The purpose of the current study was to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of state-level policies and practices concerning youth with disabilities in secondary day treatment and residential (DTR) schools, as well as juvenile correctional (JC) schools for committed youth. A survey of state directors of special education or their designees focused on curricula, assessment, and accountability in these school settings. State-level administrators from 49 states and the District of Columbia responded to mail and online surveys. They reported that approximately one third of DTR schools and half of JC schools used state or district curricula. Moreover, although most respondents noted that students should participate in state assessments, only one third noted that DTR or JC schools were supervised to a great extent to ensure the alignment of curricula and assessments. Implications for policy and practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Black, T.H., Brush, M.M., Grow, T.S., Hawes, J.H., Henry, D.S., & Hinke, R.W., Jr. (1996). Natural Bridge transition program follow-up study. Journal of Correctional Education, 47, 4-12.
2.
Bullis, M., & Yovanoff, P. ( 2006). Idle hands: Community employment experiences of formerly incarcerated youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders , 14, 71-85.
3.
Carman, G.O., Dorta, N., Kon, D., Martin, J., & Zarilli, M.A. ( 2004). Special education in residential treatment. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 381-394.
4.
Corbett, W.P., Clark, H.B., & Blank, W. ( 2002). Employment and social outcomes associated with vocational programming for youths with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 358-370.
5.
Cortiella, C. ( 2006). NCLB and IDEA: What parents of students with disabilities need to know and do. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
6.
David, J.L. ( 1994). Transforming state education agencies to support education reform. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
7.
Fink, A. ( 1995). How to analyze survey data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Gagnon, J.C. ( 2008). Local education agency curriculum, assessment, and accountability policies, practices, and philosophies for exclusionary school settings. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
Gagnon, J.C., Barber, B.R., & Van Loan, C.L. (2008). Juvenile correctional schools: Characteristics and approaches to curriculum. Unpublished manuscript.
10.
Gagnon, J.C., Haydon, T., & Maccini, P. ( 2008a). Juvenile correctional schools: Assessment and accountability policies and practices. Unpublished manuscript.
11.
Gagnon, J.C., Haydon, T., & Maccini, P. ( 2008b). Secondary day treatment and residential schools: Assessment and accountability policies and practices. Unpublished manuscript.
12.
Gagnon, J.C., & Leone, P.E. ( 2005). Elementary day and residential schools: Characteristics and entrance and exit policies. Remedial & Special Education , 26, 141-150.
13.
Gagnon, J.C., & Mayer, M. ( 2004). Educating juveniles with disabilities in correctional settings. In L. M. Bullock, R. A. Gable, & K. J. Melloy (Eds.), Fifth CCBD mini-library series (pp. 1-59). Arlington, VA: Council for Children With Behavioral Disorders .
14.
Gagnon, J.C., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2004). Curriculum, assessment, and accountability in day treatment and residential schools. Exceptional Children, 70, 263-283.
15.
Gagnon, J.C., Van Loan, C.L., & Barber, B.R. ( 2008). Secondary day treatment and residential schools for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Characteristics and approaches to curriculum. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
Griller-Clark, H., Rutherford, R.B., & Quinn, M.M. ( 2004). Practices in transition for youth in the juvenile justice system. In D. Cheney (Ed.), Transition of students with emotional or behavioral disabilities from school to community: Current approaches for positive outcomes (pp. 247-262). Arlington, VA: Division for Career Development and Transition/Council for Children With Behavioral Disorders .
17.
Hamman, E.T., & Lane, B. ( 2004). The roles of state departments of education as policy intermediaries: Two cases. Educational Policy, 18, 426-455.
18.
Heberlein, T.A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature . American Sociological Review, 43, 447-462.
19.
Horn, L.J., & Carroll, C.D. ( 1997, October). Confronting the odds: Students at risk and the pipeline to higher education (Statistical Analysis Report NELS:88/94). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics .
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 USC 1401 et seq. (1997).
21.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
22.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 34 CFR Parts 300 and 301 (2006).
23.
LeBlanc, L.A., & Pfannenstiel, J.C. (1991). Unlocking learning: Chapter 1 in correctional facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24.
Leone, P.E., & Meisel, S. ( 1997). Improving educational services for students in detention and confinement facilities. Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 17(1), 2-12.
25.
Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J.C. ( 2002). Perceptions and application of NCTM’s standards by special and general education teachers: Implications for practice for secondary students with emotional and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 325-344.
26.
Manna, P. ( 2006). Control, persuasion, and educational accountability: Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act. Educational Policy , 20, 471-494.
27.
McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (Eds.) (1997). Educating one & all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28.
McLaughlin, M.J. ( 1999). Access to the general education curriculum: Paperwork and procedure or redefining "special education." Journal of Special Education Leadership, 12(1), 9-14.
29.
Minnici, A., & Hill, D.D. ( 2007, May). Educational architects: Do state education agencies have the tools necessary to implement NCLB?Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
30.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (1999). Students with disabilities in juvenile justice programs: Directions for federal support (Proceedings of Project FORUM at National Association of State Directors of Special Education). Alexandria, VA: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED428492)
31.
National Information Center for Children and Youth With Disabilities. (1998). The IDEA amendments of 1997. News Digest, 26, 1-40.
32.
Newcomer, P.L., Barenbaum, E., & Pearson, N. ( 1995). Depression and anxiety in children and adolescents with learning disabilities, conduct disorders, and no disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 27-40.
33.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
34.
Oseroff, A., Oseroff, C.E., Westling, D., & Gessner, L.J. ( 1999). Teachers’ beliefs about maltreatment of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders , 24, 197-209.
35.
Palmer, E.A., & Barley, Z.A. ( 2008). What states can learn about standards and assessment systems from No Child Left Behind documents and interviews with Central Region assessment directors (Issues & Answers Report REL 2008-No. 036). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/central/pdf/REL_2008036.pdf
36.
Quinn, M.M., Rutherford, R.B., & Leone, P.E. ( 2001). Students with disabilities in correctional facilities . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED461958)
37.
Quinn, M.M., Rutherford, R.B., Leone, P.E., Osher, D.M., & Poirier, J.M. ( 2005). Youth with disabilities in juvenile corrections: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 71, 339-345.
38.
Ratcliffe, K.G., & Willard, D.T. ( 2006, Summer). NCLBA and IDEA: Perspectives from the field. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(3), 1-16.
39.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. ( 2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
40.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Twenty-first annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
41.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Twenty-sixth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
42.
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Twenty-seventh annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
43.
U.S. Office of Special Education Programs. ( 2008). Child find. Retrieved February 25, 2008 , from http://www.childfindidea.org/
44.
VanGetson, G.R., & Thurlow, M.L. ( 2007). Nearing the target in disaggregated subgroup reporting to the public on 2004-2005 assessment results (Technical Report 46). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
45.
Wagner, M. ( 1991). The benefits of secondary vocational education for young people with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
46.
Wagner M., & Davis, M. ( 2006). How are we preparing students with emotional disturbance for the transition to young adult-hood? Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders , 14, 86-98.
47.
Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A.J., Epstein, M.H., & Sumi, W.C. ( 2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79-96.
48.
Weatherly, R., & Lipsky, M. ( 1977). Street level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 171-197.
49.
Wolford, B.I. ( 2000). Juvenile justice education: Who is educating the youth?Richmond: Training Resource Center, Eastern Kentucky University.
50.
Yell, M.L., Shriner, J.G., & Katsiyannis, A. (2006). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 and IDEA regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(1), 1-24.
