Urban schools are challenged to improve teacher retention and quality. Unfortunately, research on effective teaching and attributes of effective teachers rarely has considered urban contextual influences. The purposes of the current study were (a) to develop and validate an instrument for evaluating urban teacher attributes and (b) to determine whether teacher attributes identified by the instrument varied according to teaching effectiveness. This instrument then could be used as a diagnostic tool with incoming education students to measure personal attributes related to urban teaching success. Phase 1 of the study defined a set of factors based on participants’ responses to questionnaire items. Phase 2 examined whether participants’ responses could be used to classify teachers based on teaching effectiveness. Analysis of the teachers’ responses revealed that the teacher attributes were not associated only with effective urban teaching. Possible explanations for the differences between the results of the current study and previous research are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abt-Perkins, D., & Gomez, M. L. (1993). A good place to begin: Examining our personal perspectives. Language Arts, 70(3), 193-206.
2.
Alkin, M. (Ed.). (1992). Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., Vol. 4). New York: Macmillan.
3.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (1990). RATE IV. Teaching teachers: Facts and figures. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 328 550)
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Basom, M., Rush, T., & Machell, J. (1994). Pre-service identification of talented teachers through non-traditional measures: A study of the role of affective variables as predictors of success in student teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(2), 47-57.
6.
Blanck, G. (1990). Vygotsky: The man and his cause. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 31-58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brookhart, S., & Rusnak, T. (1993). A pedagogy of enrichment, not poverty: Successful lessons of exemplary urban teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 17-26.
8.
Chester, M., & Beaudin, B. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 233-257.
Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1978). Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward (pp. 205-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Deci, E. L., & Porac, J. (1978). Cognitive evaluation theory and the study of human motivation. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of reward (pp. 149-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Dejnozka, E., & Kapel, D. (Eds.). (1991). American educator’s encyclopedia. New York: Greenwood.
13.
de Vaus, D. (1986). Surveys in social research. London: George Allen & Unwin.
14.
Foster, M. (1993). Educating for competence in community and culture: Exploring the views of exemplary African-American teachers. Urban Education, 27(4), 370-394.
15.
Gay, G. (1995). Modeling and mentoring in urban teacher preparation. Education and Urban Society, 28(1), 103-118.
16.
Guskey, T., & Passaro, P. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627-643.
17.
Guyton, E., & Hidalgo, F. (1995). Characteristics, responsibilities, and qualities of urban school mentors. Education and Urban Society, 28(1), 40-47.
18.
Haberman, M. (1993). Predicting the success of urban teachers (the Milwaukee trials). Action in Teacher Education, 15(3), 1-5.
19.
Haberman, M. (1995). Selecting “star” teachers for children and youth in urban poverty. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(10), 777-781.
20.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Hebert, E., Lee, A., & Williamson, L. (1998). Teachers’ and teacher education students’ sense of efficacy: Quantitative and qualitative comparisons. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 31(4), 214-225.
22.
Ilmer, S., Snyder, J., Erbaugh, S., & Kurz, K. (1997). Urban educators’ perceptions of successful teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 379-384.
23.
Jamieson, A., Curry, A., & Martinez, G. (1999). School enrollment in the United States: Social and economic characteristics of students (current population reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at www.census.gov/prod/2001/pubs/P20-533.pdf
24.
Kindler, A. (2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 1999-2000 summary report. National Clearing-house for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. Washington, DC: George Washington University. Available at www.ncela.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/seareports/99-00/sea9900.pdf
25.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491.
27.
Marso, R., & Pigge, F. (1997). A longitudinal study of persisting and nonpersisting teachers’ academic and personal characteristics. Journal of Experimental Education, 65(3), 243-254.
28.
McCutcheon, J., Schmidt, C., & Bolden, S. (1991). Relationships among selected personality variables, academic achievement and student teaching behavior. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 24(3), 38-44.
29.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (1999). Guidelines for performance-based teacher evaluation. Jefferson City, MO: Author.
30.
Mueller, D. (1986). Measuring social attitudes. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from www.nctaf.org/dream/dream.html
32.
National Education Association. (1997). Status of the American public school teacher, 1995-1996: Highlights. NEA Research. Retrieved February 3, 2003, from www.nea.org/neatoday/9709/status.html
33.
Peterson, K., Bennet, B., & Sherman, D. (1991). Themes of uncommonly successful teachers of at-risk students. Urban Education, 26(2), 176-194.
34.
Robinson, J., Shaver, P., & Wrightsman, L. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35.
Schmitz, C., & Lucas, C. (1990). Seeking the right stuff: Attitudinal traits, personal style, and other affective variables as predictors of exemplary student teaching. Education, 110(3), 270-282.
36.
Shultz, E., Neyhart, K., & Reck, U. M. (1996). Uphill all the way: An investigation of attitudinal predispositions of preservice teachers toward diversity in urban classrooms. Teacher Educator, 32(1), 22-36.
37.
Weiner, L. (1993). Preparing teachers for urban schools: Lessons from thirty years of school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
Young, B. A. (2002). Public school student, staff, and graduate counts by state: School year 2000-01 (NCES 2002-348). National Center for Education Statistics. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
39.
Zeichner, K. (1996). Educating teachers for cultural diversity. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Ed.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 133-175). New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
Zeichner, K., Grant, C., Gay, G., Gillette, M., Valli, L., & Villagas, A. M. (1998). A research informed vision of good practice in multicultural teacher education: Design principles. Theory Into Practice, 37(2), 163-171.
41.
Zimpher, N. L., & Ashburn, E. A. (1992). Countering parochialism in teacher candidates. In M. E. Dilworth (Ed.), Diversity in teacher education (pp. 40-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
