The No Child Left Behind Act (2001) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004) emphasize accountability to improve student academic achievement. Promoting self-determination has been proposed as a means to achieving this outcome. Elementary teachers in 30 states were surveyed to measure (a) their perceived importance of self-determination, (b) to what extent they teach it, and (c) the barriers that inhibit them from teaching it. Both general and special educators assigned considerable importance to self-determination instruction and reported at least occasionally providing such instruction. The authors found a lack of congruence between the value teachers place on promoting self-determination and the time they devote to teaching it. Limitations and implications are discussed, and suggestions for future research are offered.
AgranM.CavinM.WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2006). Participation of students with moderate to severe disabilities in the general curriculum: The effects of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 230–241.
2.
AgranM.SnowK.SwanerJ. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 293–301.
3.
AgranM.WehmeyerM. L.CavinM.PalmerS. B. (2008). Promoting active student classroom participation skills through instruction to promote self-regulated learning and self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 106–118.
4.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM.GlaeserB. (2006). Self-determination skills of transition-age youth with emotional disturbances and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 333–346.
5.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. R.StangK. K. (2008). Promoting self-determination for transition-age youth: Views of high school general and special educators. Exceptional Children, 31, 174–185.
6.
ChoH. J.PalmerB. S. (2008). Fostering self-determination in infants and toddlers with visual impairments or blindness, Young Exceptional Children, 69, 439–453.
7.
DannekerJ. E.BottgeB. A. (2008). Benefits of and barriers to elementary students-led individualized education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–127.
8.
DollB.SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (1996). Promoting the development and acquisition of self-determined behavior. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self- determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 65–90). Baltimore: Brookes.
9.
EisenmanL. T. (2007). Self-determination interventions: Building a foundation for school completion. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 2–8.
10.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self- determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 40, 234–242.
11.
GregoK.MastropieriM.ScruggsT. E. (2008). Improving problem solving of elementary school students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–127.
12.
GrigalM.NeubertD. A.MoonM. S.GrahamS. (2003). Self-determination for students with disabilities: Views of parents and teachers. Exceptional Children, 70, 97–112.
LachapelleY.WehmeyerM. L.HaelewyckM. C.CourboisY.KeithK. D.SchalockR. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744.
15.
LeeS. H.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D. (2008). Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. Journal of Special Education, 42, 91–107.
16.
MartinJ. E.MithaugD. E.CoxP.PetersonL. Y.Van DyekeL.CashM. E. (2003). Increasing self-determination: Teaching students to plan, work, evaluate, and adjust. Council for Exceptional Children, 69, 431–447.
17.
MasonC.FieldS.SawilowskyS. (2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70, 441–451.
18.
NealeM.TestD. W. (2009). Effects of the “I can use effort” strategy on quality of student verbal contributions and individualized program participants with the third and fourth grade students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–127.
19.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L. (2003). Promoting self-determination in early elementary school. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 115–127.
20.
PalmerS. B.WehmeyerM. L.GipsonK.AgranM. (2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children, 70, 427–439.
21.
RobbinsS. B.AllenJ.CasillasA.PetersonC. H.LeH. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 598–616.
22.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.GarnerN.LittleT. D. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–509.
23.
StangK. K.CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM. P. (2008). Perspectives of general and special educators on fostering self-determination in elementary and middle schools. Journal of Special Education, 43, 94–106.
24.
ThomaC. A.NathansonR.BakerS. R.TamuraR. (2002). Self-determination: What do special educators know and where do they learn it?Remedial and Special Education, 23, 242–247.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2006). The academic achievement and functional performance of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2006_07/nlts2_report_2006_07.pdf
27.
WardM. J. (2006). Self-determination and special: Lessons learned and challenges to address. TASH Connections, 32(5–6). Retrieved from http://www.tash.org/express/06mayjun/ward.htm.
28.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
29.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS. (2007). Instructional and assessment strategies to promote the self-determination of students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
30.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS.DorenB.JonesB.MasonC. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in the standard-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70, 413–425.
31.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
32.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.AgranM.MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The self- determination learning model of instruction. Exceptional Children, 69, 439–453.
33.
WehmeyerM.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–256.
