Retention of a competent teaching force is a growing concern among the nation’s educators and policy makers. Providing new teachers with quality induction programs may mitigate significant teacher attrition and teacher staffing issues now facing many school districts in the United States. This article reports positive results in the long-term retention of novice teachers who participated in an induction partnership jointly administered by the University of Colorado and six school districts. The study tracks 10 cohorts of inductees into their 5th year of teaching and researches components of the program that impact retention. The article also describes program characteristics— initially developed from prior research and refined by data from ongoing program evaluations— that have proven effective in raising teacher competence and retention rates. Finally, the author suggests how this induction research might inform the decisions of local and national policy makers.
Boe, E., Bobbitt, S., Cook, L., Whitener, S., & Weber, A. (1996). Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers: Data from the 1989 teacher follow-up survey (NCES Working paper series No. 96-12). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED417159)
2.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Paris, C. (1995). Mentor and mentoring: Did Homer have it right? In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical discourses on teacher development(pp. 181-202). London: Cassell.
3.
Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (1994). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
4.
Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B. T., Haselkorn, D., & Fideler, E. (1999). Teacher recruitment, selection, and induction: Policy influences on the supply and quality of teachers. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession(pp. 183-232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R.,& Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 286-302.
6.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. M. (1996). Who teaches and why: Dilemmas of building a profession for twenty-first century schools. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education(2nd ed., pp. 67-101). New York: Macmillan.
7.
Elmore, R. F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
8.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teacher’s College Record, 103, 1013-1055.
9.
Fideler, E. F., & Haselkorn, D. (1999). Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers, Inc.
10.
Fullan, M. (2002). The new meaning of educational change(3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery,& E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.
12.
Gratch, A. (1998). Beginning teacher and mentor relationships. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 220-227.
13.
Grissmer, D. W., & Kirby, S. N. (1987). Teacher attrition: The uphill climb to staff the nation’s schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
14.
Grissmer, D. W., & Kirby, S. N. (1992). Patterns of attrition among Indiana teachers, 1965-1987. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
15.
Henke, R., Chen, X., & Geis, S. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-1993 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997 (NCES 2000-152). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16.
Heyns, B. (1988). Educational defectors: A first look at teacher attrition in the NLS-72 (1988). Educational Researcher, 17(3), 24-32.
17.
Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 173-180.
18.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2000). Adifferent approach to solving the teacher shortage problem. Policy Perspective, 2(2), 1-6.
19.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
20.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2002, June). The teacher shortage: Acase of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86, 16-31.
21.
Moir, E., & Baron, W. (2002). Looking closely, every step of the way. Journal of Staff Development, 23(4), 54-56.
22.
Molner, L. A. (1993). Partners in Education annual report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
23.
Molner, L. A. (1994). Partners in Education annual report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
24.
Molner, L. A. (1995). Partners in Education annual report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
25.
Molner, L. A. (1996). Partners in Education annual report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
26.
Molner, L. A.,& Killion, J. P. (1989). Aschool-university collaboration that works. Journal of Staff Development, 10(2), 26-31.
27.
Moskowitz, J.,& Stephens, M. (1997). From students of teaching to teachers of students(APEC No. 97-HR-01.1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28.
Murnane, R. J., Singer, J. D., Willet, J. B., Kemple, J. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. New York: Author.
30.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. New York: Author.
31.
Oakes, J., Franke, M., Quartz, K., & Rogers, J. (2002). Research for high-quality urban teaching: Defining it, developing it, assessing it. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 228-233.
32.
Odell, S. J., & Ferraro, D. P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 200-204.
33.
Renard, L. (1999). Ask not what your school can do for you, but what you can do for you. In M. Scherer (Ed.), Abetter beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers(pp. 225-232). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
34.
Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35.
Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
