Childhood Placement in Special Education and Adult Well-Being

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between childhood placement in special education and adult well-being among 1,377 low-income, minority children participating in the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Roughly 16% of the sample received special education services in Grades 1 to 8. After accounting for sociodemographic factors and early academic achievement, children receiving special education services tended to have lower rates of high school completion and fewer years of education, as well as greater rates of incarceration, substance misuse, and depression. Eighth-grade academic achievement significantly mediated the association between childhood placement in special education and adult well-being outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by providing support for a pathway from childhood special education placement to adult outcomes among an inner-city minority cohort.

Keywords

special education well-being academic achievement longitudinal

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Blackorby

Wagner

(1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.

Boardman

A. G.

Arguelles

M. E.

Vaughn

Hughes

M. T.

Klingner

(2005). Special education teaches’ views of research-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 168–180.

Bronfenbrenner

(1992). Ecological systems theory. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.

Brownell

M. T.

Bishop

A. G.

Gersten

Klingner

J. K.

Penfield

R. D.

Dimino

Sindelar

P. T.

(2009). The role of domain expertise in beginning special education teacher quality. Exceptional Children, 75, 391–411.

Campbell

F. A.

Ramey

C. T.

(1995). Cognitive and school outcomes for high-risk African-American students at middle adolescence: Positive effects of early intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 743–772.

Campbell

F. A.

Ramey

C. T.

Pungello

Sparling

Miller-Johnson

(2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 42–57.

Chen

Symons

Reynolds

A. J.

(2011). Prospective analyses of childhood factors and anti-social behavior for students with high-incidence disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 37(1), 5–18.

Chen

Z. Y.

Kaplan

H. B.

(2003). School failure in early adolescence and status attainment in middle adulthood: A longitudinal study. Sociology of Education, 76, 110–127.

10.

Chicago Longitudinal Study. (2005). A study of children in the Chicago public schools: User’s guide (Version 7). Madison: University of Wisconsin.

11.

Colman

Murray

Abbott

R. A.

Maughan

Kuh

Croudace

T. J.

Jones

P. B.

(2009). Outcomes of conduct problems in adolescence: 40 year follow-up of national cohort. British Medical Journal, 338, 1–8.

12.

Conyers

L. M.

Reynolds

A. J.

S. R.

(2003). The effect of early childhood intervention and subsequent special education services: Findings from the Chicago child-parent centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 75–95.

13.

Derogatis

L. R.

Melisaratos

(1983). The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.

14.

Dorman

J. P.

(2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4, 243–257.

15.

Fulk

B. M.

Brigham

F. J.

Lohman

D. A.

(1998). Motivation and self-regulation: A comparison of students with learning and behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 300–309.

16.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2002). Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities? Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 584–599.

17.

Hieronymus

A. N.

Hoover

H. D.

(1990). Iowa tests of basic skills: Manual for school administrators (Suppl.). Chicago, IL: Riverside.

18.

Hocutt

A. M.

(1996). Effectiveness of special education: Is placement the critical factor? The Future of Children, 6, 77–102.

19.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

20.

Kepper

Monshouwer

Van Dorsselaer

Vollebergh

(2011). Substance use by adolescents in special education and residential youth care institutions. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 311–319.

21.

Lackaye

Margalit

Ziv

Ziman

(2006). Comparisons of self-efficacy, mood, effort, and hope between students with learning disabilities and their non-LD-matched peers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 111–121.

22.

Landrum

T. J.

Tankersley

Kauffman

J. M.

(2003). What is special about special education for students with emotional or behavioral disorders? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 148–156.

23.

Lauchlan

Boyle

(2007). Is the use of labels in special education helpful? Support for Learning, 22(1), 36–42.

24.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Scruggs

T. E.

Graetz

Norland

Gardizi

Mcduffie

(2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260–270.

25.

McLeskey

Billingsley

B. S.

(2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap? A perspective on the teacher shortage in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 293–305.

26.

