A National Analysis of High School Music Course Grades

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the grades given to students in U.S. public high school music courses and to examine the relationships between student characteristics, music course grades, and grades in additional subjects. Using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and latent profile analysis, I analyzed over 5,000 student transcripts from the U.S. Department of Education’s High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 that contained at least one grade in music. Fifty-six percent of all music grades were As, and 79% were As or Bs. Ensemble grades were generally higher than general music grades, which were more evenly distributed. Regression modeling revealed that ethnoracial identity, socioeconomic status, and having an individualized education program (IEP) were closely associated with students’ music grades, with students representing two or more minoritized populations being particularly unlikely to earn an A in music. Latent profile analysis illustrated that student demographics explained differences in music grades even among students with equivalent grades in other school subjects.

Keywords

music education grading assessment equity disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrahams

(2019). Assessment and critical pedagogy. In Brophy

T. S.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of assessment in music education (Vol. 2, pp. 307–323). Oxford.

Apple

M. W.

(1990). Ideology and curriculum (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181

Barrett

J. R.

(2006). Developing the professional judgment of preservice music teachers: Grading as a case in point. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 15(2), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/10570837060150020103

Bazan

D. E.

(2010). Planning and assessment practices of high school band directors. In Thompson

L. K.

Campbell

M. R.

(Eds.), Issues of identity in music education: Narratives and practices (pp. 109–125). Information Age.

Boyle

J. D.

Radocy

R. E.

(1987). Measurement and evaluation of musical experiences. Schirmer.

Bradby

Pedroso

Rogers

(2007). Secondary School Course Classification System: School Codes for the Exchange of Data (SCED) (NCES 2007-341). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007341.pdf

Brookhart

S. M.

(2011). Starting the conversation about grading. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 10–14. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/starting-the-conversation-about-grading

Brookhart

S. M.

Guskey

T. R.

Bowers

A. J.

McMillan

J. H.

Smith

J. K.

Smith

L. F.

Stevens

M. T.

Welsh

M. E.

(2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069

10.

Calarco

J. M.

(2014). Coached for the classroom: Parents’ cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 1015–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414546931

11.

Collins

L. M.

Lanza

S. T.

(2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis. Wiley.

12.

Conway

C. M.

Jeffers

(2004). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of assessment procedures in beginning instrumental music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 160, 16–25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319215

13.

Deci

E. L.

Koestner

Ryan

R. M.

(2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001

14.

Eisner

E. W.

(1994). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

15.

Elpus

Abril

C. R.

(2019). Who enrolls in high school music? A national profile of U.S. students, 2009–2013. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419862837

16.

Enders

C. K.

Keller

B. T.

Levy

(2018). A fully conditional specification approach to multilevel imputation of categorical and continuous variables. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000148

17.

Feldman

(2019). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin.

18.

Gonzales

W. G.

(2017). Assessment in secondary music classrooms: A replication study [Master’s thesis, University of Maryland]. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/19532.

19.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530

20.

Griffioen

(2018). Establishing a metacognitive model for instrumental music assessment: A case against non-musical assessment criteria. In Brophy

T. S.

Fautley

(Eds.), Context matters: Selected papers from the Sixth International Symposium on Assessment in Music Education (pp. 147–167). GIA.

21.

Guskey

T. R.

(2014). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting. Solution Tree.

22.

Guskey

T. R.

Jung

L. A.

(2013). Answers to essential questions about standards, assessments, grading, & reporting. Corwin.

23.

Guskey

T. R.

Link

L. J.

(2019). Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1555515

24.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Barron

K. E.

Elliot

A. J.

(1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1

25.

Harrison

S. D.

Lebler

Carey

Hitchcock

O’Bryan

(2013). Making music or gaining grades? Assessment practices in tertiary music ensembles. British Journal of Music Education, 30(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051712000253

26.

Heeringa

S. G.

West

B. T.

Berglund

P. A.

(2017). Applied survey data analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

27.

Ingels

S. J.

Pratt

D. J.

Herget

D. R.

Bryan

Fritch

L. B.

Ottem

Rogers

J. E.

Wilson

(2015). High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09) 2013 update and high school transcript (NCES 2015-036). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015036

28.

Keller

B. T.

Enders

C. K.

(2021). Blimp user’s guide (Version 3) [Computer software]. https://www.appliedmissingdata.com/multilevel-imputation.html

29.

Kohn

(2011). The case against grades. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 28–33. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/nov11/vol69/num03/The_Case_Against_Grades.aspx

30.

