Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings are an important component of special education; however, few students actually attend and meaningfully participate in their meetings. Using a large-scale national survey, this study examined student attendance and participation at IEP meetings and the predictors of these outcomes. Respondents were 1,183 parents of students with disabilities across all grade levels. Results indicated that only a third of students attended their most recent IEP meeting. Most students who did attend their meeting were not actively participating. Results from a factor analysis of participatory behaviors challenge previous conceptualizations of student participation. Predictors of student involvement included strength of the parent–teacher partnership, as well as certain student characteristics related to grade and disability type. Implications are discussed.
Barnard-BrakL.LechtenbergerD. (2010). Student IEP participation and academic achievement across time. Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509338382
2.
BarrioB. L.MillerD.HsiaoY.DunnM.PetersenS.HollingsheadA.BanksS. (2017). Designing culturally responsive and relevant individualized education programs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(2), 114–119.
3.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving employment outcomes for students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.
4.
BlackwellW. H.RossettiZ. (2014). The development of individualized education programs: Where have we been and where should we go now?SAGE Open, 4, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014530411
5.
Blue-BanningM.SummersJ. A.FranklandH. C.NelsonL. L.BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000203
6.
BrownT. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
7.
BruininksR. H.WoodcockR. W.WeathermanR. E.HillB. K. (1996). Scales of Independent Behavior–Revised comprehensive manual. Riverside Publishing.
8.
Cease-CookJ.TestD. W.ScrogginsL. (2013). Effects of the CD-ROM version of the Self-Advocacy Strategy on quality of contributions in IEP meetings of high school students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 258–268.
9.
ChandrooR.StrnadovaI.CummingT. M. (2018). A systematic review of the involvement of students with autism spectrum disorder in the transition planning process. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 83(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.07.011
10.
CobbC. (2014). Critical entanglement: Research on culturally and linguistically diverse parental involvement in special education. Exceptional Education International, 23(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v23i1.7703
11.
DahlG. B.LochnerL. (2012). The impact of family income on child achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1927–1956.
12.
de BreyC.MusuL.McFarlandJ.Wilkinson-FlickerS.DilibertiM.ZhangA.BranstetterC.WangX. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/
13.
deFurS. (2012). Parents as collaborators: Building partnerships with school- and community-based providers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(3), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204400307
14.
GoldmanS. E.BurkeM. M. (2017). The effectiveness of interventions to increase parent involvement in special education: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Exceptionality, 26(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196444
15.
GriffinM. M.TaylorJ. L.UrbanoR. C.HodappR. M. (2014). Involvement in transition planning meetings among high school students with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 47(4), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913475668
16.
HarrellF. E. (2015). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Springer.
17.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.ThielkeR.PayneJ.GonzalezN. N.CondeJ. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Information, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
18.
HarryB. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 372–388.
19.
HodappR. M.RosemergyJ.GarciaB. L.MeskisS. A.HartM.McMillanE. (2018). Information and Referral services in IDD: Toward integrated and comprehensive services?International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 54, 211–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irrdd.2018.07.007
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1440 et seq. (2004).
21.
KelleyK. R.BartholomewA.TestD. W. (2011). Effects of the Self-Directed IEP delivered using computer-assisted instruction on student participation in educational planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 34(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511415864
22.
KoD.WaweneD.RobertsK.HongJ. J. (2020). A systematic review of boundary-crossing partnerships in designing equity-oriented special education services for culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 1–14. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520983474
23.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H.MaxsonL. M.JermanP. L. (1996). The self-directed IEP. Sopris West.
24.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H.SaleP. (2004). A 3-year study of middle, junior high, and high school IEP meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000302
25.
MartinJ. E.Van DykeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovvettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200303
26.
MartinJ. E.VanDykeJ. L.GreeneB. A.GardenerJ. E.ChristensenW. R.WoodsL. L.LovettD. L. (2006). Direct observation of teacher-directed IEP meetings: Establishing the need for student IEP meeting instruction. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200204
27.
MsallM.OttenbacherK.DuffyL.LyonN.HeyerN.PhillipsL.HardB. J.BraunS.GrangerC. (1996). Reliability and validity of the WeeFIM in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Pediatric Research, 39, 378. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199604001-02276
28.
PowersK.Gil-KashiwabaraE.GeenenS.PowersL.BalandranJ.PalmerC. (2005). Mandates and effective transition planning practices reflected in IEPs. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/08857288050280010701
29.
RossettiZ.SauerJ. S.BuiO.OuS. (2017). Developing collaborative partnerships with culturally and linguistically diverse families during the IEP process. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916680103
30.
SandersonK. A.GoldmanS. E. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to increase adolescent IEP meeting participation. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 43(3), 157–168.
31.
ShogrenK. A.PlotnerA. J. (2012). Transition planning for students with intellectual disability, autism, or other disabilities: Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-50.1.16
32.
StaplesK. E.DilibertoJ. A. (2010). Guidelines for successful parent involvement: Working with parents of students with disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200607
33.
SummersJ. A.HoffmanL.MarquisJ.TurnbullA.PostonD.NelsonL. L. (2005). Measuring the quality of family-professional partnerships in special education services. Exceptional Children, 72(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507200104
34.
TestD. W.MasonC.HughesC.KonradM.NealeM.WoodW. M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000401
35.
ValenzuelaR. L.MartinJ. L. (2005). Self-directed IEP: Bridging values of diverse cultures and secondary education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28(1), 4–14.
36.
Van ReusenA. K.BosC. S.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1994). The self-advocacy strategy for education and transition planning. Edge Enterprises.
37.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.JavitzH.ValdesK. (2012). A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(3), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311425384
38.
WeidenthalC.Kochlar-BryantC. (2007). The need for early planning: Investigation of transition practices for middle school youth. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 147–157. https://doi.og/10.1177/08857288070300030401
39.
Williams-DiehmK.WehmeyerM.PalmerS.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 25–36.
40.
WolfeK.DuránL. K. (2013). Culturally and linguistically diverse parents’ perceptions of the IEP process: A review of current research. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13(2), 4–18.
