Coaching is an essential component of supporting teachers to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) in classrooms. The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI), an EBP designed to promote student self-determination, uses a research-based coaching model with six guiding principles. This qualitative study analyzed the content of coaching conversations between coaches and general and special education high school teachers implementing the SDLMI with autistic students to explore alignment with the guiding principles of the SDLMI coaching model. Findings highlighted the usefulness of the coaching principles in building trust between coaches and teachers, supporting teachers to set meaningful goals and build skills and competencies related to SDLMI implementation, promoting innovation and fidelity, and facilitating reflective dialogue. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
BillingsleyB. S.BettiniE. A.WilliamsT. O. (2019). Teacher racial/ethnic diversity: Distribution of special and general educators of color across schools. Remedial and Special Education, 40(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517733047
BurkeK. M.RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM.Mumbardó-AdamC.UyanikH.BehrensS. (2020). A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518802274
4.
DeanE. E.BurkeK. M.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2017). Promoting self-determination and integrated employment through the self-determined career development model. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0011-y
5.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.NaoomS. F.DudaM. A. (2013–2015). Implementation drivers: Assessing best practices. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
6.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication #231). The National Implementation Research Network.
7.
GarbaczS. A.LannieA. L.Jeffrey-PearsallJ. L.TruckenmillerA. J. (2015). Strategies for effective classroom coaching. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.942835
8.
GreenwoodC. R.AbbottM. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640102400403
9.
HagiwaraM.ShogrenK.LekoM. (2017). Reviewing research on the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Mapping the terrain and charting a course to promote adoption and use. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0007-7
10.
HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.LaneK. L.RaleyS. K.SmithS. A. (2020). Development of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction coaching model: Implications for research and practice. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 17–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26898711
11.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
12.
KiblenJ. C.ShogrenK. A.KurthJ. A.RaleyS. K. (2023). Tiered educational coaching to promote self-determination in the classroom. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
KiblenJ. C.ShogrenK. A.ScottL. A.KanD.BossenB.HumeK. (2023). Perspectives of autistic students, their peers, and their teachers on self-determination and peer support. Manuscript in preparation. submitted for publication
14.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
15.
KucharczykS.SzidonK.HallL. J. (2022). Coaching in complexity: Lessons learned investigating implementation of interventions in high schools. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 45(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434211041909
16.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782
17.
LyonA. R.BrunsE. J. (2019). From evidence to impact: Joining our best school mental health practices with our best implementation strategies. School Mental Health, 11(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-09306-w
18.
MaytonM. R.WheelerJ. J.MenendezA. L.ZhangJ. (2010). An analysis of evidence-based practices in the education and treatment of learners with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 539–551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879759
19.
National High School Center, National Center on Response to Intervention, & Center on Instruction. (2010). Tiered interventions in high schools: Using preliminary “lessons learned” to guide ongoing discussion. American Institutes for Research.
20.
PulosJ. M.MorinK. L.PeltierC.SinclairT. E.Williams-DiehmK. L. (2023). Effects of the SDLMI on academic and nonacademic behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-023-09508-6
21.
RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M.HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.KurthJ. A. (2020). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction and students with extensive support needs in inclusive settings. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-58.1.82
22.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.HagiwaraM. (2022). Review of existing research on coaching in inclusive, secondary classrooms. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 57(2), 151–166.
23.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.MatusevichH.QuirkC.SmithS.O’RourkeS. (2023). Building blocks for systems change: Using implementation science to enhance using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction as a universal support. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.RifenbarkG. G.LaneK. L.PaceJ. R. (2021). The impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination in inclusive, secondary classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 42(6), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520984842
25.
RaleyS. K.ShogrenK. A.RifenbarkG. G.ThomasK.McDonaldA. F.BurkeK. M. (2020). Enhancing secondary students’ goal attainment and self-determination in general education mathematics classes using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00152-z
26.
RoweD. A.MazzottiV. L.FowlerC. H.TestD. W.MitchellV. J.ClarkK. A.HolzbergD.OwensT. L.RusherD.Seaman-TullisR. L.GushanasC. M.CastleH.ChangW.-H.VoggtA.KwiatekS.DeanC. (2021). Updating the secondary transition research base: Evidence- and research-based practices in functional skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420958674
27.
ScottL. A. (2020). Reasons early career black special education teachers quit their positions. American Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 5(79), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.28933/ajerr-2020-11-2305
28.
ShogrenK. A.BurkeK. M. (2019). Teacher’s guide supplement: Supporting students with complex communication needs to engage with the SDLMI. Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
29.
ShogrenK. A.BurkeK. M.AntoshA. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaPlanteT.ShawL. A.RaleyS. K. (2019). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on self-determination and goal attainment in adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207318792178
30.
ShogrenK. A.PaceJ. R.HicksT. A.RaleyS. K.LaneK. L. (in press). Setting standards for SDLMI fidelity: Promoting data-driven decision making to advance self-determination instruction. Psychology in the Schools.
31.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K. (2018). Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI) fidelity measure. Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K.BurkeK. M.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Teacher’s guide. Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
34.
ShogrenK. A.RaleyS. K.RifenbarkG. G.LaneK. L.BojanekE. K.KarpurA.QuirkC. (2021). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Promoting implementation fidelity. Inclusion, 9(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-9.1.46
35.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.Forber-PrattA. J.LittleT. J.LopezS. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24827508
36.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913489733
37.
StahmerA. C.SuhrheinrichJ.SchetterP. L.McGee HassrickE. (2018). Exploring multi-level system factors facilitating educator training and implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP): A study protocol. Implementation Science, 13(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0698-1
38.
TraversJ. C.CookB. G.TherrienW. J.CoyneM. D. (2016). Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648462
39.
WaschbuschD. A.BreauxR. P.BabinskiD. E. (2019). School-based interventions for aggression and defiance in youth: A framework for evidence-based practice. School Mental Health, 11(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9269-0
40.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600401
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
