This study examined, using data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2, the impact of constructs associated with self-determination (i.e., autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment measured while youth were in secondary school) on postschool—(a) employment and payment/benefits, (b) education, (c) independent living, and (d) social engagement—outcomes. Findings suggest that up to 8 years after youth exited school, autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment predict postschool outcomes. Psychological empowerment showed a strong relationship with employment wages and benefits, and autonomy and self-realization contributed to predicting independent living and postsecondary education enrollment. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
4.
BerryH. G.WardM.CaplanL. (2012). Self-determination and access to postsecondary education in transitioning youths receiving supplemental security income benefits. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 68–75.
5.
BrownM. W. (1984). Asymptotic distribution free methods in the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.
6.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
CarterE. W.AustinD.TrainorA. (2012). Predictors of postschool employment outcomes for young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 50–63. doi:10.1177/1044207311414680
8.
CarterE. W.TrainorA. A.CakirogluO.ColeO.SwedeenB.DitchmanN.OwensL. (2009). Exploring school-employer partnerships to expand career development and early work experiences for youth with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 145–159.
9.
DorenB.GauJ. M.LindstromL. E. (2012). The relationship between parent expectations and postschool outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 79, 7–23. doi:10.1177/001440291207900101
10.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.DudaM. A.NaoomS. F.Van DykeM. (2010). Sustainability of evidence-based programs in education. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 11, 30–46.
11.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.NaoomS. F.WallaceF. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 531–540. doi:10.1177/1049731509335549
12.
FloraD. B.CurranP. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.
13.
GarberoglioC. L.SchoffstallS.CawthonS.BondM.GeJ. (2014). The role of self-beliefs in predicting postschool outcomes for deaf young adults. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 667–688. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9388-y
14.
JavitzH.WagnerM. (2005). Analysis of potential bias in the Wave 1 and Wave 2 respondents to the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
15.
LernerR. M.EasterbrooksM.MistryJ. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology (Vol. 6). New York, NY: John Wiley.
16.
LombardiA.DorenB.GauJ. M.LindstromL. E. (2013). The influence of instructional settings in reading and math on postsecondary participation. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24, 170–180. doi:10.1177/1044207312468766
17.
MartinJ. E.van DyckeJ. L.ChristensenW. R.GreeneB. A.GardnerJ. E.LovettD. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.
18.
MuthénB. O.du ToitS.SpisicD. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
20.
Neely-BarnesS.MarcenkoM.WeberL. (2008). Does choice influence quality of life for people with mild intellectual disabilities?Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 46, 12–26. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2008)46[12:DCIQOL]2.0.CO;2
21.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school (A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 [NLTS2; NCSER 2011-3005]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
22.
PetcuS. D.Van HornM. L.ShogrenK. A. (in press). Self-determination and the enrollment in and completion of postsecondary education for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals.
23.
RojewskiJ. W.LeeI. H.GreggN. (2015). Causal effects of inclusion on postsecondary education outcomes of individuals with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 210–219. doi:10.1177/1044207313505648
24.
SetterstenR. A.FurstenbergF. F.RumbautR. G. (Eds.). (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.Garnier VillarrealM.LittleT. D. (2014). Exploring essential characteristics of self-determination for diverse students using data from NLTS2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37, 168–176.
26.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.LittleT. D. (2014). Autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization: Exploring data on self-determination from NLTS2. Exceptional Children, 80, 221–235.
27.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2016a). The impact of personal factors on self-determination and early adulthood outcome constructs in youth with disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A. (2016b). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment in predicting early adulthood outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 55–62. doi:10.1177/0741932515585003
29.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A.LittleT. D. (in press). Measuring the early adulthood outcomes of young adults with disabilities: Developing constructs using NLTS2 data. Exceptionality.
30.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.RifenbarkG. G.LittleT. D. (2015). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41. doi:10.1177/0022466913489733
31.
StapletonL. M. (2006). An assessment of practical solutions for structural equation modeling with complex sample data. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 28–58.
32.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ.C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
33.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.. . . KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859
34.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
35.
TicháR.LakinK. C.LarsonS. A.StancliffeR. J.TaubS.EnglerJ.. . . MoseleyC. (2012). Correlates of everyday choice and support-related choice for 8,892 randomly sampled adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in 19 states. Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 50, 486–504. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-50.06.486
36.
TrachJ. S.OertleK. M.PlotnerA. J. (2014). Transition from school through process to outcomes. In StrauserD. (Ed.), Career development, employment and disability in rehabilitation: From theory to practice (pp. 389–400). New York, NY: Springer.
37.
TrainorA. A.LindstromL.Simon-BurroughsM.MartinJ. E.SorrellsA. M. (2008). From marginalized to maximized opportunities for diverse youths with disabilities: A position paper of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 56–64.
38.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
39.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_07/nlts2_report_2006_07_complete.pdf
40.
WehmeyerM. L. (2003a). A functional theory of self-determination: Definition and categorization. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 174–181). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
41.
WehmeyerM. L. (2003b). A functional theory of self-determination: Model overview. In WehmeyerM. L.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 182–201). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
42.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
43.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
44.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.ShogrenK. A.Williams-DiehmK.SoukupJ. H. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 195–210. doi:10.1177/0022466910392377
45.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
46.
WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.Williams-DiehmK.LittleT. D.BoultonA. (2012). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination: A randomized-trial placebo control group study. Exceptional Children, 78, 135–153.
