Respondents from 49 state education agencies completed a survey describing state-level implementation of transition services for youth with disabilities. All states used technical assistance and cross-disciplinary training as their primary systems change strategies, and the majority of these states viewed these strategies as effective. Relatively few states used additional state legislative mandates to promote transition services. This article discusses the role of the state education agency in implementing systems change in special education transition services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asselin, S. B. (1995, October 19). Transition revisited: Are we moving forward? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Division on Career Development and Transition, Council for Exceptional Children, Raleigh, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392 190)
2.
Benz, M. R., Yovanoff, P., & Doren, B. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151–166.
3.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–414.
4.
deFur, S. (in press). Transition summary: Collaborative transition planning. Washington, DC: National Institute for Children and Youth with Disabilities.
5.
deFur, S., & Taymans, J. (1995). Competencies needed for transition specialists in vocational rehabilitation, vocational education, and special education. Exceptional Children, 62, 38–51.
6.
DeStefano, L., Hasazi, S., Cobb, B., Johnson, D., Guy, B., & Shriner, K. (1995). Issues in the evaluation of a multi-site federal system change initiative. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 790)
7.
Edgar, E. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?Exceptional Children, 53, 555–561.
8.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400--1485.
9.
Espinola, D. L. (1994, April). Using a transition needs assessment as an evaluation tool for a statewide effort to increase transition opportunities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 012)
10.
Fink, A., & Kosecoff, J. (1985). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Furney, K. S., Hasazi, S. B., & DeStefano, L. (1997). Transition policies, practices, and promises: Lessons from three states. Exceptional Children, 63, 343–356.
13.
Grigal, M., Test, D. W., Beattie, J., & Wood, W. M. (1997). An evaluation of transition components of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 63, 357–372.
14.
Hakola, S. R. (1996). Transitioning students: Your guide to successful strategies. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
15.
Halloran, W. D., & Simon, M. Y. (1995). The transition services requirement: A federal perspective on issues, implications, and challenges. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 17, 94–97.
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1414 et seq.
17.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(vii)(I).
18.
Johnson, J., & Rusch, F. (1993). Secondary special education and transition services: Identification and recommendations for future research and demonstration. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16(1), 1–18.
19.
Kohler, P. D. (1992). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied?Working paper of the Transition Research Institute at Illinois. Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
20.
Kohler, P. D., & Rusch, F. R. (1994). Employment of youths with disabilities: Outcomes, activities, and indicators. Champaign, IL: Transition Research Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371--521)
21.
Lewis, P., & Kleinert, H. L. (1992). Kentucky's systems change for students with severe disabilities. Final report. Lexington: University of Kentucky. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 740)
22.
Mallory, B. L. (1996). The role of social policy in life-cycle transitions. Exceptional Children, 62, 213–223.
23.
McAfee, J. (1988). Adult adjustment of individuals with mental retardation. In P. J. Schloss, C. A. Hughes, & M. A. Smith (Eds.), Mental retardation: Community transition (pp. 115–162). Boston: Little, Brown.
24.
Morningstar, M. E., Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1996). What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family involvement in the transition from school to adult life?Exceptional Children, 62, 249–260.
25.
Morrissey, P., & Hicks, J. (1995). The School to Work Opportunities Act: An analysis of selected states' initial efforts. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
26.
Phelps, L. A., & Wermuth, T. R. (1992). Effective vocational education for students with special needs: A framework. Berkeley: National Center for Research in Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 352 466)
27.
Repetto, J. B. (1995). Curriculum beyond school walls: Implications of transition education. Peabody Journal of Education, 70, 125–140.
28.
Repetto, J. B., & Correa, V. I. (1996). Expanding views on transition. Exceptional Children, 62, 551–513.
29.
Roessler, R., Brolin, D., & Johnson, J. (1990). Factors affecting employment success and quality of life: A 1--year follow-up of students in special education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 13(2), 95–107.
30.
School to Work Opportunities Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. § 6101--6251 (Supp. 1995).
31.
Snauwaert, D. T., & DeStefano, L. (1990). A comparative analysis of state transition planning. In F. R. Rusch (Ed.). Supported employment: Models, methods, and issues (pp. 409–425). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
32.
Storms, J., Bayliss, C., Kincaid, J., & Carter, S. (1993). Transition services beyond graduation: State policies and perspectives. Eugene: University of Oregon, Western Regional Resource Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 379 884)
33.
Thompson, J. R., Hung-Chin, L., Halpern, S., & Johnson, D. R. (1994). Minnesota post-school follow-up study, 1994. St. Paul: Minnesota State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 703)
34.
U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
35.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., D'Amico, R., Jay, E., Butler-Nalin, P., Marder, C., & Cox, R. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
36.
Wermuth, T. P., & Grayson T. E. (1995). Case studies of state-level cross-disciplinary transition policy implementation. Champaign, IL: Transition Research Institute.
37.
Whitney-Thomas, J., & Hanley-Maxwell, C. (1996). Packing the parachute: Parents' experiences as their children prepare to leave high school. Exceptional Children, 63, 75–88.
