Students with and at-risk for academic and behavioral challenges often have low levels of academic engagement. Providing instructional choice is one way to increase engagement in the classroom. In this study, we replicated and extended previous inquiry by investigating the effects of across-activity choices offered by third-grade teachers during reading instruction to participating students with behavioral (one with internalizing and two with internalizing and externalizing patterns) and academic needs. Using a standardized professional development module, teachers learned to implement instructional choice during reading instruction while collecting direct observation data on a student’s academic engagement. Teachers implemented practices with integrity and collected momentary time sampling data for one student in their classroom with high levels of reliability. Results of a withdrawal design indicated a functional relation between the introduction of instructional choice and increases in the academic engagement for the three students. Teachers and students rated the intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes as acceptable. Limitations and future directions are presented.
BrieschA. M.HemphillE. M.VolpeR. J.DanielsB. (2015). An evaluation of observation methods for measuring response to classwide intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 37–49. doi:10.1037/spq0000065
2.
CookB. G.SchirmerB. R. (2006). An overview and analysis of the role of evidence-based practices in special education. In CookB. G.SchirmerB. R. (Eds.), What is special about special education: The role of evidence-based practices (pp. 175–185). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
3.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Author.
4.
DibleyS.LimL. (1999). Providing choice making opportunities: Within and between daily school routines. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 117–132. doi:10.1023/A:1022888917128
5.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
6.
EnnisR. P.JolivetteK.FredrickL. D.AlbertoP. A. (2013). Using comparison peer behavior as an objective measure of social validity: Recommendations for researchers. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 195–201. doi:10.1177/1088357612475078
7.
EnnisR. P.LaneK. L.OakesW. P. (2018a). Empowering teachers with low intensity strategies: Self-monitoring in an elementary resource classroom. Preventing School Failure, 62, 176–189. doi:10.1080/1045988X20171408055
8.
EnnisR. P.LaneK. L.OakesW. P. (2018b). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support instruction: Implementing within-activity choices in third-grade math with null effects. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 77–94. doi:10.1177/0741932517734634
9.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC.FrancisD. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of LD: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545–552. doi:10.1177/00222194050380061101
10.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F. N.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 4–18. doi:10.1177/1063426611401624
11.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improve-ment System–Rating Scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
12.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N.VanceM. J.CookC. R. (2011). Comparability of the social skills rating system to the Social Skills Improvement System: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 27–44. doi:10.1037/a0022662
13.
HarrisonJ. R.VannestK.DavisJ.ReynoldsC. (2012). Common problem behaviors of children and adolescents in general education classrooms in the United States. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 55–64. doi:10.1177/1063426611421157
14.
JohnsB. H.CrowleyE. P.GuetzloeE. (2008). Engaged time in the classroom. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–6.
15.
JolivetteK.StichterJ. P.McCormickK. M. (2002). Making choices—improving behavior—engaging in learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 24–30.
16.
JolivetteK.StichterJ. P.SibiliskyS.ScottT. M.RidgleyR. (2002). Naturally occurring opportunities for preschool children with and without disabilities to make choices. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 397–414.
17.
KauchakD.EggenP. (1993). Learning and teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
LaneK. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/behavioral disorders: 1990 to present. In RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M.MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 462–486). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
LaneK. L. (2009). Comprehensive, integrated three-tiered model of prevention: Treatment integrity teacher self-report form (Ci3T TI: TSR). Available from www.ci3t.org/measures
20.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M. (2009). Student Risk Screening Scale for Early Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior (SRSS-IE) (Screening scale). Available from Ci3t.org/screening
21.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.BezdekJ. (2013). School-wide systems to promote positive behaviors and facilitate instruction. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7, 6-31. doi: 10.3776/joci.2013.v7n1p6-31
22.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2015). Supporting behavior for school success: A step-by-step guide to key strategies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2018). Effective low-intensity strategies to enhance school success: What every educator needs to know. Beyond Behavior, 27, 128–133. doi:10.1177/1074295618799360
24.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.LambertW.CoxM. L.HankinsK. (2012). A validation of the Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors: Patterns in rural and urban elementary schools. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 244–270. doi:10.17988/0198-7429-40.3.159
25.
LaneK. L.OakesW.EnnisR. P.HirschS. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have Tier 2 and Tier 3 needs?Preventing School Failure, 58, 171–182. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.895573
26.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.EnnisR. P. (2012). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support instruction self-assessment: Knowledge, Confidence, and Use. Unpublished rating scale.
27.
LaneK. L.RoyerD. J.MessengerM.CommonE.EnnisR. P.SwoggerE. D. (2015). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support academic engagement: Implementation and effects of instructional choice for elementary students in inclusive settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 473–504. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0013
28.
LedfordJ.GastD. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
MessengerM.LaneK. L.CommonE.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M.CantwellE. D.EnnisR. P. (2017). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support student engagement: Increasing opportunities to respond for students with internalizing behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 170–184. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0013
30.
MichaelJ. (2007). Motivating operations. In CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 374–391). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
31.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Digest of educational statistics, 2011. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest
32.
Renaissance Learning. (2016). STAR 360 assessments. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
33.
RispoliM.LangR.NeelyL.CamargoS.HutchinsN.DavenportK.Goodwyi1F. (2013). A comparison of within- and across-task choices for reducing challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 66–83. doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9164-y
34.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.MessengerM. L. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K-12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 89–107. doi:10.1177/01987429166886
35.
SattlerJ. M. (1991). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Sattler.
36.
ShapiroE. S. (2013). Academic skills problems workbook (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
37.
ShogrenK. A.Faggella-LubyM. N.BaeS. J.WehmeyerM. L. (2004). The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 228–237. doi:10.1177/10983007040060040401
38.
SkerbetzM. D.KostewiczD. E. (2013). Academic choice for included students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57, 212–222. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2012.701252
WagnerM.CametoR. (2004). The characteristics, experiences, and outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances (NLTS2 Data Brief, 3). Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/173008
41.
WechslerD. (2014). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (5th ed.). London, England: Pearson Assessment.
42.
WehbyJ. H.MagginD. M.JohnsonL.SymonsF. J. (2010). Improving intervention implementation and fidelity in evidence-based practice: Integrating teacher preference into intervention selection. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Retrieved from https://scinapse.io/papers/1451135
43.
WittJ. C.ElliottS. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
