The purpose of this study was to examine music teachers’ experiences with flow while performing and teaching music. A model with four flow antecedents (Challenge, Skills, Goal Clarity, and Feedback) and three dimensions of flow state (Absorption, Enjoyment, and Intrinsic Motivation) was adopted to investigate music teachers’ flow experiences in performing and teaching. Two hundred twenty-five music teachers completed the Flow in Music Performing and Teaching Scale, modified from Buil et al. The analyses revealed that the four flow antecedents in the proposed model explained a substantial amount of variance in music teachers’ flow state for both performing and teaching music settings (54.0% in performing, 34.7% in teaching). Participants’ open-ended descriptions of flow were also collected to further explore music teachers’ personal experiences with flow. The open-ended descriptions revealed that music teachers cited topics pertaining to Challenge, Skills, Absorption, Enjoyment, and Flow Disruptor when describing flow in performance. In contrast, they tended to cite topics pertaining to Feedback, Goal Clarity, and Group Flow when describing flow in teaching. Because Feedback and Goal Clarity appeared to be more closely associated with flow in teaching, executing lesson plans to accomplish goals while flexibly responding to students’ spontaneous feedback may elicit flow for teaching.
BakerF. A.SilvermanM. J.MacDonaldR. (2015). Reliability and validity of the Meaningfulness of Songwriting Scale (MSS) with adults on acute psychiatric and detoxification units. Journal of Music Therapy, 53(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thv020
2.
BakkerA. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
3.
BakkerA. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007
4.
BeardK. S.HoyW. K. (2010). The nature, meaning, and measure of teacher flow in elementary schools: A test of rival hypotheses. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(3), 426-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10375294
BuilI.CatalánS.MartínezE. (2018). Exploring students’ flow experiences in business simulation games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12237
7.
ClementsonC. J. (2019). A mixed methods investigation of flow experience in the middle school instrumental music classroom. Research Studies in Music Education, 41(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X18773093
8.
CohenS.BodnerE. (2018). The relationship between flow and music performance anxiety amongst professional classical orchestral musicians. Psychology of Music, 47, 420–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618754689
9.
ConwayC.ErosJ.PellegrinoK.WestC. (2010). Instrumental music education students’ perceptions of tensions experienced during their undergraduate degree. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(3), 260–275. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40043076
10.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
11.
CsikszentmihalyiM., (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
12.
DiazF. M.SilveiraJ. (2013). Dimensions of flow in academic and social activities among summer music camp participants. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411434455
13.
FritzB. S.AvsecA. (2007). The experience of flow and subjective well-being of music students. Horizons of Psychology, 16(2), 5–17.
14.
FullagarC. J.KnightP. A.SovernH. S. (2013). Challenge/skill balance, flow, and performance anxiety. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 62, 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00494.x
15.
GaggioliA.ChiricoA.MazzoniE.MilaniL.RivaG. (2017). Networked flow in musical bands. Psychology of Music, 45(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616665003
16.
HartE.Di BlasiZ. (2015). Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study. Psychology of Music, 43(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735613502374
17.
IuscaD. (2015). The relationship between flow and music performance level of undergraduates in exam situations: The effect of musical instrument. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 396–400.
18.
JacksonS. A.EklundR. C. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The Flow State Scale-2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.24.2.133
19.
JacksonS. A.MarshH. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
20.
JacksonS. A.MartinA. J.EklundR. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 561–587. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.5.561
21.
KangS.YooH. (2019). Music teachers’ psychological needs and work engagement as predictors of their well-being. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 221, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.221.0058
22.
MarshallR. P.III. (2013). Teacher flow and its relationship to school mindfulness and enabling school structure. (Publication No. 3612112) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
23.
MikszaP.TanL. (2015). Predicting collegiate wind players’ practice efficiency, flow, and self-efficacy for self-regulation: An exploratory study of relationships between teachers’ instruction and students’ practicing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415583474
24.
O’NeillS. (1999). Flow theory and the development of musical performance skills. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 129–134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40013260
25.
PeiferC.SchönfeldP.WoltersG.AustF.MargrafJ. (2020). Well done! Effects of positive feedback on perceived self-efficacy, flow and performance in a mental arithmetic task. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01008
26.
QuinnR. W. (2005). Flow in knowledge work: High performance experience in the design of national security technology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 610–641. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.610
27.
SaidT. (2018). Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity, European Centre for Research Training and Development UK, 6(1), 27–38.
ScheibJ. W. (2003). Role stress in the professional life of the school music teacher: A collective case study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345846
SindbergL. (2011). Alone all together –The conundrum of music teacher isolation and connectedness. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 189, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.189.0007
32.
SinnamonS.MoranA.O’ConnellM. (2012). Flow among musicians: Measuring peak experiences of student performers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411434931
33.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
34.
TanL.MikszaP. (2018). A cross-cultural examination of university students’ motivation toward band and academics in Singapore and the United States. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417735095
35.
TanL.SinH. X. (2021). Flow research in music contexts: A systematic literature review. Musicae Scientiae, 25(4), 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919877564
36.
TayK.TanL.GohW. (2021). A PRISMA review of collective flow experiences in music contexts. Psychology of Music, 49(3), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735619873389
37.
ValenzuelaR.CodinaN.Vicente PestanaJ. (2018). Self-determination theory applied to flow in conservatoire music practice: The roles of perceived autonomy and competence, and autonomous and controlled motivation. Psychology of Music, 46, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617694502
38.
WagonerC. L. (2015). Measuring music teacher identity: Self-efficacy and commitment among music teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 205, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.205.0027
39.
WrigleyW. J.EmmersonS. B. (2013). The experience of the flow state in live music performance. Psychology of Music, 41(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611425903
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
