Special Education Administrators in the United States

Abstract

This study presents a description and analysis of special education administrators' perceptions regarding (a) personnel needs, (b) quality of preparation, (c) training needs, and (d) administrative policies/practices for mainstreaming students with disabilities. A randomly selected national sample of 2,900 special education directors were mailed a questionnaire focusing on these policy and personnel issues. A total of 1,468 special education directors responded to this survey. A current shortage of special education administrative personnel was found in 10% of the responding school districts. A projected shortage of special education administrative personnel in the next 4 years was found to affect 789 of the 1,468 school districts represented. The education and experience of many special education directors appears adequate; however, over one third of the respondents had neither certification in teaching special education nor appreciable experience teaching in special education. The policy/practice with the highest training need was “to increase collaboration between regular and special education.” Special education directors having backgrounds including both special education teaching and special education course work had significantly higher levels of mainstreamed students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arick, J. , & Krug, D. (1989). Local education agency special education administrator survey. Unpublished manuscript, Portland State University, School of Education, Department of Special Education and Counselor Education, Portland, OR.

Berres, M. , & Knoblock, P. (1987). Lessons from integrated education. In M. S. Berres & P. Knoblock (Eds.), Program models for mainstreaming: Integrating students with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 287–302). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Finkenbinder, R. L. (1981). Special education administration and supervision: The state of the art. The Journal of Special Education, 15, 485–495.

Hirth, M. , & Valesky, T. (1989). Principals' knowledge of special education law. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 6(3), 130–141.

Lindsey, B. (1986, November). PRIDE: Principals, resources, information and direction for excellence in special education. Paper presented at the 11th annual meeting of the National Council of States on Inservice Education, Nashville, TN.

Maheady, L. , & Algozzine, B. (1991). The regular education initiative---Can we proceed in an orderly and scientific manner? Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 66–73.

O' Reilly, C. , & Squires, S. (1985). Special education in-service for metro area school administrators. Omaha: Nebraska University at Omaha Press.

Slavin, R. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary school: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293–336.

Stainback, S. , & Stainback, W. (1989). Practical organizational strategies. In S. Stainback , W. Stainback , & M. Forest (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 15–28). Baltimore: Brookes.

10.

Valesky, T. , & Hirth, M. (1992). Survey of the states: Special education knowledge requirements for school administrators. Exceptional Children, 58, 399–405.

11.

Vargas, J. (1984). What are your exercises teaching? An analysis of stimulus control in instructional materials. In W. L. Heward , T. E. Heron , D. S. Hill , & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 126–141). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

12.

Weinstein, D. F. (1989). The school administrator and special education programs: Quality control of placement and instruction. ERS Spectrum, 1(3), 35–40.

13.

Wilkinson, L. (1988). SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT Inc.

14.

Will, M. (1987). Educating students with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.