Statewide Intervention Systems: An Overview of the New Federal Program for Infants and Toddlers with Handicaps

Abstract

Public Law 99–457 amended Public Law 94–142 to add Part H, a discretionary formula grant program for infants and toddlers with handicaps. The legislation allows implementation of statewide systems of early intervention services, characterized by 14 required components. This paper presents the results of analyses obtained through review of applications for the Part H program submitted by 50 states and the District of Columbia. Two primary measures were investigated to determine potential differences among states on the basis of type of lead agency and previous activities related to early intervention for infants and toddlers. The first was the number and type of required components selected for emphasis during initial year activities. The second was the allocation of funds for administration, interagency coordinating council, planning, and services. In general, states demonstrated relative consistency across a number of factors while significant differences and variability were noted on others. These results are discussed in terms of implications for the development of quality services for infants and toddlers and their families and of priority needs to ensure successful implementation of this program.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bickman, L. , & Weatherford, D.L. (Eds.) (1986). Evaluating early intervention programs for severely handicapped children and their families. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Campbell, P.H. (in press). Meeting the needs of infants and toddlers and their families. In A. Kaiser & C. McWhorter (Eds.), Preparing personnel to work with persons who are severely handicapped. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Carran, N.B. (1986). National directory of early childhood/special education matrix. In There ought to be a law? (pp. 16–17). Washington, DC: National Center for Clinical Infant Programs.

Dunst, C.J. (1985). Rethinking early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 165–201.

Dunst, C.J. , Trivette, C. , & Cross, A. (1986). Roles and support networks of mothers of handicapped children. In R. Fewell & P. Vadasy (Eds.), Families of handicapped children: Needs and supports across the life span (pp. 167–192). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Ensher, G.L. , & Clark, D.A. (Eds.). (1986). Newborns at risk: Medical care and psychoeducational intervention. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.

Fewell, R.R. (1986). The measurement for family functioning. In L. Bickman & D. Weatherford (Eds.), Evaluating early intervention in programs for severely handicapped children and their families (pp. 263–307). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

Fraas, C.J. (1986). Preschool programs for the education of handicapped children: Background, issues, and federal policy options. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Meisels, S.J. , Harbin, G. , Modigliani, K. , & Olson, K. (in press). Formulating optimal state early childhood intervention policies. Exceptional Children.

10.

Ramey, C.T. , & Trohanis, P.L. (1982). Finding and educating high-risk and handicapped infants. Baltimore: University Park Press.

11.

Rossetti, L. (1986). High-risk infants: Identification, assessment, and intervention. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.

12.

Spence, K. & Trohanis, P. (1985). Status in states of early childhood special education across twelve dimensions and state participation in five federal program networks. Chapel Hill, NC: START/TADS.

13.

Turnbull, A.P. , Summers, J.A. , & Brotherson, M.J. (1983). Working with families with disabled members: A family systems approach (Monograph). Lawrence: University of Kansas, The Research and Training Center on Independent Living.

14.

Vohs, J. (1987). A parent perspective on case management services. Paper presented at the Surgeon General's Conference on Family-Centered, Comprehensive, Coordinated, Community-based Care for Children with Special Health Care Needs, Houston, TX.