Based on the complex dynamic system approach, this research aimed to study the variability of the typical configurations of interactions between the adults’ participation and the engagement of a child with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in two activities proposed in a French preschool. The classroom sessions were filmed once a month for 8 months and focused on two activities (free play and adult-led activities). The results of this preliminary exploration revealed that the typical interactions developed differently over time. Indeed, during activities that are adult led, observation behaviors with a passive participation of the adult intensified. Moreover, active engagement behaviors, without and with adult participation, increased meaningfully during free play.
AinscowM. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change?Journal of Educational Change, 6, 109–124. doi:10.1007/s10833-005-1298-4
2.
AndersonA.MooreD.GodfreyR.FletcherC. (2004). Social skills assessment of children with autism in free-play situations. Autism, 8, 369–385. doi:10.1177/1362361304045216
3.
BoothT.AinscowM. (2000). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
4.
BrownW. H.OdomS. L.LiS.ZercherC. (1999). Ecobehavioral assessment in early childhood programs: A portrait of preschool inclusion. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 138–153. doi:10.1177/002246699903300302
5.
GiangrecoM. F. (2013). Teacher assistant supports in inclusive schools: Research, practices and alternatives. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 37, 93–106. doi:10.1017/jse.2013.1
6.
GillisJ.ButlerR. (2007). Social skills interventions for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder: A description of single-subject design studies. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4, 532–547. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0014-9
7.
GranicI.HollensteinT. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 641–669. doi:10.1017.S0954579403000324
8.
GuastelloS. J.KoopmansM.PincusD. (2009). Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HollensteinT. (2007). State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 384–396. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5007-8_2
10.
KempC.KishidaY.CarterM.SwellerN. (2012). The effect of activity type on the engagement and interaction of young children with disabilities in inclusive childcare settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 134–143. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.03.003
11.
KishidaY.KempC. (2006). A measure of engagement for children with intellectual disabilities in early childhood settings: A preliminary study. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31, 99–112. doi:10.1080/13668250600710823
12.
KishidaY.KempC. (2009). The engagement and interaction of children with autism spectrum disorder in segregated and inclusive early childhood center-based settings. Topic in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 105–118. doi:10.1177/0271121408329172
13.
KoopmansM.StamovlasisD. (Eds.). (2016). Complex dynamical systems in education: Concepts, methods and applications. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27577-2
14.
LewisM. D.LameyA. V.DouglasL. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 458–476. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00090
15.
MahoneyG.MacDonaldJ. (2007). Autism and developmental delays in young children: The responsive teaching curriculum for parents and professionals. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
16.
MainhardM. T.PenningsH. J. M.WubbelsT.BrekelmansM. (2012). Mapping control and affiliation in teacher-student interaction with state space grids. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1027–1037. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.04.008
17.
McWilliamR. A.BaileyJ. D. B. (1995). Effects of classroom social structure and disability on engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 123–147. doi:10.1177/027112149501500201
18.
McWilliamR. A.ScarboroughA. A.KimH. (2003). Adult interactions and child engagement. Early Education and Child Development, 14, 7–28. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1401_2
19.
McWilliamR. A.TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J. (1985). Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 59–71. doi:10.1016/S0270-4684(85)80006-9
20.
OdomS. L. (2000). Preschool inclusion: What we know and where we go from here. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 1–27. doi:10.1177/027112140002000104
21.
OdomS. L.BrownW. H.SchwartzI. S.ZercherC.SandallS. R. (2002). Classroom ecology and child participation. In OdomS. L. (Ed.), Widening the circle: Including children with disabilities in preschool programs (pp. 25–45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
PenningsH. J. M.BrekelmansM.WubbelsT.van der WantA. C.ClaessensL. C. A.van TartwijkJ. (2014). A nonlinear dynamical systems approach to real-time teacher behavior: Differences between teachers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18, 23–45.
23.
PowellD. R.BurchinalM. R.FileN.KontosS. (2008). An eco-behavioral analysis of children’s engagement in urban public school preschool classrooms. Early Child Research Quarterly, 23, 108–123. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.04.001
24.
ReszkaS. S.OdomS. L.HumeK. (2012). Ecological features of preschools and the social engagement of children with autism. Journal of Early Intervention, 34, 40–56. doi:10.1177/1053815112452596
25.
RuijsN. M.PeetsmaT. T. (2009). Effects of inclusion on students with and without special educational needs reviewed. Educational Research Review, 4, 67–79. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.02.002
26.
SamA. M.ReszkaS. S.BoydB. A.PanY.HumeK.OdomS. L. (2016). The association between adult participation and the engagement of preschoolers with ASD. Autism Research and Treatment, 24(2), 1–10. doi:10.1155/2016/6029837
27.
SteenbeckH.JansenL.van GeertP. (2012). Scaffolding dynamics during instruction and its role in the emergence of problematic learning trajectories: A case study based on the dynamic systems framework. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 64–75. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.014
28.
SteinbrennerJ. R. D.WatsonL. R. (2015). Student engagement in the classroom: The impact of classroom, teacher, and student factors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2392–2410. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2406-9
29.
TrippT. R.RichP. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 728–739. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011
