The least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate provides a preference for educating students with disabilities in general education classrooms while allowing separate class services as necessary to meet student needs. This study investigated changes in national LRE placement trends for students with disabilities from 1990-1991 through 2007-2008. Findings revealed a significant increase in placements in general education settings and a substantial decrease in more restrictive placements. Placement practices for students at the secondary level changed substantially more than placements for elementary students, although both groups moved toward significantly less restrictive placement practices. Students with learning disabilities accounted for much of the overall change in placement practices, whereas students with emotional or behavioral disorders and intellectual disabilities experienced smaller changes in less restrictive placements.
BulgrenJ.MarquisJ.DeshlerD.SchumakerJ. B.LenzB. K.DavisB.GrossenB. (2006). The instructional context of inclusive secondary general education classes: Teachers’ instructional roles and practices, curricular demands, and research-based practices and standards. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 39–65.
2.
CrockettJ. (1999). The least restrictive environment and the 1997 IDEA amendments and federal regulations. Journal of Law and Education, 28, 543–564.
DanielsonL.BellamyT. (1989). State variation in placement of children with handicaps in segregated environments. Exceptional Children, 55, 448–455.
5.
DenoE. (1970). Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37, 229–237.
6.
DuhaneyL. (1999). A content analysis of state education agencies’ policies/position statements on inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 367–378.
7.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
8.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act, Pub. L. No. 94–142 (1975).
9.
FarrellP.DysonA.PolatF.HutchesonG.GallannaughF. (2007). Inclusion and achievement in mainstream schools. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, 131–145.
10.
FreemanS. F. N.AlkinM. C. (2000). Academic and social attainments of children with mental retardation in general and special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 2–18.
11.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
12.
FurneyK.HasaziS.Clark/KeefeK.HartnettJ. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of shifting policy landscapes in special and general education reform. Exceptional Children, 70, 81–94.
13.
GoldsteinH.MossJ.JordanL. (1965). The efficacy of special class training on the development of mentally retarded children (U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Research Program Project No. 619). Urbana: University of Illinois Institute for Research on Exceptional Children. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED002907)
14.
HardmanM. L.DawsonS. (2008). The impact of federal public policy on curriculum and instruction for students with disabilities in the general classroom. Preventing School Failure, 52, 5–11.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004). Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/
17.
JohnsonG. O. (1962). Special education for the mentally handicapped: A paradox. Exceptional Children, 29, 62–69.
18.
KauffmanJ. (1993). How might we achieve the radical reform of special education?Exceptional Children, 60, 6–16.
19.
KauffmanJ. (2007). Conceptual models and the future of special education. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 241–258.
20.
KauffmanJ.BantzJ.McCulloughJ. (2002). Separate and better: A special public school class for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 10, 149–170.
21.
KauffmanJ.MockD.SimpsonR. (2007). Problems related to underservice of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality, 17, 177–188.
22.
KavaleK.FornessS. (2000). History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279–296.
23.
KavaleK.MosertM. (2003). River of ideology, islands of evidence. Exceptionality, 11, 191–208.
24.
KorinekL.McLaughlinV.Walther-ThomasC. S. (1995). Least restrictive environment and collaboration: Bridge over troubled water. Preventing School Failure, 39, 6–12.
25.
LandrumT.TankersleyM.KauffmanJ. (2003). What’s special about special education for students with emotional and behavioral disorders?The Journal of Special Education, 37, 148–156.
26.
LeeS. S. (2004). Implementation of the Office of Special Education Programs’ focused monitoring during calendar year 2003 (Memorandum to chief state school officers and lead agency directors). Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dlsea/een/doc/osepmemo.doc
27.
LipskyD.GartnerA. (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America’s classrooms. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
28.
McLeskeyJ. (Ed.). (2007). Reflections on inclusion: Classic articles that shaped our thinking. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
29.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB. (2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap? A perspective on the teacher shortage in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 293–305.
30.
McLeskeyJ.HenryD.AxelrodM. (1999). Inclusion of students with LD: An examination of data from Reports to Congress. Exceptional Children, 65, 55–66.
31.
McLeskeyJ.HenryD.HodgesD. (1998). Inclusion: Where is it happening?Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(1), 4–11.
32.
McLeskeyJ.HenryD.HodgesD. (1999). Inclusion: What progress is being made across disability categories?Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(3), 60–64.
33.
McLeskeyJ.HoppeyD.WilliamsonP.RentzT. F. (2004). Is inclusion an illusion? An examination of national and state trends toward the education of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 19, 109–115.
34.
McLeskeyJ.LandersE.HoppeyD.WilliamsonP. (2010). Learning disabilities and the LRE mandate: An analysis of national and state trends. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida, Gainesville.
35.
McLeskeyJ.PacchianoD. (1994). Mainstreaming students with learning disabilities: Are we making progress?Exceptional Children, 60, 508–517.
36.
McLeskeyJ.RosenbergM.WestlingD. (2010). Inclusion: Effective practices for all students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education (Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, DonovanM. S.CrossC. T., Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OsborneA. G.DimattiaP. (1994). The IDEA’s least restrictive environment mandate: Legal implications. Exceptional Children, 61, 6–14.
40.
ReynoldsM. C.BirchJ. W. (1977). The interface between regular and special education. Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 1(1), 12–27.
41.
ReynoldsM. C.WangM.WalbergH. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
42.
SawyerR. J.McLaughlinM. J.WingleeM. (1994). Is integration of students with disabilities happening? An analysis of national data trends over time. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 204–215.
43.
SchumakerJ.DeshlerD. (1987). Implementing the Regular Education Initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.
44.
SimpsonR. (2004). Inclusion of students with behavior disorders in general education settings: Research and measurement issues. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 19–31.
45.
SmithP. (2007). Have we made any progress? Including students with intellectual disabilities in regular education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 297–309.
46.
SoukupJ. H.WehmeyerM. L.BashinskiS. M.BovairdJ. A. (2007). Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 101–120.
47.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (Eds.). (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
48.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009a). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) data: Data Accountability Center. Retrieved from http://www.ideadata.org/
49.
U.S. Department of Education. (2009b). Twenty-eighth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Washington, DC: Author.
50.
WaldronN.McLeskeyJ. (2009). Developing schools that are both effective and inclusive. Alicante, Spain: Paper presented at the International Association of Special Education Conference.
51.
WillM. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–416.
52.
WilliamsonP.McLeskeyJ.HoppeyD.RentzT. (2006). Educating students with mental retardation in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 72, 347–361.
53.
ZigmondN.KlooA.VoloninoV. (2009). What, where, how? Special education in the climate of full inclusion. Exceptionality, 17, 189–204.
