The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of existing state school attendance policies for children with acquired immune-deficiency syndrome (AIDS). In addition, responses from a brief survey instrument were used to secure information regarding the development and use of these policies. Results indicated that the majority of states had developed policies emphasizing the education of children with AIDS within the regular classroom setting, the use of preventive measures enhancing hygiene and sanitary practices, and the involvement of health officials as appropriate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Black, J.L., & Jones, L.H. (1988). HIV infection: Educational programs and policies for school personnel. Journal of School Health, 58, 317‐321.
2.
Board of Education v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273, 1S.Ct. 112. (1987).
3.
Board of Education of City of Plainfield v. Cooperman, 1NJ. 587 (Sup. Ct. N.J. 1987).
4.
Broadwell, C.A., & Strope, J.L. (1989). Students with AIDS. Ed. Law Rep, 49, p. 1105.
5.
Centers for Disease Control. (1988). Guidelines for effective school health education to prevent the spread of AIDS. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
6.
Coose, L.HIV/AIDS students in the public schools: Policy development and program implementation. In Proceedings of the 1989 ACRES/NRSSC Symposium. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 227)
7.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L. 94--142), 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1401.
8.
Garms, W.I., Guthrie, J.W., & Pierce, L.C. (1988). School finance and education policy: Enhancing educational efficiency, equality, and choice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
Helm, V.M. (1989). Keep these guidelines in mind when you develop AIDS policies. The American School Board Journal, 176, 25‐26.
10.
Illinois State Board of Education. (1989). Management of chronic infectious diseases in school childre. (rev. ed.). Springfield: Illinois State Board of Education; Illinois State Department of Public Health. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 855.
11.
Johnston, A.P., & Moore, J.M. (1986). Policy planning and state reforms of the 1980's. Educational Planning, 5(2), 4–12.
12.
Kearney, C.P.Value polarities and complementarities in American education policy making: Efficiency and choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 3860)
13.
Keogh, B.K. (1990). Narrowing the gap between policy and practice. Exceptional Children, 57, 186‐190.
14.
Lohrmann, D.K. (1988). AIDS education at the local level: The pragmatic issues. Journal of School Health, 58, 330‐334.
15.
Lutz, F. (1988). Policy oriented research: What constitutes good proof. Theory Into Practice, 27, 126‐132.
16.
Martinez v. School Board of Hillsborough County, Florida, 675 F. Supp. 1574 (M.D. Fla. 1987).
17.
Miller, S. (1981). Defining educational policy studies as a field. Educational Studies, 12, 119‐125.
18.
National Association of State Boards in Education. (1989). HIV/AIDS education survey: Profiles of state policy actions. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Pugh, W.C.An evaluator ponders: What motivates policymakers? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 422)
22.
Radal, R. (1988). A public choice theory of school board members behavior. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 225‐236.
23.
Rogers, J.J. (1989). Regular review will help keep your AIDS policies sound and up to date. American School Board Journal, 176, 26‐27.
