The purpose of this study was to examine undergraduate conductors’ personal approaches to conducting practice, practice time allocation, and beliefs about their conducting abilities. Participants (N = 126) were undergraduate conductors enrolled in basic conducting courses at 17 NASM (National Association of Schools of Music)–accredited institutions. Our findings indicated that “patterns” and “dynamics” were the most practiced conducting behaviors. “Sing or hum musical lines” and “silent conducting practice” were the most used practice strategies. Through responses to open-ended items, participants shared that hand independence was the most challenging conducting skill and wished that it was discussed more by their conducting instructor, while “conducting patterns” was the skill that came most naturally. Undergraduate conductors practiced an average of 48 minutes per week across 2 to 3 days, and during practice sessions they used a score almost three fourths of the time. Implications for conducting practice and curricula are discussed.
BaughmanM. (2017). An examination of methods used to teach practice strategies in the college voice studio. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(2), 15–22. doi:10.1177/8755123315593325
2.
BaumgartnerC. M. (2014). An examination of music student teaching seminars at midwestern universities. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24(1), 51–64. doi:10.1177/1057083713494013
3.
BattistiF. L.GarofaloR. (1990). Guide to score study for the wind band conductor. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: Meredith Music.
4.
BergeeM. J. (2005). An exploratory comparison of novice, intermediate, and expert orchestra conductors. International Journal of Music Education, 23, 23–36. doi:10.1177/0255761405050928
5.
BoardmanS. M. (2000). A survey of the undergraduate instrumental conducting course in Region Seven of the National Association of Schools of Music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens.
6.
ByoJ. L.AustinK. R. (1994). Comparison of expert and novice conductors: An approach to the analysis of nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 11–34.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
DeCarboN. J. (1982). The effects of conducting experience and programmed materials on error-detection scores of college conducting students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 187–200. doi:10.2307/3345085
9.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/0022429408328851
10.
EggerJ. O.SpringerD. G. (2019). Music educators’ understanding and opinions of U.S. copyright law. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(3), 20–27. doi:10.1177/8755123318801064
11.
FeldmanE.ContzuisA.LutchM. (2016). Instrumental music education: Teaching with the musical and practical in harmony (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ForsytheJ. L.WoodsJ. R. (1983). The effects of conducting on the error detection ability of undergraduate and graduate instrumental conductors. Contributions to Music Education, 10, 27–31.
13.
GreenE. A.GibsonM. (2004). The modern conductor (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
14.
HarrisF.Jr. (2001). Conducting with feeling. Galesville, MD: Meredith Music.
15.
HartJ. T.Jr. (2019). The status of music education conducting curricula, practices, and values. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 28(2), 13–27. doi:10.1177/1057083718783464
16.
HunsbergerD.ErnstR. E. (1992). The art of conducting (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
JohnsonC. M.FredricksonW. E. (1995). The effect of aural commentary, written comments and behavioral self-assessment on conductor intensity. Journal of Band Research, 30(2), 27–38.
18.
JuslinP. N.PerssonR. S. (2002). Emotional communication. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 219–236). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
KaplowitzM. D.HadlockT. D.LevineR. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 94–101. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh006
20.
KimS. J. (2008). A collective case study of self-regulated learning in instrumental practice of college music majors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3327057)
21.
LabutaJ. A.MatthewsW. K. (2017). Basic conducting techniques (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
LaneJ. (2006). Undergraduate instrumental music education majors’ approach to score study in various musical contexts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 215–230. doi:10.1177/002242940605400305
23.
ManfredoJ. (2008). Factors influencing curricular content for undergraduate instrumental conducting courses. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 175, 45–62.
24.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359–375. doi:10.1177/0022429408317513
25.
MikszaP. (2012). The development of a measure of self-regulated practice behavior for beginning and intermediate instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 321–338. doi:10.1177/0022429411414717
26.
MikszaP.PrichardS.SorboD. (2012). An observational study of intermediate band students’ self-regulated practice behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 254–266. doi:10.1177/0022429412455201
27.
MorrisonS. J.PriceH. E.GeigerC.CornacchioR. (2009). The effect of conductor expressivity on ensemble performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 37–49. doi:10.1177/0022429409332679
28.
MorrisonS. J.SelveyJ. D. (2014). The effect of conductor expressivity on choral ensemble evaluation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 199, 7–18. doi:10.5406/bulcoursesmusedu.199.0007
29.
NapolesJ. (2013). The influences of presentation modes and conducting gestures on the perceptions of expressive choral performance of high school musicians attending a summer choral camp. International Journal of Music Education, 31, 321–330. doi:10.1177/0255761411434823
OrzolekD. C. (2002). The effect of imagery and movement exercises on the ability of students to conduct expressively. Journal of Band Research, 37(2), 61–78.
33.
PowellS. R. (2016). The influence of video reflection on preservice music teachers’ concerns in peer- and field-teaching settings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 487–507. doi:10.1177/0022429415620619
34.
RominesF. D. (2003). A survey of undergraduate instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Band Research, 38(2), 80–90.
35.
SilveyB. A. (2011). Undergraduate music majors’ perceptions of instrumental conducting curricula. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 27–38. doi:10.1177/1057083710387521
36.
SilveyB. A. (2013). The role of conductor facial expression in students’ evaluation of ensemble expressivity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 419–429. doi:10.1177/0022429412462580
37.
SilveyB. A.KoernerB. D. (2016). Effects of conductor expressivity on secondary school band members’ performance and attitudes toward conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64, 29–44. doi:10.1177/0022429415622451
38.
SilveyB. A.MontemayorM.BaumgartnerC. M. (2017). An observational study of score study practices among undergraduate instrumental music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65, 52–71. doi:10.1177/0022429416688700
39.
SilveyB. A.SpringerD. G.EubanksS. C. (2016). An examination of university conducting faculty members’ score study attitudes and practices. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 26(1), 82–95. doi:10.1177/1057083715616442
40.
SimsW. L.CassidyJ. W. (2016). The role of the dissertation in music education doctoral programs. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 25, 65–77. doi:10.1177/1057083715578285
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
