A systematic literature review was conducted to examine the evidence for peer network interventions for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Fifteen studies were identified and evaluated for methodological rigor using the quality indicators published by the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) and by examining the risk of bias. Relying only on the guidelines from the CEC, peer network interventions are an evidence-based practice for increasing the communication and interaction of students with IDD with their peers without disabilities. However, risk of bias assessment revealed several methodological issues, outcome measurement was generally restricted to being context-bound rather than generalized, and there is a need for further research at the middle school level, with students with intellectual disability who do not have an autism diagnosis, and with students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Implications are provided about training and supporting school personnel to implement peer network interventions.
AndzikN.ChungY.KranakM. (2016). Communication opportunities for elementary school students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1241299
2.
*AsmusJ.CarterE.MossC.BiggsE.BoltD.BornT.Bottema-BeutelK.BrockM.CatteyG.CooneyM.FespermanE.HochmanJ.HuberH.LequiaJ.LyonsG.VincentL.WeirK. (2017). Efficacy and social validity of peer wetwork interventions for high school students with severe disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-122.2.118
3.
*BambaraL.ColeC.ChovanesJ.TelesfordA.ThomasA.TsaiS.AyadE.BilgiliI. (2018). Improving the assertive conversational skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in a natural context. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 48, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.01.002
4.
*BambaraL.ColeC.KunschC.TsaiS.AyadE. (2016). A peer-mediated intervention to improve the conversational skills of high school students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.03.003
5.
BiggsE. E.CarterE. W. (2017). Supporting the social lives of students with intellectual disability. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 235–254). Routledge.
6.
*BiggsE. E.CarterE.BumbleJ.BarnesK.MazurE. (2018). Enhancing peer network interventions for students with complex communication needs. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918792899
7.
BiggsE. E.GilsonC. B.CarterE. W. (2016). Accomplishing more together: Influences to the quality of professional relationships between special educators and paraprofessionals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1540796916665604
8.
BiggsE. E.SnodgrassM. (2020). Children’s perspectives on their relationships with friends with and without complex communication needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919901271
9.
BrockM.HuberH. (2017). Are peer support arrangements an evidence-based practice? A systematic review. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917708184
10.
CarterE. W.AsmusJ.MossC. K.CooneyM.WeirK.VincentL.BornT.HochmanJ. M.Bottema-BeutelK.FespermanE. (2013). Peer network strategies to foster social connections among adolescents with and without severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F004005991304600206
11.
CarterE. W.SiscoL.BrownL.BrickhamD.Al-KhabbazZ. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 113(6), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1352/2008.113:479-494
12.
ChungY.CarterE.SiscoL. (2012). Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117(5), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.349
13.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Standards for evidence-based practices in special education.
14.
FeldmanR. S. (2010). Child development (5th ed.). Pearson.
15.
*GardnerK.CarterE.GustafsonJ.HochmanJ.HarveyM.MullinsT.FanH. (2014). Effects of peer networks on the social interactions of high school students with autism spectrum disorders. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39(2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914544550
16.
*Garrison-HarrellL.KampsD.KravitsT. (1997). The effects of peer networks on social-communicative behaviors for students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769701200406
17.
HammJ.FairclothB. (2005). The role of friendship in adolescents’ sense of school belonging. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005(107), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.121
18.
*HerbertM.BrockM.BarczakM.AndersonE. (2020). Efficacy of peer-network interventions for high school students with severe disabilities and complex communication needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920904179
HigginsJ. P. T.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. A. (Eds.). (2021). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.2. Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
21.
*HochmanJ.CarterE.Bottema-BeutelK.HarveyM.GustafsonJ. (2015). Efficacy of peer networks to increase social connections among high school students with and without autism spectrum disorder. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585482
22.
*KampsD.KampsD.Thiemann-BourqueK.Thiemann-BourqueK.Heitzman-PowellL.Heitzman-PowellL.SchwartzI.SchwartzI.RosenbergN.RosenbergN.MasonR.MasonR.CoxS.CoxS. (2015). A comprehensive peer network intervention to improve social communication of children with autism spectrum disorders: A randomized trial in kindergarten and first grade. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1809–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2340-2
23.
*KampsD.MasonR.Thiemann-BourqueK.FeldmillerS.TurcotteA.MillerT. (2014). The use of peer networks to increase communicative acts of students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29(4), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614539832
24.
