Professionals’ Perceived Influence on Outcomes of Multisystem-Involved Youth

Abstract

Youth involved in multiple systems, such as special education, juvenile justice, and foster care, often face complex challenges. Professionals inherently contribute to youth outcomes by supporting multisystem-involved youth. Through interviews, we explored the perspectives of a special education teacher, a school resource officer, a school administrator, and a youth parole supervisor to understand their perceived influence on youth. We synthesized these perspectives to identify the patterns of connection between the overlapping works of these professionals. A grounded theory model is provided as a result of data analysis to efficiently illustrate the connection of conceptual insights shared. These include expected outcomes, professional successes, youth agency, and contextual factors. These elements converge to demonstrate how professionals’ influence on youth outcomes develops.

Keywords

special education professionals juvenile justice youth outcomes job satisfaction professional’s perceptions expectancy theory grounded theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Spanier

G. B.

(1980). Treatment of delinquent youth: The influence of the juvenile probation officer’s perceptions of self and work. Criminology, 17(4), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1980.tb01314

Boveda

Annamma

S. A.

(2023). Beyond making a statement: An intersectional framing of the power and possibilities of positioning. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231167149

Braun

Clarke

(2013). Successful qualitative research. Sage.

Brunsting

N. C.

Sreckovic

M. A.

Lane

K. L.

(2014). Special education teacher burnout: A synthesis of research from 1979 to 2013. Education and Treatment of Children, 37(4), 681–711. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2014.0032

Butts

J. A.

Bazemore

Meroe

A. S.

(2010). Positive youth justice: Framing justice interventions using the concepts of positive youth development. Coalition for Juvenile Justice.

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.

Charmaz

Thornberg

(2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357

Corona

L. L.

Christodulu

K. V.

Rinaldi

M. L.

(2017). Investigation of school professionals’self-efficacy for working with students with ASD: Impact of prior experience, knowledge, and training. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300716667604

Dempsey

M. P.

Davis

W. M.

Forbes

Penkoff

C. B.

Gonsoulin

Harris

P. W.

(2021). Juvenile justice administrator perspectives: Reframing reentry around positive youth outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 46(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742920965134

10.

Duffy

R. D.

Raque-Bogdan

T. L.

(2010). The motivation to serve others: Exploring relations to career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710364791

11.

Gentrup

Lorenz

Kristen

Kogan

(2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101296

12.

Greenberger

Chen

Beam

M. R.

(1998). The role of “very important” nonparental adults in adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022803120166

13.

Hancock

D. R.

(1995). What teachers may do to influence student motivation: An application of expectancy theory. The Journal of General Education, 44(3), 171–179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27797259

14.

Herz

Lee

Lutz

Stewart

Tuell

Wiig

(2012). Addressing the needs of multi-system youth: Strengthening the connection between child welfare and juvenile justice. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

15.

Krezmien

M. P.

Leone

P. E.

Zablocki

M. S.

Wells

C. S.

(2010). Juvenile court referrals and the public schools: Nature and extent of the practice in five states. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986210368642

16.

Leone

Weinberg

(2010). Addressing the unmet educational needs of children and youth in the juvenile justice and child welfare systems. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

17.

Mathur

S. R.

Griller Clark

Hartzell

R. I.

LaCroix

McTier

T. S.

(2020). What youth with special needs in juvenile justice say about reentry: Listening to their voice. Youth & Society, 52(8), 1501–1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19826423

18.

Miner

J. B.

(2005). Organizational behavior: Essential theories of motivation and leadership (Vol. 1). M.E. Sharpe.

19.

Murphy

K. M.

(2018). Should I stay or should I go? Teachers’ commitment to their work in juvenile corrections schools. The Journal of Correctional Education, 69(1), 4–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26508038

20.

Nagpaul

Chen

(2019). Self-determination theory as a framework for understanding needs of youth at-risk: Perspectives of social service professionals and the youth themselves. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.015

21.

Nowak

(2019). The United Nations global study on children deprived of liberty. United Nations.

22.

Sedivy-Benton

Boden-McGill

(2012). Unpacking the effects: Identifying school and teacher factors and their influence on teachers’ intentions to stay or leave the profession. Research in the Schools, 19(2), 75–89.

23.

Sheppard

K. G.

Wilson

M. M.

Reddick

L. H.

Tucker

G. O.

Schwab

A. H.

(2022). Reducing staff burnout and turnover intentions in juvenile justice residential commitment programs: The promise of trauma-informed care. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, 101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101979

24.

Sinclair

J. S.

Unruh

D. K.

Griller Clark

Waintrup

M. G.

(2017). School personnel perceptions of youth with disabilities returning to high school from the juvenile justice system. The Journal of Special Education, 51(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916676089

25.

Trainor

A. A.

Graue

(2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100

26.

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Teacher shortage areas. https://tsa.ed.gov/#/reports

27.

Vidal

Connell

C. M.

Prince

D. M.

Tebes

J. K.

(2018). Multisystem-involved youth: A developmental framework and implications for research, policy, and practice. Adolescent Research Review, 4(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0088-1

28.

Vroom

V. H.

(1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.

29.

Wang

Brinkworth

Eccles

(2013). Moderating effects of teacher–student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916

30.

Whitaker

Torres-Guillén

Morton

Jordan

Coyle

Mann

Sun

(2019). Cops and no counselors: How the lack of school mental health staff is harming students. American Civil Liberties Union. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=facultyshowcase

31.

Zee

Koomen

H. M.

(2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801