Teaching students to develop and use a Summary of Performance (SOP) may be one method for teaching self-advocacy skills to ensure students with intellectual disability can advocate for accommodations and supports during Person-Centered Planning (PCP) meetings and in postschool employment settings. This study used a multiple-probe across participants design to investigate the effects of the Self-Directed Summary of Performance (SD-SOP) on participation in PCP meetings for students with intellectual disability. Results indicated increased participation during PCP meetings for all participants. In addition, participants were able to generalize use of the SD-SOP to employment settings. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
ArndtS. A.KonradM.TestD. W. (2006). Effects of the self-directed IEP on student participation in planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 194–207. doi:10.1177/07419325060270040101
2.
BaerR. M.DavisoA. W.FlexerR. W.QueenR. M.MeindlR. S. (2011). Students with intellectual disabilities: Predictors of transition outcomes. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 132–141.doi:10.1177/0885728811399090
3.
ClaesC.Van HoveG.VandeveldeS.van LoonJ.SchalockR. L. (2010). Person-centered planning: Analysis of research and effectiveness. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 432–453.doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.6.432
4.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
5.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
6.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
GrigalM.HartD.MiglioreA. (2011). Comparing the transition planning, postsecondary education, and employment outcomes of students with intellectual and other disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 4–17. doi:10.1177/0885728811399091
8.
GrigalM.HartD.WeirC. (2011). Think college standards quality indicators, and benchmarks for inclusive higher education. Boston: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.
9.
HagnerD.KurtzA.CloutierH.ArakelianC.BruckerD. L.MayJ. (2012). Outcomes of family-centered transition process for students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 42–50.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
KatsiyannisA.ZhangD.WoodruffN.DixonA. (2005). Transition supports to students with mental retardation: An examination of data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 109–116.
14.
KelleyK. R.BartholomewA.TestD. W. (2011). Effects of the self-directed IEP delivered using computer-assisted instruction on student participation in educational planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932511415864
15.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf
17.
LueckingR. (2009). The way to work: How to facilitate work experiences for youth in transition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
MartinJ.Van DyckeJ.D’OttavioM.NickersonK. (2007). The student-directed summary of performance: Increasing student and family involvement in the transition planning process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 13–26.
19.
MichaelsC. A.FerraraD. L. (2005). Promoting post-school success for all: The role of collaboration in person-centered transition planning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16, 287–313.
20.
MinerC. A.BatesP. E. (1997). The effect of person centered planning activities on the IEP/transition planning process. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 105–112.
21.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.SchwartingM. (2011). The Post-High School Outcomes of Young Adults with Disabilities up to 8 Years After High School: A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/
22.
RichterS. M.MazzottiV. L. (2011). A review of the literature on summary of performance. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 176–186. doi:10.1177/0885728811399089
23.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33.
24.
ShawS. F.KeenanW. R.MadausJ. W.BanerjeeM. (2010). Disability documentation, the Americans with disabilities amendment act, and the summary of performance: How are they linked?Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22, 142–150.
25.
WehmeyerM. L.SchalockR. L. (2001). Self-determination and quality of life: Implications for special education services and supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(8), 1–16.
26.
Whitney-ThomasJ.ShawD.HoneyK.ButterworthJ. (1998). Building a future: A study of student participation in Person-Centered Planning. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 119–133.
