We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to establish the evidence base for using visual activity schedules (VAS) with individuals with intellectual disability. Literature published after 2005 was evaluated for quality using the criteria developed by Horner et al.; a total of 14 studies were included as acceptable. Findings suggest that VAS is an evidence-based practice for teaching a variety of daily living, navigation, vocational, recreation, and academic skills to adolescents and adults with intellectual disability. Results also show increases in independence and on-task behaviors. We conclude the article by discussing limitations and recommendations for future research.
*AlbertoP. A.CihakD. F.GamaR. I. (2005). Use of static picture prompts versus video modeling during simulation instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 327–339.
2.
BelliniS.AkullianJ. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 261–284.
3.
BoppK. D.BrownK. E.MirendaP. (2004). Speech-language pathologists’ roles in the delivery of positive behavior support for individuals with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 5–19.
4.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–209.
5.
BryanL. C.GastD. L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553–567.
6.
*CarsonK. D.GastD. L.AyresK. M. (2008). Effects of a photo activity schedule book on independent task changes by students with intellectual disabilities in community and school job sites. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23, 269–279.
7.
*ChanJ. M.LambdinL.GrahamK.FragaleC.DavisT. (2014). A picture-based activity schedule intervention to teach adults with mild intellectual disability to use an iPad during a leisure activity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 247–257.
8.
*CihakD.AlbertoP. A.Taber-DoughtyT.GamaR. I. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 89–99.
9.
*DuttlingerC.AyresK. M.Bevill-DavisA.DouglasK. H. (2013). The effects of a picture activity schedule for students with intellectual disability to complete a sequence of tasks following verbal directions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 32–43.
10.
*EdrisinhaC.O’ReillyM. F.ChoiH. Y.SigafoosJ.LancioniG. E. (2011). “Say cheese:” Teaching photography skills to adults with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 636–642.
11.
GardnerS.WolfeP. (2013). Use of video modeling and video prompting interventions for teaching daily living skills to individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 73–87.
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
13.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.LewisT. (2015). Is school-side positive behavior support an evidence-based practice? Retrieved from https://www.pbis.org/research
14.
JamesonJ. M.McDonnellJ.JohnsonJ. W.RiesenT. J.PolychronisS. (2007). A comparison of one-to-one embedded instruction in the general education classroom and one-to-one massed practice instruction in the special education classroom. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 23–44.
15.
*KelleyK. R.TestD. W.CookeN. L. (2013). Effects of picture prompts delivered by a video iPod on pedestrian navigation. Exceptional Children, 79, 459–474.
16.
KnightV. F.SartiniE.SpriggsA. D. (2015). Evaluating visual activity schedules as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 157–178.
17.
KoyamaT.WangH. T. (2011). Use of activity schedule to promote independent performance of individuals with autism and other intellectual disabilities: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2235–2242.
18.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
19.
MacDuffG. S.KrantzP. J.McClannahanL. E. (2001). Prompts and prompt-fading strategies for people with autism. In MauriceC.GreenG.FoxxR. M. (Eds.), Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism (pp. 37–50). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
20.
MechlingL. C.AyresK. M.BryantK. J.FosterA. L. (2014). Continuous video modeling to assist with completion of multi-step home living tasks by young adults with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 368–380.
21.
*MechlingL. C.GastD. L.SeidN. H. (2010). Evaluation of a personal digital assistant as a self-prompting device for increasing multi-step task completion by students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 422–439.
22.
*MechlingL. C.GustafsonM. (2009). Comparison of the effects of static picture and video prompting on completion of cooking related tasks by students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Exceptionality, 17, 103–116.
23.
*MechlingL. C.SeidN. H. (2011). Use of a hand-held personal digital assistant (PDA) to self-prompt pedestrian travel by young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 220–237.
24.
*MechlingL. C.StephensE. (2009). Comparison of self-prompting of cooking skills via picture-based cookbooks and video recipes. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 218–236.
25.
MillerU.TestD. (1989). A comparison of constant time delay and most-to-least prompting in teaching laundry skills to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 24, 363–370.
26.
MimsP. J.HudsonM.BrowderD. M. (2012). The effects of systematic instruction on teaching comprehension skills during a biography to students with significant intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disability, 27, 67–80.
27.
National Autism Center. (2009). The National Autism Center’s national standards report. Randolph, MA: Author.
28.
PurrazzellaK.MechlingL. C. (2013). Use of an iPhone 4 with video features to assist location of students with moderate intellectual disability when lost in community settings. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 178–189.
29.
*RouseC. A.Everhart-SherwoodJ. M.Alber-MorganS. R. (2014). Effects of self-monitoring and recruiting teacher attention on pre-vocational skills. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 313–327.
30.
SmithB. R.SpoonerF.JimenezB.BrowderD. M. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 1–31.
31.
SnellM. E.ChenL.-Y.HooverK. (2006). Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disability: A review of intervention research 1997-2003. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 203–214.
32.
*SpriggsA. D.GastD. L.AyresK. M. (2007). Using picture activity schedule books to increase on-schedule and on-task behaviors. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 209–223.
33.
SpriggsA. D.KnightV. F.SherrowL. (2015). Talking picture schedules: Embedding video models into visual activity schedules to increase independence for students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Special Issue: Robotics, Technology, and Computer Assistance, 45, 3846-386. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2315-3
34.
StromerR.KimballJ. W.KinneyE. M.TaylorB. A. (2006). Activity schedules, computer technology, and teaching children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 14–24.
35.
*Taber-DoughtyT. (2005). Considering student choice when selecting instructional strategies: A comparison of three prompting systems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 411–432.
36.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.RichterS. M.WhiteJ.MazzottiV.WalkerA. R.… KorteringL. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary-transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi:10.1177/0885728809336859
37.
*WhatleyA. D.GastD. L.HammondD. L. (2009). Visual activity schedules: Teaching independent transitioning during recreation and leisure. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 43, 27–42.
38.
WoleryM.GastD. L. (1984). Effective and efficient procedures for the transfer of stimulus control. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 52–77.
