This review examines some of the critical factors that influenced the evolution of rehabilitation counselor education accreditation. The article discusses the history and structure of the accreditation process and the activities that have occurred to maintain the relevancy and viability of the process. Major issues that the Council on Rehabilitation Education (CORE) has addressed in recent years are highlighted and examples are provided to illustrate the scope and importance of the accreditation process. Commentary is included to help the reader understand the issues that CORE will be addressing and the directions that may become priorities in the future.
Chan, F., Leahy, M.J., Saunders, J.L., Tarvydas, V., Ferrin, J.M., & Lee, G. (2003). Training needs of certified rehabilitation counselors for contemporary practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 46, 82-91.
2.
Council on Rehabilitation Education. (2004 ). Accreditation manual for rehabilitation counselor education programs. Rolling Meadows, IL: Author.
3.
Council on Rehabilitation Education. (2008 ). Undergraduate education. Rolling Meadows, IL: Author. Retrieved August 8, 2008, from http://www.core-rehab.org/UndergradEd.html
4.
Evenson, T., & Holloway, L. (2000). Competencies of baccalaureate-level rehabilitation workers in community rehabilitation programs. Rehabilitation Education, 15, 115-132.
5.
Evenson, T., & Holloway, L. (2006). The state of rehabilitation undergraduate education: A survey of undergraduate coordinators. Rehabilitation Education , 20, 103-114.
6.
Glenn, M.K. (2006). A rehabilitation educator's perspective on merging accreditation resources. Rehabilitation Education, 20, 71-78.
7.
Herbert, J.T. (2006). Accreditation options for the undergraduate rehabilitation program. Rehabilitation Education, 20, 179-190.
8.
Kaplan, D. (2008, January). 20/20: A vision for the future of counseling . Paper presented at the American Association of State Counseling Boards annual conference, New Orleans, LA.
9.
Lane, F. (2007, Fall). CORE-CACREP merger: Update. ARCA Newsletter, pp. 1-2, 7. Retrieved March 21, 2008, from http://www.arcaweb.org/Portals/0/pdf/ARCA2007Fall.pdf
10.
Leahy, M.J. (2002). The 60-hour credit requirement: An educational standard whose time has come. Rehabilitation Education, 16, 381-387.
11.
Leahy, M.J., Chan, F., & Saunders, J.L. (2003). Job functions and knowledge requirements of Certified Rehabilitation Counselors in the 21st century. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 66-81.
12.
Leahy, M. J., & Szymanski, E. M. (Eds.). (1993). Rehabilitation counseling credentialing: Research and practice. [Special joint issue]. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37(2), 65-200, and Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 24(4), 2-80.
13.
Linkowski, D.C., & Szymanski, E.M. (1993). Accreditation in rehabilitation counseling: Historical and current context and process. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37, 81-91.
Shaw, L.R. (2006, February). CORE: Current status and future directions . Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Council on Rehabilitation Education, San Diego, CA.
19.
Shaw, L.R. (2007, July 25). Follow-up message regarding the recent CORE-CACREP board actions. Message posted to NCRE mailing list, reprinted at http://nationalrehab.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=2.
20.
Shaw, L.R., Evenson, T., Kuehn, M., & Turner-Whittaker, T. (2008, February). CORE open forum . Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Council on Rehabilitation Education, San Antonio, TX.
