The new teacher testing initiatives present a new opportunity and a new challenge to clarify thinking about the nature of the teaching profession and about the preparation of well-qualified individuals to meet the impending shortage of teachers for the nation’s schools. This article examines recent implementation of the controversial Massachusetts Educator Certification Tests and the educational, legal, and public policy issues in the implementation of a teacher testing program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Council on Education . (1999). To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught—an action agenda for college and university presidents. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association , & National Council for Measurement in Education (AERA/APA/NCME), Joint Committee on Educational and Psychological Testing. (1999). Standards on educational & psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3.
Archer, J. (1999, August 4). Alabama embattled over resuming teacher testing. Education Week, p. 3.
4.
Association of Mexican-American Educators v. California, 937 F. Supp. 1397 (N. C. Cal. 1996), aff’d, 183 F. 3d 1055 (9th Cir. 1999).
5.
Ballou, D. , & Podgursky, M. (1998). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence? Unpublished manuscript.
6.
Berry, B. , & Catoe, S. (1994). Creating PDS: Policy and practice in South Carolina’s PDS initiatives. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), PDS: Schools for developing a profession (pp. 176-202). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Bransford, J. , Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy.
8.
Cohen, D. K. , & Spillane, J. P. (1993). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 35-95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Council of Chief State School Officers . (1998). Key state education policies on K-12 education: Standards, graduation, assessment, teacher licensure, time, and attendance: A 50-state report. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Darling-Hammond, L. , & Barry, B. (1998, May 27). Investing in teaching: The dividend is student achievement. Education Week, pp. 48-49.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. , Wise, A. E., & Klein, S. P. (1999). A license to teach: Building a profession for 21st century schools. Boulder, CO: Westview.
12.
Dewey, J. (1956). The child and the curriculum and The school and society (reprinted in one Vol.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1900)
13.
Dill, W. (1998, November/December). Guard dogs or guide dogs? Adequacy vs. quality in the accreditation of teacher education. Change, pp. 13-17.
14.
Ebbert, S. (1998, July 3). Carlin demands teacher strategy from colleges. The Boston Globe, pp. B1, B4.
15.
Frazier, C. (1998). University responsibility for a public purpose: Institutional accountability and teacher education. In R. A. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 137-150). London: Falmer.
16.
Fuhrman, S. H. (Ed.). (1993). Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Fullan, M. , Galluzo, G., Morris, P., & Watson, N. (1998). The rise and stall of teacher education reform. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
18.
Georgia Association of Educators v. Georgia, Civil Action No. C86-2234A (1988, March 2). Settlement agreement and dismissal with prejudice.
19.
Georgia Association of Educators v. Nix, 407 F. Supp. 1102 (N. D. Ga. 1976).
20.
Groves v. Alabama State Board of Education, 776 Supp. 1518, 1525 (M. D. Ala. 1991).
21.
Haney, W. , Fowler, C., Wheelock, A., Bebell, D., & Malec, N. (1999, February). Less truth than error? An independent study of the Massachusetts teacher tests. Educational policy analysis archives [Online]. Available: www. http//epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v. 7n. 4
22.
Harrah Independent School District v. Martin, 440 U. S. 194 (1979).
23.
Hart, J. (1998, August 5). The teacher test: Madison, via Silber. The Boston Globe, pp. A1, A20.
24.
Hauptmann, A. (2000). Key public issues in the United States. In P. Altbach (Ed.), International higher education (p. 21). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.
25.
Haycock, K. (1998, Spring). Not good enough: A content analysis of teacher licensing examinations. Thinking K-16, 3, 1. Washington, DC: The Education Trust, 1-2.
26.
Haydu, F. (1998, October 23). Celluci misstates my views on education, testing. The Boston Globe, p. A26.
27.
Herbst, J. (1989). And sadly teach: Teacher education and professionalization in American culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
28.
Higher Education Reauthorization Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-244, 20 U. S. C. § 1021-1030.
29.
Holmes Group . (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. East Lansing, MI: Author.
30.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation . (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Kaplin, W. , & Lee, B. (1994). The law of higher education (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Keough, R. (1998, August 8). The wrong kind of dictation on MCAS test. The Boston Globe, p. A14.
33.
Klein, S. (1998, June). Standards for teacher tests. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 122, 124.
34.
Kornblut, A. E. (1998, July 2). Poor test scores force colleges to reassess. The Boston Globe, pp. A1, A16.
35.
Madaus, G. (1990). Legal and professional issues in teacher-certification testing: A psychometric snark hunt. In J. Mitchell, S. Wise, & B. Plake (Eds.), Assessment of teaching: Purposes, practices, and implications for the profession. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
Madaus, G. , & Pullin, D. (1987, September). Teacher certification tests: Do they really measure what we need to know?Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 31-38.
