The purpose of this case study was to determine teachers’ rationales for assigning students with mild disabilities to alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS). In interviews, special educators stated that their primary considerations in making the assignments were low academic performance, student use of extended standard modifications, and the inflexible 1% cap. None of the teachers provided their students with grade-level content or appropriate modifications. Some students were competent in grade-level reading, but were assigned to the 2010 AA-AAS because read-aloud accommodation is not permitted in the reading passages of the general assessment. Findings raised concerns about the susceptibility of eligibility guidelines to lead to subjective decisions. Future research, implications of these findings, and limitations of the study are discussed.
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic andstatistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
CascellaP. W. (1999). Communication disorders and children with mental retardation. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 8, 61–75.
5.
ChoH.-J.KingstonN. (2011a). Capturing implicit policy from NCLB test type assignments: Analysis of characteristics and performance of students taking alternate assessments based on modified achievement standards. Exceptional Children, 78, 58–72.
6.
ChoH.-J.KingstonN. (2011b). Examining IEP team decisions on test-type assignments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
CreswellJ. W.HansonW. E.Clark PlanoV. L.MoralesA. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 236–264.
8.
DeStefanoL.ShrinerJ. G.LloydC. A. (2001). Teacher decision making in participation of students with disabilities in large-scale assessment. Exceptional Children, 68, 7–22.
9.
DominickK.Ornstein DavisN.LainhartJ.Tager-FlusbergH.FolsteinS. (2007). Atypical behaviors in children with autism and children with a history of language impairment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 145–162.
10.
FerrellR. B.WolinskyE. J.KauffmanC. I.FlashmanL. A.McAllisterT. W. (2004). Neuropsychiatric syndromes in adults with intellectual disability: Issues in assessment and treatment. Current Psychiatry Reports, 6, 380–390.
11.
FilbinJ. (2008). Lessons from the initial peer review of alternate assessments based on modified achievement standards. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) Student Achievement and School Accountability Program.
12.
FullerC. G.SabatinoD. A. (1998). Diagnosis and treatment considerations with comorbid developmentally disabled populations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 1–10.
13.
HelwigR.TindalG. (2003). An experimental analysis of accommodation decisions on large-scale mathematics tests. Exceptional Children, 69, 211–225.
14.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.StrainP. S.ToddA. W.ReedH. K.(2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 423–446.
15.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, PL 105-17, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
16.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
17.
JansenD. E. M. C.KrolB.GroothoffJ. W.PostD. (2004). People with intellectual disability and their health problems: A review of comparative studies. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 93–102.
18.
KearnsJ. F.Towles-ReevesE.KleinertH. L.O’Regan KleinertJ.Kleine-Kracht ThomasM. (2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 45, 3–14.
19.
Ketterlin-GellerL. R.AlonzoJ.Braun-MoneganJ.TindalG.(2007). Recommendations for accommodations: Implications of (in)consistency. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 194–206.
20.
Ketterlin-GellerL. R.YovanoffP.TindalG. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73, 331–347.
21.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
McBrienJ. A. (2003). Assessment and diagnosis of depression in people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 1–13.
23.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
25.
MussonJ. E.ThomasM. K.Towles-ReevesE.KearnsJ. F. (2010). An analysis of state alternate assessment participation guidelines. Journal of Special Education, 44, 67–78.
26.
National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.
28.
QuenemoenR. (2009). Identifying students and considering why and whether to assess them with an alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards. In PerieM. (Ed.), Considerations for the alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards (AA-MAS): Understanding the eligible population and applying that knowledge to their instruction and assessment [White paper] (pp. 25-26).
29.
SeagerM. C.O’BrienG. (2003). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Review of ADHD in learning disability: The diagnostic criteria for psychiatric disorders for use with adults with learning disabilities/mental retardation [DC-LD] criteria for diagnosis. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 26–31.
30.
ShattuckP. T.Mailick SeltzerM.GreenbergJ. S.OrsmondG. I.BoltD.KringS.. . .LordC. (2007). Change in autism symptoms and maladaptive behaviors in adolescents and adults with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1735–1747.
31.
SlavinR. E. (1984). Research methods in education: A practical guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
32.
SteffenburgU.HagbergG.KyllermanM. (1995). Active epilepsy in mentally retarded children: II. Etiology and reduced pre- and perinatal optimality. Acta Paediatrica, 84, 1153–1159.
33.
SteffenburgU.HagbergG.ViggedalG.KyllermanM. (1995). Active epilepsy in mentally retarded children: I. Prevalence and additional neuroimpairments. Acta Paediatrica, 84, 1147–1152.
34.
SternbergL.TaylorR. L.BabkieA. (1994). Correlates of interventions with self-injurious behavior. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 38, 475–485.
ThurlowM. L. (2007). The challenge of special populations to accountability for all. In ClarkD. (Ed.), No child left behind: A five year review (Congressional Program, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 39–44). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
37.
ThurlowM. L. (2008). Assessment and instructional implications of the alternate assessment based on modified academic achievement standards (AA-MAS). Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19, 132–139.
38.
Towles-ReevesE.KearnsJ.KleinertH.KleinertJ. (2009). An analysis of the learning characteristics of students taking alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 42, 241–254.
39.
TsatsanisK. D.RourkeB. P.KlinA.VolkmarF. R.CicchettiD.SchultzR. T. (2003). Reduced thalamic volume in high-functioning individuals with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 121–129.
40.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Alternate achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities (non-regulatory guidance). Washington, DC: Author.
41.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Additional Title 1 provisions included in the regulations package on modified academic achievement standards. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/modachieve-summary.html
42.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
