This 18-month ethnographic study provides a snapshot of teachers’ use of space and voice as they work in a newly formed Professional Development School (PDS) committed to shared responsibility for teacher education and developing a culture of simultaneous renewal through inquiry. The study identified the tensions produced when a PDS functions within a hierarchically organized district where teachers do not feel empowered to participate in decisions beyond their classroom and where mandates and standardization drive teachers’ work. This work informs those new to PDS work of ways teachers may first occupy the new spaces PDS work creates for teachers to be decision makers and teacher educators. Implications for the future of teachers’ work within partnerships focused on reform are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421-455.
2.
Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Toward a theory of school organization. London: Methuen.
3.
Blase, J. (1991). The micropolitical perspective. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 1-18). Newbury Park: Sage.
4.
Bullough, R. V., Kauchak, D., Crow, N. A., Hobbs, S., & Stokes, D. (1997). PDSs: Catalysts for teacher and school change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 153-169.
5.
Clandinin, D. J., Davies, A., Hogan, P., & Kennard, B. (1993). Learning to teach, teaching to learn: Stories of collaboration in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
Clift, R. T., Johnson, M., Holland, P., & Veal, M. L. (1992). Developing the potential for collaborative school leadership. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 877-908.
7.
Dana, N. F., Silva, D. Y., & Colangelo, L. (1998). The mentor teacher resource guide. Unpublished manuscript, State College Area School District, Pennsylvania State University College of Education Professional Development School.
8.
Dana, N. F., Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., Nolan, J., Zembal-Saul, C., Tzur, R., et al. (2001). Developing new understandings of PDS work: Better questions, better problems. Action in Teacher Education, 22(4), 15-27.
9.
Dana, N. F., Silva, D. Y., & Snow-Gerono, J. (2002, Winter). Building a culture of inquiry in professional development schools. Teacher Education and Practice, 15(4), 71-89.
10.
Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Silva, D. (2003). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Professional development schools: Schools for a developing profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1990). The principal’s role in shaping school culture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.
14.
Evans, K. S. (1999). Negotiating roles in collaborative literacy research: Re-examining issues of power and equity. Language Arts, 77(2), 128-136.
15.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109-135). New York: Pantheon.
16.
Frankes, L., Valli, L., & Cooper, D. H. (1998). Continuous learning for all adults in the professional development school: A review of the research. In D. J. McIntyre & D. M. Byrd (Eds.), Strategies for career-long teacher education: Teacher education yearbook VI (pp. 69-83). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.
18.
Greene, M. (1986). Reflection and passion in teaching. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 68-81.
19.
Henning, M. B. (2002). Social studies curriculum in a professional development school partnership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
20.
Hoyle, E. (1982). Micropolitics in educational organizations. Educational Management and Administration, 10, 87-98.
21.
Johnston, M., & Kerper, R. (1996). Positioning ourselves: Parity and power in collaborative work. Curriculum Inquiry, 26(1), 5-24.
22.
Levine, M. (1997). Educating teachers for restructured schools. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 620-647). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Malan, B. (1994). The micropolitics of education: Mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school polities. In J. D. Scribner & D. H. Layton, The study of educational politics (pp. 147-167). London: Taylor and Francis.
24.
Miller, J. L. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Powell, J. H., & McGowan, T. M. (1996). In search of autonomy: Teachers’ aspirations and expectations from a school-university collaborative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 249-260.
27.
Ross, E. W. (1993). Institutional constraints on curriculum deliberation. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(2), 95-111.
28.
Schneider, H., Seidman, I., & Cannone, P. (1996). Ten steps to collaboration: The story of a PDS. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 260-287.
29.
Silva, D. Y. (1999). Telling their stories: Mentor teachers’ ways of being and knowing in a professional development school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
30.
Silva, D. Y., & Dana, N. F. (2001). Collaborative supervision in the professional development school. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 16(4), 305-321.
31.
Sirotnik, K. A., & Goodlad, J. I. (1998). School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
32.
Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2003). Living an inquiry stance toward teaching: Teacher perceptions of inquiry in a professional development school context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
33.
Snow-Gerono, J., Silva, D. Y., & Nolan, J. (2002). Reconceptualizing curriculum for the PDS: University faculty negotiate tensions in collaborative design of methods courses. Action in Teacher Education, 24(3), 63-72.
34.
Stanulis, R. N. (1995). Classroom teachers as mentors: Possibilities for participation in a PDS. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(4), 331-344.