McNamara

J. K.

Willoughby

(2010). A longitudinal study of risk-taking behavior in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 11–24.

27.

McNamara

J. K.

Willoughby

Chalmers

YLC-CURA. (2005). Psychosocial status of adolescents with learning disabilities with and without comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 234–244.

28.

Montague

Enders

Cavendish

Castro

(2011). Academic and behavioral trajectories for at-risk adolescents in urban schools. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 141–156.

29.

Morgan

P. L.

Frisco

M. L.

Farkas

Hibel

(2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 236–254.

30.

Morgan

P. L.

Sideridis

G. D.

(2006). Contrasting the effectiveness of fluency interventions for students with or at risk of learning disabilities: A multilevel random coefficient modeling meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 21, 191–210.

31.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

32.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: A first look: 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

33.

Newman

Wagner

Cameto

Knokey

A. M.

Shaver

(2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

34.

Reynolds

A. J.

(2006). Early childhood intervention and educational attainment: Age 22 findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11, 175–198.

35.

Reynolds

A. J.

(2008). Predictors of educational attainment in the Chicago Longitudinal Study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 199–229.

36.

Pereda

Forns

Peró

(2007). Dimensional structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory with Spanish college students. Psicothema, 19, 634–639.

37.

Phelps

Hanley-Maxwell

(1997). School to work transitions for youth with disabilities: A review of outcomes and practices. Review of Educational Research, 67, 197–226.

38.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.

39.

Prelow

H. M.

Weaver

S. R.

Swenson

R. R.

Bowman

M. A.

(2005). A preliminary investigation of the validity and reliability of the Brief-Symptom Inventory-18 in economically disadvantaged Latina American mothers. Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 139–155.

40.

Quinn

M. M.

Rutherford

R. B.

Leone

P. E.

Osher

D. M.

Poirier

J. M.

(2005). Students with disabilities in detention and correctional settings. Exceptional Children, 71, 339–345.

41.

Rea

P. J.

McLaughlin

V. L.

Walther-Thomas

(2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68, 203–222.

42.

Reynolds

A. J.

(2012). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 2000)

43.

Reynolds

A. J.

Temple

J. A.

Arteaga

I. A.

White

B. A.

(2011). School-based early childhood education and age-28 well-being: Effects by timing, dosage, and subgroups. Science, 333, 360–364.

44.

Reynolds

A. J.

Wolfe

(1999). Special education and school achievement: An exploratory analysis with a central-city sample. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 249–269.

45.

Salend

Duhaney

(2007). Inclusion: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In McLeskey

(Ed.), Reflections on inclusion: Classic articles that shaped our thinking (pp. 125–159). Arlington, VA: Council of Exceptional Children.

46.

Salvia

Ysseldyke

J. E.

(1998). Assessment (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

47.

Sanders

Rivers

(1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: Value-Added Research and Assessment Center, University of Tennessee.

48.

Sanford

Newman

Wagner

Cameto

Knokey

A. M.

Shaver

(2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 6 years after high school: Key findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

49.

Schafer

J. L.

Graham

J. W.

(2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

50.

Schweinhart

L. J.

Weikart

D. P.

(1997). The high/scope preschool curriculum comparison study through age 23. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 117–143.

51.

Stetser

M. C.

Stillwell

(2014). Public high school four-year on-time graduation rates and event dropout rates: School years 2010-11 and 2011-12. First Look (NCES 2014-391). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

52.

Swanson

H. L.

(2001). Research on interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher-order processing. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 331–348.

53.

Szumilas

(2010). Explaining odds ratios. Journal Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 19, 227–229.

54.

Valas

(2001). Learned helplessness and psychological adjustment II: Effects of learning disabilities and low achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 101–114.

55.

Vaughn

Linan-Thompson

(2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37, 140–147.

56.

Vellutino

F. R.

Scanlon

D. M.

Small

Fanuele

D. P.

(2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169.

57.

Wagner

Newman

Cameto

Levine

(2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2006-3000). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

58.

Zhao

Lynch

J. G.

Chen

(2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.