The purpose of this study was to support the development of mathematics and self-determination skills of young adults with extensive support needs. Mathematical problem solving is a natural context for teaching two component skills of self-determination: self-monitoring and goal setting. Three young adults with extensive support needs (i.e., autism and intellectual disability) were taught to solve real-world thematic word problems using modified schema-based instruction (MSBI). To build self-determination skills, participants self-monitored completion of problem-solving steps using a task analysis, self-graphed steps completed independently correct and then set goals for subsequent sessions. Generalization was measured within the context of scaling ingredients from a recipe without instructional supports of a task analysis or graphic organizer. Results of the multiple probe across participants design indicate a functional relation between MSBI and steps of problem solving completed independently correct. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.LoY. Y.SaundersA. F.RootJ. R.Ley DavisL.BroshC. R. (2018). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 51, 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
2.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. A. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 50–63.
CourtadeG. R.TestD. W.CookB. G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for learners with severe intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 305–318.
6.
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District RE-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017).
7.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309334431
8.
GrigalM.HartD.WeirC. (2012). A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 223–233.
9.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WorleyM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
10.
JitendraA. K.Peterson-BrownS.LeinA. E.ZaslofskyA. F.KunkelA. K.JungP.-G.EganA. M. (2015). Teaching mathematical word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413487408
11.
KnightV. F.SartiniE. (2015). A comprehensive literature review of comprehension strategies in core content areas for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1213–1229.
12.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
13.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
14.
MagiatiI.TayX. W.HowlinP. (2014). Cognitive, language, social and behavioral outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of longitudinal follow-up studies in adulthood. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 73–86.
15.
MillerB.DoughtyT.KrockoverG. (2015). Using science inquiry methods to promote self-determination and problem-solving skills for students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 356–368.
16.
NasamranA.WitmerS. E.LosJ. E. (2017). Exploring predictors of postsecondary outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 343–356.
17.
ParkJ. P.BouckE. (2018). In-school service predictors of employment for individuals with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 77, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.03.014
18.
RootJ. R.BrowderD. M. (2019). Algebraic problem solving for middle school students with autism and intellectual disability. Exceptionality, 27, 118–132.
19.
RootJ. R.CoxS. K.HammonsN.SaundersA. F.GilleyD. (2018). Contextualizing mathematics: Teaching problem solving to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56, 442–457.
20.
RootJ. R.KnightV. F.MimsP. J. (2017). A guide to addressing multiple priorities in core content instruction for students with severe disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40, 56–61.
21.
SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M.RootJ. R. (2017). Teaching mathematics and science to students with intellectual disability. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 343–364). Routledge.
22.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2015). Raising the bar: Significant advances and future needs for promoting learning for students with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 28–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932514555022
23.
SpoonerF.McKissickB. R.KnightV. F. (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42, 8–18.
24.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 150–165.
25.
SpoonerF.SaundersA.RootJ. R.BroshC. (2017). Promoting access to common core mathematics for students with severe disabilities through mathematical problem solving. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42, 171–186. https://doi.org/1540796917697119
26.
StokesT. F.BaerD. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
27.
Taber-DoughtyT. (2015). STEM for students with severe disabilities. School Science and Mathematics, 115, 153–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12122
28.
Taber-DoughtyT. A.SeltzerA.HeflinL.AlbertoP. A. (1999). Use of self-operated auditory prompts to decrease off-task behavior for a student with autism and moderate mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 159–166.
29.
TurnbullH. R.TurnbullA. P.CooperD. H. (2018). The Supreme Court, Endrew, and the appropriate education of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 84, 124–140.
30.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Digest of education statistics, 2019. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest
31.
Van de WalleJ. A.KarpK. S.Bay-WilliamsJ. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics (7th ed.). Pearson.
32.
WellsJ. C.SheeheyP. H.SheeheyM. (2017). Using self-monitoring of performance with self-graphing to increase academic productivity in math. Beyond Behavior, 26, 57–65.
