.
Houston, W. R., Clay, D., Hollis, L. Y., Ligons, C., Roff, L.,& Lopez, N. (1995). Strength through diversity: Houston Consortium of Professional Development and Technology Centers. Houston, TX: University of Houston, College of Education.
10.
Houston, W. R., Hollis, L. Y., Clay, D., Ligons, C.,& Roff, L. (1999). Effects of collaboration on urban teacher education programs and professional development schools. In D. Byrd & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Research on professional development schools: Vol. 7. Teacher education(pp. 6-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
Mantle-Bromley, C. (2001, April). The status of early theories of professional development school potential: Progress of four settings across the United States. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
12.
Meece, J. (2002). Child and adolescent development for educators(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Neubert, G. A., & Binko, J. B. (1998). Professional development schools: The proof is in the performance. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 44-46.
14.
Patterson, J. H. (2000, November). Impact of professional development schools on teacher education. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.
15.
Rasch, K., & Finch, M. E. (1996). Who are our partners? Reconceptualizing teaching and stewardship. In T. Warren (Ed.), Partnerships in teacher education(pp. 135-142). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
16.
Ross, F. (2001, April). So what type of teachers are they? Graduates of a PDS teacher preparation program 3-6 years later. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
17.
Sandholtz, J. H.,& Dadlez, S. H. (2000). Professional development school trade-offs in teacher preparation and renewal. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27, 7-27.
18.
Sharpe, T., Lounsbery, M. F., Golden, C., & Deibler, C. (1999). Analysis of an ongoing, district-wide approach to teacher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 79-96.
19.
Stallings, J. A. (1991, April). Connecting preservice teacher education and inservice professional development: A professional development school. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
20.
Teitel, L. (2001). How professional development schools make a difference: Areview of research. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.
21.
Thompson, R., & Ross, F. (2000). Becoming a teacher in a professional development school. Teaching and Change, 8, 31-50.
22.
Trachtman, R. (1996). The NCATE professional development school study: A survey of 28 PDS sites. Unpublished manuscript. (Available fromProfessional Development School Standards Project, National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, Washington, DC 20036.
23.
Tusin, L. (1995). Success in the first year of teaching: Effects of a clinical experience program. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Detroit, MI.
24.
Wait, D. B. (2000). Are professional development school trained teachers really better?Paper presented at theannual meeting of the National PDS Conference, Columbia, SC.
25.
Wait, D. B., & Warren, L. L. (2001). Are professional development school trained teachers better classroom managers?East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451156)
26.
Walling, B., & Lewis, M. (2000). Development of professional identity among professional development school preservice teachers: Longitudinal and comparative analysis. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2), 65-72.
27.
Yerian, S.,& Grossman, P. L. (1997). Preservice teacher perceptions of their middle level teacher education experience: A comparison of a traditional and a PDS model. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24, 85-101.
