This study used a prototype view of teaching as a theoretical framework to interpret, analyze, and describe the behaviors and verbal responses of three expert teachers and to determine the degree to which these three teachers share a “family resemblance” to one another. A case study that provides descriptions of what expert teachers do and say contributes to our understanding of the complexity of expertise in teaching. Analysis of data collected for this study reveals six central tendencies of the three participants. The rich descriptions and summary representations provide specific and complex profiles to inform teacher educators and professional development providers in their efforts to improve professional practice among teachers.
Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Berliner, D. C. (1988, February). The development of expertise in pedagogy. Charles W. Hunt Memorial Lecture presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA, February 17-20, 1988. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 298122)
3.
Campbell, K. P. (1990-1991, Winter). Personal norms of experienced expert suburban high school teachers: Implications for selecting and retaining outstanding individuals. Action in Teacher Education, 12, 35-40.
4.
Carter, K. , Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, P., & Berliner, D. C. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice, and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 147-157.
5.
Chase, W. G. , & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215-281). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Chi, M. T. H. , Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
Cushing, K. S. , Sabers, D. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1992, Spring). Olympic goals: Investigations of expertise in teaching. Educational Horizons, 108-114.
8.
de Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice and chess. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1946)
9.
Fehr, B. (1993). How do I love thee? Let me consult my prototype. In S. Duck (Ed.), Individuals in relationships (pp. 87-120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Feltovich, P. J. , Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (1997). Expertise in context. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
11.
Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93-104.
12.
Gonzalez, L. E. , & Carter, K., (1996). Correspondence in cooperating teachers’ and student teachers’ interpretations of classroom events. Teacher & Teacher Education, 12, 39-47.
13.
Hattie, J. , Jaeger, R., Strahan, D., & Baker, W. (1998). Report on the development of the assessment/data collection instruments and protocols. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Educational Research at Evaluation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
14.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 63-100). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Livingston, C. , & Borko, H. (1990). High school mathematics review lessons: Expert-novice distinctions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 372-387.
16.
Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking.
17.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Noice, T. , & Noice, H. (1997). The nature of expertise in professional acting: A cognitive view. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
20.
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.) Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 112-144). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57,1-22.
25.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Sternberg, R. J. , & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9-17.
27.
Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Swanson, H. L. , O’Connor, J. E., & Cooney, J. B. (1990, Fall). An information processing analysis of expert and novice teachers’ problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 533-556.
29.
van der Mars, H. , Vogler, E. W., Darst, P. W., & Cusimano, B. (1991). Novice and expert physical education teachers: They may think and decide differently... but do they behave differently? Paper presented at the American Educational Researcher Association National Conference, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED 336 354)
30.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