37.
Massachusetts Department of Education . (1998a). General information about the Massachusetts teacher tests [Online]. Available: http://www.doe.mass.edu/teachertest/info_booklet/TSTINFO
38.
Massachusetts Department of Education . (1998b). Massachusetts teacher tests: 1998-1999 registration bulletin.
39.
Massachusetts Department of Education . (1998c). Massachusetts teacher tests: Test information booklet [Online]. Available: http://www.doe.mass.edu/teachertest/infobooklet
40.
Massachusetts Department of Education . (1998d). Qualifying Score Alternatives and Examinee Passing Rates for All Examinees and by Gender and Ethnicity. Massachusetts educator certification tests: Technical report summary [Online]. Available: http://www.doe.mass.edu/teachertest/0727/99c/techsumm.html
41.
Massachusetts Department of Education (1999a, August 13). Massachusetts educator certification tests: Technical report summary [Online]. Available: http://www.doe.mass.edu/teachertest/0727/99c/techsumm.html
42.
Massachusetts Department of Education (1999b). Massachusetts education certification tests: Annual summary of institutional results (Cumulative) [Retrieved online March 3, 2000]. Available: http://www.doe.mass.edu/teachertest/ry9899/summary
43.
Massachusetts Department of Education (1999c). Proposed routes to licensure, licenses, and standards for Massachusetts educators [Retrieved online February 24, 2000]. Available: http://www.doe.mass.edu
44.
Melnick, S. L. (1996). Reforming teacher education through legislation: A case study from Florida. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 30-61). New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
Melnick, S. , & Pullin, D. (1987). Testing teachers’ professional knowledge: Legal and educational policy implications. Educational Policy, 1(2), 215-229.
46.
Messick, S. (1993). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement: Issues and practice (3rd ed., pp. 13-104). Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx.
47.
Mitchell, R. , & Barth, P. (1999, Spring). How teacher licensing tests fall short. Thinking K-16, 3, 1. Washington, DC: The Education Trust, 3-23.
48.
Murnane, R. (1992). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Murnane, R. (1999, January 28). How to judge teachers. The Boston Globe, p. A19.
50.
Murray, F. B. (1999). The challenges teacher education presents for higher education. In R. A. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 59-86). London: Falmer.
51.
National Center for Education Statistics . (1996, August). Out of the lecture hall and into the classroom: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
52.
National Center for Education Statistics . (1997a, July). America’s teachers: Profile of a profession, 1993-94. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
53.
National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. National Center for Education Statistics . (1997b, May). Schools and staffing survey: Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the teacher follow-up survey, 1994-95. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
54.
(1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s future. Washington, DC: Author.
55.
Osborne, D. (1992, Fall). Turning around Arkansas’ schools: Bill Clinton and education reform. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 16(3), 6-17.
56.
Progress on Teachers . (1998, July 28). Editorial. The Boston Globe, p. A14.
57.
Raths, J. (1999). A Grimm tale. In R. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 129-136). London: Falmer.
58.
Richardson v. Lamar County Board of Education et al., 729 F. Supp. 806, 820-821 (M. D. Ala. 1989), aff’d, 935 F. 2d 1240 (5th Cir. 1984).
59.
Rodriguez, E. M. (1998, July). Preparing quality teachers: Issues and trends in the states. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
60.
Sedlak, M. W. (1989). “Let us go and buy a schoolmaster”: Historical perspectives on the hiring of teachers in the United States, 1750-1980. In D. Warren (Ed.), American teachers: Histories of a profession at work (pp. 257-292). New York: Macmillan.
61.
Smith, M. , & O’Day, J. (1997). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing. London: Falmer.
62.
Stoddart, T. , & Floden, R. (1996). Traditional and alternate routes to teacher certification: Issues, assumptions, and misconceptions. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 80-108). New York: Teachers College Press.
63.
Trudeau, N. (1999, May 6). Former state ed board chairman airs his controversial views at PTO forum. Tab, Newton, MA.
64.
U. S. v. LULAC, 793 F. 2d 772 (5th Cir. 1986).
65.
U. S. v. North Carolina, 400 F. Supp. 343 (E. D. N. C., 1975), vacated on other grounds, 425 F. Supp. 789 (E. D. N. C., 1977).
66.
U. S. v. South Carolina, 445 F. Supp. 1094 (D. S. C. 1977), aff’d, 434 U. S. 1026 (1978).
67.
Walden, J. , & Deaton, W. (1988). Alabama’s teacher certification test fails. West’s Education Law Reporter, 421.
68.
Webster’s new collegiate dictionary. (1979). Springfield, MA: G. and C. Merriam.
69.
Zernike, K. (1998, August 25). Educators, state clash on training, officials push stricter standards. The Boston Globe, p. A1.