Kotora

E. J.

(2005). Assessment practices in the choral music classroom: A survey of Ohio high school choral music teachers and college choral methods professors. Contributions to Music Education, 32(2), 65–80. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127154

31.

LaCognata

J. P.

(2010). Current student assessment practices of high school band directors [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. https://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/817402531/.

32.

Lehman

P. R.

(1992). Assessing learning in the music classroom. NASSP Bulletin, 76(544), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659207654412

33.

Lehman

P. R.

(1998). Grading practices in music. Music Educators Journal, 84(5), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399129

34.

Link

L. J.

Guskey

T. R.

(2022). Is standards-based grading effective? Theory Into Practice, 61(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338

35.

Mantie

(2019). The philosophy of assessment in music education. In Brophy

T. S.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of assessment in music education (Vol. 1, pp. 33–55). Oxford.

36.

Marzano

R. J.

(2000). Transforming classroom grading. ASCD.

37.

McMillan

J. H.

(2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x

38.

McQuarrie

S. H.

Sherwin

R. G.

(2013a). Assessment in music education: Relationships between classroom practice and professional publication topics. Research and Issues in Music Education, 11(1), Article 6. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/rime/vol11/iss1/6

39.

McQuarrie

S. H.

Sherwin

R. G.

(2013b). Assessment in music education: Relationships between training, experience, and common practice. In Brophy

T. S.

Lehmann-Wermser

(Eds.), Music assessment across cultures and continents: The culture of shared practice (pp. 141–151). GIA.

40.

Muthén

B. O.

(2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In Marcoulides

G. A.

Schumacker

R. E.

(Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1–33). Erlbaum.

41.

O’Connor

(2018). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards (4th ed.). Corwin.

42.

O’Connor

Wormeli

(2011). Reporting student learning. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 40–44. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/nov11/vol69/num03/Reporting_Student_Learning.aspx

43.

Parkes

K. A.

(2020). What are we doing? Assessment quandaries of the 21st century. In Brophy

T. S.

Haning

(Eds.), Advancing music education through assessment: Honoring culture, diversity, and practice (pp. 17–33). GIA.

44.

Pellegrino

Conway

C. M.

Russell

J. A.

(2015). Assessment in performance-based secondary music classes. Music Educators Journal, 102(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432115590183

45.

Rauschenberg

(2014). How consistent are course grades? An examination of differential grading. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(92), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n92.2014

46.

Russell

J. A.

Austin

J. R.

(2010). Assessment practices of secondary music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409360062

47.

Shaw

B. P.

(2018). Music assessment for better ensembles. Oxford University Press.

48.

Shaw

B. P.

(2021). Concert grades and performance assessment in ensemble music. Music Educators Journal, 108(2), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321211060358

49.

Shaw

B. P.

(2022a). Music grades: Ubiquitous, consequential, and somehow under the radar. In Brophy

T. S.

Lehmann-Wermser

Haning

M. A.

(Eds.), Assessment in music education: Theory, practice, and policy (pp. 53–60). GIA.

50.

Shaw

B. P.

(2022b). A national analysis of music coursetaking, social-emotional learning, and academic achievement using propensity scores. Journal of Research in Music Education, 69(4), 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294211006415

51.

Shaw

B. P.

(2024). Standards-based grading in ensemble music. Music Educators Journal, 110(3), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/00274321231222901

52.

Sherman

C. P.

(2006). A study of current strategies and practices in the assessment of individuals in high school bands (Publication No. 3237098) [Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. https://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/305346305/

53.

St. Pierre

N. A.

Wuttke

B. C

. (2017). Standards-based grading practices among practicing music educators: Prevalence and rationale. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(2), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123315604468

54.

Stiggins

(2007). Assessment for learning: An essential foundation of productive instruction. In Reeves

(Ed.), Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 59–76). Solution Tree.

55.

Tracy

L. H.

(2002). Assessing individual students in the high school choral ensemble: Issues and practices (Publication No. 3065486) [Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertation & Theses. http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/275903196/

56.

Vaugeois

L. C.

(2019). Institutional music education and ranking as a form of subjectification: The merits of resistance and resilience. In Elliott

D. J.

Silverman

McPherson

G. E.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical and qualitative assessment in music education (pp. 27–50). Oxford.

57.

Wiliam

(2007). Content then process: Teacher learning communities in support of formative assessment. In Reeves

(Ed.), Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 183–204). Solution Tree.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB