An Updated Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Peer Support Arrangements

Abstract

Peer support arrangements are designed to promote meaningful inclusion for students with extensive support needs. In this systematic review, we identified 13 single-case design studies and two randomized controlled trials that confirm the previous conclusion that peer support arrangements are an evidence-based practice for increasing peer interactions, and support a new conclusion that they are an evidence-based practice for increasing academic engagement when baseline-level engagement is relatively low (i.e., <50%). Recent studies demonstrate that peer support arrangements are effective not only for secondary students, but also for elementary and transition-aged students. Some studies also provide insight into adaptations to optimize effectiveness and generalization. Descriptive findings suggest that peers who provide support may also benefit, although further research is needed.

Keywords

inclusion general education extensive support needs peers peer support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Asmus

J. M.

Carter

E. W.

Moss

C. K.

Born

T. L.

Vincent

L. B.

Lloyd

B. P.

Chung

Y.-C.

(2016). Social outcomes and acceptability of two peer-mediated interventions for high school students with severe disabilities: A pilot study. Inclusion, 4(4), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.4.195

*Athamanah

L. S.

Cushing

L. S.

(2019). Implementing a peer-mediated intervention in a work-based learning setting for students with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471905400209

*Biggs

E. E.

Carter

E. W.

Gustafson

(2017). Efficacy of peer support arrangements to increase peer interaction and AAC use. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.25

Brock

M. E.

(2018). Trends in the educational placement of students with intellectual disability in the United States over the past 40 Years. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.4.305

*Brock

M. E.

Biggs

E. E.

Carter

E. W.

Cattey

G. N.

Raley

K. S.

(2016). Implementation and generalization of peer support arrangements for students with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 49(4), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466915594368

*Brock

M. E.

Carter

E. W.

(2016). Efficacy of teachers training paraprofessionals to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585564

Brock

M. E.

Huber

H. B.

(2017). Are peer support arrangements an evidence-based practice? A systematic review. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917708184

*Carter

E. W.

Asmus

Moss

C. K.

Biggs

E. E.

Bolt

D. M.

Born

T. L.

Brock

M. E.

Cattey

G. N.

Chen

Cooney

Fesperman

Hochman

J. M.

Huber

H. B.

Lequia

J. L.

Lyons

Moyseenko

K. A.

Riesch

L. M.

Shalev

R. A.

Vincent

L. B.

Weir

(2016). Randomized evaluation of peer support arrangements to support the inclusion of high school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598780

*Carter

E. W.

Moss

C. K.

Hoffman

Chung

Y.-C.

Sisco

(2011). Efficacy and social validity of Peer Support Arrangements for adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800107

10.

*Carter

E. W.

Sisco

L. G.

Melekoglu

M. A.

Kurkowski

(2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(4), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.32.4.213

11.

Cook

B. G.

Buysse

Klingner

Landrum

T. J.

McWilliam

R. A.

Tankersley

Test

D. W.

(2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271

12.

*Cushing

L. S.

Kennedy

C. H.

(1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-139

13.

Feldman

Carter

E. W.

Asmus

Brock

M. E.

(2016). Presence, proximity, and peer interactions of adolescents with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585481

14.

Gee

Gonzalez

Cooper

(2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469

15.

*Huber

H. B.

Carter

E. W.

(2023). Impact and individualization of peer support arrangements for high school students with autism using structural analysis. Inclusion, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-11.1.1

16.

*Huber

H. B.

Carter

E. W.

Lopano

S. E.

Stankiewicz

K. C.

(2018). Using structural analysis to inform peer support arrangements for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 123(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-123.2.119

17.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

18.

Porbital. (2025). PlotDigitizer Online App. PlotDigitizer. https://plotdigitizer.com/app

19.

Pustejovsky

J. E.

Chen

Klingbeil

D. A.

Van Norman

E. R.

(2023). Between-case standardized mean differences: Flexible methods for single-case designs. Journal of School Psychology, 98, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2023.02.002

20.

Reichow

Volkmar

F. R.

(2010). Social skills interventions for individuals with autism: Evaluation for evidence-based practices within a best evidence synthesis framework. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009

21.

*Schaefer

J. M.

Cannella-Malone

Brock

M. E.

(2018). Effects of peer support arrangements across instructional formats and environments for students with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517727865

22.

*Shukla

Kennedy

C. H.

Cushing

L. S.

(1998). Adult influence on the participation of peers without disabilities in peer support programs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022801215119

23.

*Shukla

Kennedy

C. H.

Cushing

L. S.

(1999). Intermediate school students with severe disabilities: Supporting their social participation in general education classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830079900100301

24.

*Trausch

K. J.

Brock

M. E.

Anderson

E. J.

(2022). Efficacy of paraeducators facilitating peer support arrangements for elementary students with multiple disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 43(6), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063607

25.

Travers

H. E.

Carter

E. W.

(2022). A systematic review of how peer-mediated interventions impact students without disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 43(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521989414

26.

U.S. Department of Education. (2024). Forty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2023.

27.

Valentine

J. C.

Tanner-Smith

E. E.

Pustejovsky

J. E.

Lau

T. S.

(2016). Between-case standardized mean difference effect sizes for single-case designs: A primer and tutorial using the scdhlm web application. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2016.1

28.

Walker

V. L.

Coogle

Mickelson

Masud

A. B.

(2024). Paraeducator perspectives on supporting students with autism spectrum disorder: Implications for improving paraeducator training and supervision. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 39, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576241232887

29.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Kurth

(2021). The state of inclusion with students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.1233