Classroom Teachers' Views Of Intervention Strategies For Learning And Behavior Problems: Which Are Reasonable And How Frequently Are They Used?

Abstract

This study investigated intervention strategies that general educators use and believe are reasonable for implementation when dealing with children with mild learning and behavior problems. Two sources of data were used. Teachers from Wisconsin and Illinois (n = 232) rated how often they used 57 intervention strategies and how reasonable these strategies were for implementation in the classroom as a means of accommodating the needs of students with mild learning and behavior problems. Teacher ratings of use and reasonability were factor-analyzed, and five factors were generated for each. The two factor structures were interrelated and had similar factors. Factors generated for use were principal involvement, teacher intervention, special education, teacher consultation, and parent involvement. Factors generated for reasonability were teacher intervention, principal/teacher consultation, student alternatives, special education, and data collection. Eighty-seven of these teachers then were interviewed to determine specific issues they consider when determining whether an intervention strategy can be implemented reasonably in their classrooms. These data provide a clear profile of interventions teachers use and find reasonable, as well as an indication of factors that inhibit teachers from selecting intervention strategies to address the mild learning and behavior problems of their students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine, B. , Ysseldyke, J.E. , Christenson, S. , & Thurlow, M. (1983). A factor analysis of teachers' intervention choices for dealing with students' behavior and learning problems. Elementary School Journal, 84, 189–197.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

Blankenship, C.S. , & Johnson, L.J. (1983). Specialized instruction: Report of a three-year follow-up study of program graduates. Teacher Education and Special Education, 6, 112–120.

Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.

Chalfant, J.C. , Pysh, M.V.D. , & Moultrie, R. (1979). Teacher assistance teams: A model for within-building problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 85–96.

Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurements: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.

Elliott, S.N. (1938). Acceptability for behavioral treatments: Review of variables that influence treatment selection. Professional Psychology, 19(1), 68–80.

Elliott, S.N. , Witt, J.C. , Galvin, G.A. , & Peterson, R. (1984). Acceptability of positive and reductive behavioral interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 353–360.

Fuchs, L.S. , Deno, S.L. , Mirkin, P.K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460.

10.

Fuchs, D. , & Fuchs, L. (1988). Mainstream assistance teams to accommodate difficult to teach students in general education. In J.L. Graden , J.E. Zins , & M.J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 49–70). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

11.

Graden, J.L. , Casey, A. , & Christenson, S.L. (1985). Implementing a prereferral intervention system. Part I: The model. Exceptional Children, 51, 377–384.

12.

Harman, H.H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: TheUniversity of Chicago Press.

13.

Hebbler, S.W. (in press). A basic program for computing the coefficient of concordance. Education and Psychological Measurement.

14.

Hull, C.N. , & Nie, N.H. (1981). SPSS update: New procedures and facilities for releases 7–9. New York: McGraw-Hill.

15.

Idol, L. , Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. , & Nevin, A. (1986). Collaborative consultation. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

16.

Johnson, L.J. (1986). Factors that influence skill acquisition of practicum students during field-based experience. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9(3), 89–103.

17.

Johnson, L.J. (1989). Procedures for conducting a content analysis. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

18.

Johnson, L.J. , & Heal, L. (1987). Developing a minimum level of interrater agreement. Capstone Journal of Education, 7, 51–64.

19.

Kazdin, A.E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273.

20.

Lambert, N.M. (1976). Children's problems and classroom intervention from the perspective of classroom teachers. Professional Psychology, 7, 507–517.

21.

Martens, B.K. , Peterson, R.L. , Witt, J.C. , & Cirone, S. (1986). Teacher perceptions of school-based interventions. Exceptional Children, 53, 213–223.

22.

Norusis, M.J. (1985). SPSS-X: Advanced statistics guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.

23.

Pugach, M.C. , & Johnson, L.J. (1988). Rethinking the relationship between consultation and collaborative problemsolving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21(4), 1–8.

24.

Tymitz, B.L. (1984). The case for reasonable intervention: Training implications for judicious referral and placement decisions. Teacher Education and Special Education, 7, 12–19.

25.

Witt, J.C. , & Elliott, S.N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

26.

Witt, J.C. , Elliott, S.N. , & Martens, B.K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral intervention used in classrooms: The influence of amount, of teacher time, severity of behavioral problem, and type of intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 95–104.