Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine all states’ participation guidelines for alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) and to analyze these guidelines for common and contrasting themes. State alternate assessment participation guidelines were found for all 50 states. Participation guidelines were coded, and 12 categories emerged. These categories fell into four major patterns: not included in almost all states’ participation guidelines, evenly distributed between being included and not included, included in the majority of states’ participation guidelines, and included in almost all states’ participation guidelines. This research can help state-level personnel revise and improve their own participation guidelines by providing information about current language used in participation guidelines and can inform the field of the level of consistency in the language used to describe the population who participate in AA-AAS.

Keywords

alternate assessment participation guidelines student population eligibility criteria

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almond, P. , & Bechard, S. ( 2005). In-depth look at students who take alternate assessments: What do we know now? Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.4.measuredprogress.org/Resources/Research/Grants/CO/download/StudentsTakingAltAssess.pdf

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-382, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

Ly, T. ( 2004). Compilation of state alternate assessment participation guidelines. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.rrfcnetwork.org/images/stories/MSRRC/DOCS/ASSESSMENT/alt%20assess%20participation%20guidelines%202.04.pdf

Marion, S.F. , & Pellegrino, J.W. (2006). A validity framework for evaluating the technical quality of alternate assessments. Educational Measurement: Issue and Practice, 25, 47-57.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.

10.

Pellegrino, J. W. , Chudowsky, N. J. , & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

11.

Thompson, S.J. , Erickson, R. , Thurlow, M.L. , Ysseldyke, J.E. , & Callender, S. ( 1999). Status of the states in the development of alternate assessments (Synthesis Report No. 31). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis31.html

12.

Thompson, S.J. , & Thurlow, M.L. ( 2000). State alternate assessments: Status as IDEA alternate assessment requirements take effect (Synthesis Report No. 35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis35.html

13.

Thompson, S.J. , Thurlow, M.L. , Johnstone, C.J. , & Altman, J.R. ( 2005). 2005 State special education outcomes: Steps forward in a decade of change. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved November 29, 2007, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2005StateReport.htm

14.

Thurlow, M.L. ( 2004). How state policies and practices for alternate assessment impact who is included in NAEP state assessments. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.nagb.org/pubs/conferences/thurlow.pdf

15.

Towles-Reeves, E. , Kearns, J. , Kleinert, H. , & Kleinert, J. ( 2008, May 12). An analysis of the learning characteristics of students taking alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards . Journal of Special Education. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://sed.sagepub.com/cgi/rapidpdf/0022466907313451v1

16.

U.S. Department of Education. (2005). No Child Left Behind: Alternate achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities: Non-regulatory guidance. Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/altguidance.pdf

17.

Warlick, K. , & Olsen, K. ( 1999, February). Who takes the alternate assessment? State criteria . Lexington: University of Kentucky, Mid-South Regional Resource Center.

18.

Yin, R.K. ( 2002). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

19.

Ysseldyke, J. , & Olsen, K. ( 1999). Putting alternate assessments into practice: What to measure and possible sources of data. Exceptional Children , 65, 175-185.

An Analysis of State Alternate Assessment Participation Guidelines

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References