*KampsD.PotucekJ.LopezA.KravitsT.KemmererK. (1997). The use of peer networks across multiple settings to improve social interaction for students with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022879607019
25.
*KasariC.DeanM.KretzmannM.ShihW.OrlichF.WhitneyR.LandaR.LordC.KingB. (2016). Children with autism spectrum disorder and social skills groups at school: A randomized trial comparing intervention approach and peer composition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12460
26.
LedfordJ.GastD. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666
27.
LockeJ.IshijimaE.KasariC.LondonN. (2010). Loneliness, friendship quality and the social networks of adolescents with high-functioning autism in an inclusive school setting. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01148.x
28.
LockeJ.Kang-YiC.PellecchiaM.MandellD. S. (2019). It’s messy but real: A pilot study of the implementation of a social engagement intervention for children with autism in schools. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 19(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12436
29.
LockeJ.Rotheram-FullerE.KasariC. (2012). Exploring the social impact of being a typical peer model for included children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1895–1905.
30.
LockeJ.ShihW.KretzmannM.KasariC. (2016). Examining playground engagement between elementary school children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(6), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315599468
31.
*MasonR.KampsD.TurcotteA.CoxS.FeldmillerS.MillerT. (2014). Peer mediation to increase communication and interaction at recess for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(3), 334–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.014
32.
MassafraA.GershwinT.GosselinK. (2020). Policy, preparation, and practice. . . oh my! Current policy regarding the paraprofessional role and preparation for working with students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 31(3), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1044207320920004
33.
McGuinnessL. A.HigginsJ. P. T. (2021). Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): A R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411
34.
ReichowB.BartonE. E.MagginD. M. (2018). Development and applications of the single-case design risk of bias tool for evaluating single-case design research study reports. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.05.008
35.
ReichowB.VolkmarF. (2010). Social skills interventions for individuals with autism: Evaluation for evidence-based practices within a best evidence synthesis framework. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0842-0
36.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.BowkerJ. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In BornsteinM. H.LeventhalT.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Ecological settings and processes (pp. 175–222). Wiley.
37.
SandbankM.Bottema-BeutelK.CrowleyS.CassidyM.DunhamK.FeldmanJ. I.CrankJ.AlbarranS. A.RajS.MahbubP.WoynaroskiT. G. (2020). Project AIM: Autism intervention meta-analysis for studies of young children. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000215
38.
SchalockR. L.LuckassonR.TasséM. J. (2019). The contemporary view of intellectual and developmental disabilities: Implications for psychologists. Psicothema, 31(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.119
39.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.SchalockR. L.ThompsonJ. R. (2017). Reframing educational supports for students with intellectual disability through strengths-based approaches. In WehmeyerM. L.ShogrenK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 17–130). Routledge.
40.
ShonkoffJ.PhillipsD. (2000). Making friends and getting along with peers. In ShonkoffJ.PhillipsD. (Eds.), From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development (pp. 164–182). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9824
41.
*SreckovicM.HumeK.AbleH. (2017). Examining the efficacy of peer network interventions on the social interactions of high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(8), 2556–2574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3171-8
42.
SterneJ. A. C.SavovicJ.PageM. J.ElbersR. G.BlencoweN. S.BoutronI.CatesC. J.ChengH. Y.CorbettM. S.EldridgeS. M.EmbersonJ. R.HernánM. A.HopewellS.HróbjartssonA.JunqueiraD. R.JüniP.KirkhamJ. J.LassersonT.LiT.HigginsJ. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. British Medical Journal, 366, Article 14898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
43.
*ThomasA.BambaraL. (2020). Using peer-mediation to enhance conversation and reduce inappropriate communication acts in adolescents with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(2), 185–200.
44.
TraversH. E.CarterE. W. (2021). A systematic review of how peer-mediated interventions impacts students without disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521989414
45.
WatkinsL.O’ReillyM.KuhnM.GevarterC.LancioniG.SigafoosJ.LangR. (2015). A review of peer-mediated social interaction interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2264-x
46.
WentzelK. R.BarryC. M.CaldwellK. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195
47.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2020). What works clearinghouse standards handbook, version 4.1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks
48.
YoderP.LloydB.SymonsF. (2018). Observational measurement of behavior (2nd ed.). Brookes.
49.
YoderP. J.Bottema-BeutelK.WoynaroskiT.ChandrasekharR.SandbankM. (2013). Social communication intervention effects vary by dependent variable type in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 7, 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.917780
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
