The Effect of Student-Directed Transition Planning With a Computer-Based Reading Support Program on the Self-Determination of Students With Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2011
The Effect of Student-Directed Transition Planning With a Computer-Based Reading Support Program on the Self-Determination of Students With Disabilities
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of student-directed transition planning instruction (Whose Future Is It Anyway? curriculum) with a computer-based reading support program (Rocket Reader) on the self-determination, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, and transition planning knowledge of students with disabilities. This study employed a pre- and postmeasure design with 168 middle school students with disabilities who were assigned to an experimental group (n = 86) and control group (n = 82). The results of the study demonstrated that self-determination, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancy for education planning improved through the application of Rocket Reader . Avenues are discussed for promoting middle school students’ self-determination in their transition planning, as are implications for future research.
Acock, A.C. ( 2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1012-1028.
2.
Agran, M., Blanchard, C., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The self-determined model of instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developing Disabilities, 35, 351-364.
3.
Agran, M., Snow, K., & Swaner, J. ( 1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, and strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 293-301.
4.
Alcalde, C., Navarro, J.I., Marchena, E., & Ruiz, G. ( 1998). Acquisition of basic concepts by children with intellectual disabilities using a computer assisted learning approach. Psychological Reports, 82, 1051-1056.
5.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Bernard-Opitz, V., Sriram, N., & Nakhoda-Sapuan, S. (2001). Enhancing social problem solving in children with autism and normal children through computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders , 31, 377-384.
7.
Blischak, D.M., & Schlosser, R.W. (2003). Use of technology to support independent spelling by students with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 292-302.
8.
Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Coleman, M.R. ( 2001). Middle schools: New trends and issues. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 24, 20-21.
10.
Cross, T., Cooke, N.L., Wood, W.W., & Test, D.W. ( 1999). Comparison of the effects of MAPS and ChoiceMaker on student self-determination skills. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 499-510.
11.
Davies, D.K., Stock, S.E., & Wehmeyer, M.L. (2003). A Palmtop computer-based intelligent aid for individuals with intellectual disabilities to increase independent decision making. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 182-193.
12.
Elder-Hinshaw, R., & Manset-Williamson, G. (2006). Engaging older students with reading disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 6-11.
13.
Friendly, M. ( 1983). Power computations for ANOVA designs. Retrieved from http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/sasmac/fpower.html
14.
Fullerton, A. ( 1995). Promoting self-determination for adolescents and young adults with autism. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 337-346.
15.
Garay, S.V. ( 2003). Listening to the voices of deaf students: Essential transition issues. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 44-48.
16.
Green, S.B., & Salkind, N.J. ( 2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-446, § 601.
18.
Izzo, M., & Lamb, P. ( 2002). Self-determination and career development: Skills for successful transition to postsecondary education and employment. Columbus: Ohio State University; Manoa: Center on Disability Studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa; Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Secondary Education and Transition .
19.
Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., Muller, K.E., & Nizam, A., (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. (3rd ed.) Pacific Grove : CA, Duxbury Press.
Martin, J.E., Dycke, J.V., Christense, W.R., Greene, B.A., Gardner, J.E., & Lovett, D.L. ( 2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299-316.
22.
Mason, C., Field, S., & Swailowsky, S. (2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70, 441-451.
23.
Mithaug, D.E., Campeau, P.L., & Wolman, J.M. ( 2003). Assessing self-determination prospects among students with and without disabilities. In D. E. Mithaug , D. K. Mithaug, M. Agran, J. E. Martin, & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self determined learning theory: Construction, verification, and evaluation (pp. 61-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
National Center on Secondary Education and Transition. ( 2004). Current challenges facing the future of secondary education and transition services for youth with disabilities in the United States. Retrieved July 2005 from http://www.ncset.org/publications/discussionpaper/NCSET_Discussion_Paper.pdf.
25.
Palmer, S.B., Wehmeyer, M.L., Gipson, K., & Agran, M. ( 2004). Promoting access to the general curriculum by teaching self-determination skills. Exceptional Children, 70, 427-439.
26.
Power, L.E., Turner, A., Westwood, D., Matuszewski, J., Wilson, R., & Phillips, A. ( 2001). TAKE CHARGE for the future: A controlled field-test of a model to promote student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 89-104.
27.
Raskind, M., & Higgins, E. ( 1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 141-156.
28.
Rose, D., & Meyer, A. ( 2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
29.
Sands, D., Spencer, K., Gliner, J., & Swaim, R. ( 1999). Structural equation modeling of student involvement in transition-related actions: The path of least resistance. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 17-27.
30.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
31.
Sherer, M., Maddox, J.E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacob, B., & Rogers, R.W. ( 1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and validation . Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
Test, D.W., Mason, C., Hughes, C., Konrad, M., Neale, M., & Wood, W.M. ( 2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 391-412.
34.
Thoma, C., Rogan, P., & Baker, S. ( 2001). Student involvement n transition planning: Unheard voices . Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 16-29.
35.
Wehmeyer, M.L. ( 1996). A self-report measure of self-determination for adolescents with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282-293.
36.
Wehmeyer, M.L. ( 2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Reexamining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 113-120.
37.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. ( 2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education , 34, 58-68.
38.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Garner, N.W., Yeager, D., & Lawrence, M. ( 2006). Infusing self-determination into 18-21 services for students with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A multi-stage, multiple component model. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities , 41, 3-13.
39.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Kelchner, K. ( 1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Silver Springs, MD: The Arc of the United States.
40.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S. ( 1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behaviors of adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632-642.
41.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Lawrence, M. ( 1995). Whose Future Is It Anyway? Promoting student involvement in transition planning. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 69-83.
42.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Lawrence, M. (in press). A national replication of a student-directed transition planning process: Impact on student knowledge of and perceptions about transition planning . Education and Treatment of Children.
43.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Lawrence, M., Kelchner, K., Palmer, S.B., Garner, N.W., & Soukup, J. ( 2004). Whose Future Is It Anyway? A student-directed transition planning process (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Beach Center on Disabilities.
44.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Palmer, S.B. ( 2003). Adult outcomes from students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131-144.
45.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S., Smith, S., Parent, W., Davies, D., & Stock, S. ( 2006). Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: A single-subject design meta analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24, 81-86.
46.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Palmer, S., Soukup, J.H., Garner, N., & Lawrence, M. ( 2007). Self-determination and student transition-planning knowledge and skills: Predicting involvement. Exceptionality, 15, 31-44.
47.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. ( 1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245-255.
48.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. ( 1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3-12.
49.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Smith, S., Palmer, S., & Davies, D. ( 2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 7-22.
50.
Wolman, J., Campeau, P., Dubois, P., Mithaug, D., & Stolarski, V. ( 1994). AIR Self-Determination Scale and user guide. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research.
51.
Zhang, D. ( 2001). The effect of Next S.T.E.P. instruction on the self-determination skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 121-132.
52.
Zhang, D., & Stecker, P.M. ( 2001). Student involvement in transition planning: Are we there yet?Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 293-303.
