We investigated the influence of teacher efficacy and student problem type on teachers' placement and referral decisions. Regular and special educators (N= 192) were randomly assigned a case study describing a student having a learning and/or behavior problem and asked to judge (a) whether the student was appropriately placed in regular education and (b) whether they would refer this student to special education. Analysis of an efficacy scale yielded two factors: personal efficacy and teaching efficacy. Results indicated that regular and special educators were most likely to agree with regular class placement when they were high in both dimensions of efficacy. Regular educators higher in personal efficacy were more likely to agree with regular education placement than those with lower personal efficacy. In addition, students with combined learning and behavior problems were found to be the most susceptible to referral. This study suggests that teachers' sense of efficacy underlies their placement decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Algozzine, B., Christenson, S., & Yesseldyke, J.E. (1982). Probabilities associated with the referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5, 19–23.
2.
Anderson, P.L., Cronin, M.E., & Miller, J.H. (1986). Referral reasons for learning disabled students. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 388–395.
3.
Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R.B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
4.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
5.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
6.
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special class versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
7.
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
8.
Christenson, S., Ysseldyke, J.E., & Algozzine, B. (1982). Institutional and external pressures influencing referral decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 341–345.
9.
Clark, C.M., & Peterson, P.L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
10.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Dembo, M.H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers' sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. Elementary School Journal, 86, 173–184.
13.
Gartner, A. (1986). Disabling help: Special education at the crossroads. Exceptional Children, 53, 72–76.
14.
Gelzheiser, L.M. (1990). Reducing the number of students identified as learning disabled: A question of practice, philosophy, or policy? In S.B. Sigmon (Ed.), Critical voices in special education: Problems and progress concerning the mildly handicapped (pp. 43–50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M.H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.
16.
Gottlieb, J. (1985). Report to the Mayor's Commission on Special Education on COH practices in New York City. In New York City Commission on Special Education, Special Education: A Call for Quality. New York: Mayor's Commission on Special Education.
17.
Gottlieb, J., Gottlieb, B.W., & Trongone, S. (1991). Parent and teacher referrals for a psychoeducational evaluation. Journal of Special Education, 25, 155–167.
18.
Guskin, S.L. (1978). Theoretical and empirical strategies for the study of the labeling of mentally retarded persons. In N.R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 9, pp. 127–157). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Huitema, B.E. (1980). The analysis of covariance and alternatives. New York: Wiley.
20.
McIntyre, L.L. (1990). Teacher standards and gender: Factors in special education referral?Journal of Educational Research, 83, 166–172.
21.
Meijer, C.J.W., & Foster, S.F. (1988). The effect of teacher self-efficacy on referral chance. Journal of Special Education, 22, 378–385.
22.
Nisbett, R.E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1982). Multiple regression analysis in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24.
Rohrkemper, M.M., & Brophy, J.E. (1983). Teachers' thinking about problem students. In J.M. Levine & M.C. Wang (Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
U.S. Department of Education. (1988). To assure the free and appropriate public education of all handicapped children: Tenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
Woolfolk, A.E., & Hoy, W.K. (1990). Prospective teachers' sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81–91.
28.
Woolfolk, A.E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W.K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 137–148.
29.
Ysseldyke, J.E., & Algozzine, B. (1982). Critical issues in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
Ysseldyke, J., Christenson, S., Pianta, B., & Algozzine, B. (1983). An analysis of teachers' reasons and desired outcomes for students referred for psychoeducational assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 73–83.
