Summative Evaluation of Student Teachers

Abstract

This article proposes that teacher education faculty are not taking sufficient care in preventing weak, incompetent student teachers from attaining state licenses. Several factors that contribute to this problem are cited and discussed. One explanation accounting for the difficulty in withholding licensure from weak students is that the concept of incompetence is not sufficiently clear. Responding to this explanation, the authors make the following two distinct contributions: (a) They place incompetence in a continuum of teaching behaviors from criminality and malpractice through best practice; and (b) teaching acts in specific settings are pronounced as indicators of teacher incompetence. The article concludes with significant caveats that need to be taken into account as the definitions of incompetence are shared or adopted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bridges, E. M. (1992). The incompetent teacher. London, UK: Falmer.

Essex, N. L. (1987). The teacher and malpractice. The Clearing House, 60(5), 212-215.

Farkas, S., & Johnson, J. (1997). Different drummers. Washington, DC: Public Agenda.

Gage, N. L. (1966). Desirable behaviors of teachers. In M. D. Usdan & F. Bertolaet (Eds.), Teachers for the disadvantaged (pp. 4-12). Chicago: Follett.

Gray, J. (1998, April). Paradox and pathos: Who fails the student teacher? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Lawrence, C. E., Vachon, M. K., Leake, D. O., & Leake, B. H. (1993). The marginal teacher. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.

Murray, F. B. (2001). From consensus standards to evidence of claims: Assessment and accreditation in the case of teacher education. In J. L. Ratcliff, E. S., Lubinescu, & M. A. Gaffney (Eds.), New directions for higher education: How accreditation influences assessment (No. 113, pp. 49-65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

National Commission on Teaching and the Nation's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: Author.

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2000) Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Washington, DC: Author.

10.

Raths, J. (1982). Evaluation of teachers. In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 611-618). New York: Free Press.

11.

Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching? Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 1-35.

12.

Ryans, D. G. (1960). Characteristics of teachers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

13.

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series in Curriculum Evaluation (No. 1). Chicago: Rand McNally.

14.

Scriven, M. (1988). Evaluating teachers as professionals: The duties-based approach. In J. J. Stanley & W. J. Popham (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success (pp. 110-142). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

15.

Sudzina, M., & Knowles, J. G. (1993). Personal, professional, and contextual circumstances of students who “fail”: Setting a course for understanding failure in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 254-262.

16.

Sudzina, M., Giebelhaus, C., & Coolican, M. (1997). Mentor or tormentor: The role of the cooperating teacher in student teacher success or failure. Action in Teacher Education, 18(4), 23-35.