Investigating the extent to which professional organization standards reflect family–professional partnerships can identify opportunities for professional organizations to enrich a focus on partnerships, thus better-preparing education professionals to fulfill partnerships with families. The researchers employed a document analysis method to investigate two research questions: (a) What percentage of education professional organization standards and substandards reflect family–professional partnerships? and (b) To what extent do education professional organization substandards align with the five dimensions of family–professional partnerships? Key findings indicated that the (a) Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium and (b) National Association of School Psychologists had the greatest number of standards reflecting partnerships, and “commitment” was most frequently dimension reflected in substandards. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.
BakerT. L.WiseJ.KelleyG.SkibaR. J. (2016). Identifying barriers: Creating solutions to improve family engagement. The School Community Journal, 26(2), 161–184. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124003.pdf
2.
BettiniE. A.CheyneyK.WangJ.LekoC. (2015). Job design: An administrator’s guide to supporting and retaining special educators. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(4), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214532346
3.
Blue-BanningM.SummersJ. A.FranklandH. C.NelsonL. L.BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167e184. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000203
4.
BowenG. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
5.
BruïneE. D.WillemseT. M.FranssensJ.EyndeS. V.VloeberghsL.VandermarliereL. (2018). Small-scale curriculum changes for improving pre-service teachers’ preparation for Family-School Partnerships. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1465667
6.
Da FonteM. A.Barton-ArwoodS. M. (2017). Collaboration of general and special education teachers: Perspectives and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217693370
7.
DillonS.ArmstrongE.GoudyL.ReynoldsH.ScurryS. (2021). Improving special education service delivery through interdisciplinary collaboration. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 54(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599211029671
8.
EpsteinJ. L. (2001). School, family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Westview Press.
9.
EpsteinJ. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers’ professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1465669
10.
Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 USC § 6301 et seq. (2015).
11.
FrancisG. L.Blue-BanningM.TurnbullA. P.HainesS. J.GrossJ. M. S. (2016). Building “our school”: Parental perspectives for building trusting family-professional partnerships. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(4), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1164115
12.
FrancisG. L.KilpatrickA.HainesS. J.GershwinT.KyzarK. B.HossainI. (2021). Special education faculty decision-making regarding designing and delivering family-professional partnership content and skills in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103419
13.
GrossJ. M. S.HainesS. J.HillC.FrancisG. L.Blue-BanningM.TurnbullA. P. (2015). Strong school-community partnerships in inclusive schools are “part of the fabric of the school . . . we count on them.”School Community Journal, 25(2), 9–34. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085646.pdf
14.
HainesS. J.FrancisG. L.MuellerT. G.ChiuC.BurkeM. M.KyzarK.ShepherdK. G.HoldrenN.AlderseyH. M.TurnbullA. P. (2017). Reconceptualizing family-professional partnership for inclusive schools: A call to action. Inclusion, 5(4), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-5.4.234
15.
Hoover-DempseyK. V.WalkerJ. M. T.SandlerH. M.WhetselD.GreenC. L.WilkinsA. S.ClossonK. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and Implications. The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105–130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/499194
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 USC § 1400 et seq. (1975, 2004).
17.
JeynesW. H. (2016). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and African American school outcomes. Journal of Black Studies, 47(3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934715623522
18.
JeynesW. H. (2017). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and Latino student outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 49(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516630596
19.
KyzarK. B.MuellerT. G.FrancisG. L.HainesS. J. (2019). Special education teacher preparation for family-professional partnerships: Results from a national survey of teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419839123
20.
MuellerT. G. (2015). Litigation and special education: The past, present, and future direction for resolving conflicts between parents and school districts. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 26(3), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073145333
National Association of School Psychologists. (2019). NASP position statement: School-family partnering to enhance learning: Essential elements and responsibilities. https://www.nasponline.org/x26822.xml
23.
O’ConnerE. A.YasikA. E.HornerS. L. (2016). Teachers’ knowledge of special education laws: What do they know?Insights into Learning Disabilities, 13(1), 7–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103671.pdf
ShepherdK. G.FowlerS.McCormickJ.WilsonC. L.MorganD. (2016). The search for role clarity: Challenges and implications for special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840641663790
26.
StrassfeldN. M. (2019). Preparing pre-service special education teachers to facilitate parent involvement, knowledge, and advocacy: Considerations for curriculum. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064188066
27.
Strickland-CohenM. K.KyzarK. B.Garza-FraireF. M. (2021). School-family partnerships to support positive behavior: Assessing social validity and intervention fidelity. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 65(4), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1913084
28.
TurnbullA.TurnbullR.FrancisG. L.BurkeM.KyzarK.HainesS. J.GershwinT.ShepherdK. G.HoldrenN.SingerG. (2021). Families and professionals: Trusting partnerships in general and special education (8th ed.). Pearson.
29.
TurnbullA.TurnbullR.FrancisG. L.ErwinE. J.SoodakL. C.ShogrenK. A. (2015). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (7th ed.). Pearson.
30.
WebbN. L. (2007). Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 7–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957340709336728
31.
WolfeK.DuránL. K. (2013). Culturally and linguistically diverse parents’ perceptions of the IEP process: A review of current research. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13(2), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.5555/muvo.13.2.y452140732mlg231
32.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
