In this study, we explored the ways in which listening tools within technology-mediated environments can facilitate children’s self-regulation of instrumental music learning between lessons. This interpretive multiple case study utilized a software application assigned for 22 weeks to a piano teacher and four students (ages 8–10). Data sources include student and teacher semistructured interviews and practice session observations. Self-regulated learning theory informed the recommended learning approach with technology and provided a lens for within- and cross-case thematic analysis. Study findings suggest that digital tools that provide accessible and customizable listening experiences can be used strategically to promote independent listening opportunities between lessons, in turn facilitating processes of aural familiarity and problem-solving. However, students’ self-regulatory development was also dependent on learning preferences and sustained teacher facilitation. The recommendations in this study can inform instrumental teachers about pedagogical approaches with technology, and the implications can contribute to the design of digital environments to support children’s instrumental learning.
AraújoM. V. (2016). Measuring self-regulated practice behaviours in highly skilled musicians. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614567554
2.
AzevedoR.MoosD.GreeneC.WintersJ.CromleyA. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
BarryN. H.HallamS. (2002). Practice. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 151–166). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138108.003.0010
5.
BartolomeS. J. (2009). Naturally emerging self-regulated practice behaviors among highly successful beginning recorder students. Research Studies in Music Education, 31(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X09103629
BrookJ.UpitisR. (2014). Can an online tool support contemporary independent music teaching and learning?Music Education Research, 17(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2014.969217
8.
BuckM. (2008). The efficacy of SmartMusic® assessment as a teaching and learning tool [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
9.
BurnardP. (2007). Reframing creativity and technology: Promoting pedagogic change in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.1.1.37/1
10.
CrawfordR. (2014). A multidimensional/non-linear teaching and learning model: Teaching and learning music in an authentic and holistic context. Music Education Research, 16(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.812627
11.
CrawfordR. (2017). Rethinking teaching and learning pedagogy for education in the twenty-first century: Blended learning in music education. Music Education Research, 19(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1202223
12.
CreechA. (2012). Interpersonal behaviour in one-to-one instrumental lessons: An observational analysis. British Journal of Music Education, 29(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026505171200006X
13.
CreswellJ. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
14.
DiasP.BritoR.RibbensW.DanielaL.RubeneZ.DreierM.GemoM.Di GioiaR.ChaudronS. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from “Gatekeepers” to “Scaffolders.”Global Studies of Childhood, 6(4), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610616676024
15.
DinsmoreD. L.AlexanderP. A.LoughlinS. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
16.
DukeA. D.ByoJ. L. (2012). Building musicianship in the instrumental classroom. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, Volume 1. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730810.013.0043
17.
DunnR. (2008). The effect of auditory, visual or kinesthetic perceptual strengths on music listening. Contributions to Music Education, 35, 47–78.
18.
EvansP. (2015). Self-determination theory: An approach to motivation in music education. Musicae Scientiae, 19(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864914568044
FletcherJ.PriceB.BranenL. (2010). Videotaping children and staff in natural environments: Gathering footage for research and teaching. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.2.219
21.
FrewenK. G. (2010). Effects of familiarity with a melody prior to instruction on children’s piano performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57(4), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409351178
22.
HallamS. (1997). Approaches to instrumental music practice of experts and novices: Implications for education. In JørgensenH.LehmannA. C. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 89–108). Norges musikkhøgskole.
23.
HallamS.RintaT.VarvarigouM.CreechA.PapageorgiI.GomesT.LanipekunJ. (2012). The development of practising strategies in young people. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 652–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612443868
24.
HatfieldJ.HalvariH.LemyreP. (2017). Instrumental practice in the contemporary music academy: A three-phase cycle of self-regulated learning in music students. Musicae Scientiae, 21(3), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916658342
25.
HendricksK. S. (2014). Changes in self-efficacy beliefs over time: Contextual influences of gender, rank-based placement, and social support in a competitive orchestra environment. Psychology of Music, 42(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612471238
26.
HenleyP. T. (2001). Effects of modeling and tempo patterns as practice techniques on the performance of high school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345868
27.
HewittM. (2001). The effects of modeling, self-evaluation, and self-listening on junior high instrumentalists' music performance and practice attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345614
28.
JørgensenH. (2004). Strategies for individual practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 85–103). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525356.003.0005
KorenmanL.PeynirciogluZ. (2007). Individual differences in learning and remembering music: Auditory versus visual presentation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500105
Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used by student musicians during music practice. Music Education Research, 10(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800701871439
33.
LinklaterF. (1997). Effects of audio- and videotape models on performance achievement of beginning clarinetists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(3), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345535
34.
LongM. (2011). The effectiveness of the SmartMusic® assessment tool for evaluating trombone student performance [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
35.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735605048012
McPhersonG. E.GabrielssonA. (2002). From sound to sign. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 99–115). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195138108.003.0007
38.
McPhersonG. E.NielsenS.RenwickJ. (2013). Self-regulation interventions and the development of music expertise. In BembenuttyH.ClearyT.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman (pp. 355–382). Information Age Publishing.
39.
McPhersonG. E.OsborneM.EvansP.MikszaP. (2019). Applying self-regulated learning microanalysis to study musicians’ practice. Psychology of Music, 47(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617731614
40.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800120089232
41.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective on developing performance skills. In ColwellR.WebsterP. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning, Volume 2: Applications (pp. 130–175). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199754397.003.0004
42.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
43.
MeyerE.AbramiP.WadeC.AslanO.DeaultL. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
44.
MikszaP. (2013). The effect of self-regulation instruction on the performance achievement, musical self-efficacy, and practicing of advanced wind players. Psychology of Music, 43(2), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735613500832
45.
MikszaP.PrichardS.SorboD. (2012). An observational study of intermediate band students’ self-regulated practice behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412455201
MitchellA. (2012). An auditory model facilitates intermediate musicians’ learning of advanced music [Master’s thesis, Southern Methodist University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
48.
MoosD.BondeC. (2016). Flipping the classroom: Embedding self-regulated learning prompts in videos. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9269-1
49.
MorrisonS. (2002). The use of recorded models in the instrumental rehearsal: Effects on ensemble achievement. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512330202000206
50.
NielsenS. G. (1999). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051799000364
51.
NielsenS. G. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800120089223
52.
PittsS.DavidsonJ.McPhersonG. E. (2000). Developing effective practise strategies: Case studies of three young instrumentalists. Music Education Research, 2(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800050004422
53.
RenwickJ.McPhersonG. E. (2002). Interest and choice: Student-selected repertoire and its effect on practising behaviour. British Journal of Music Education, 19(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051702000256
RohwerD. (2005). A case study of adult beginning instrumental practice. Contributions to Music Education, 32(1), 45–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24127235
56.
RostvallA.WestT. (2003). Analysis of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. Music Education Research, 5(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461380032000126319
57.
RouinfarA.AgraE.LarsonA.RebelloN.LoschkyL. (2014). Linking attentional processes and conceptual problem solving: Visual cues facilitate the automaticity of extracting relevant information from diagrams. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01094
58.
SavageJ. (2012). Driving forward technology's imprint on music education. In McPhersonG. E.WelchG. F. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education, Volume 1. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928019.013.0032
59.
SavageJ. (2017). Authentic approaches to music education with technology. In RuthmannA. S.MantieR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of technology and music education (pp. 555–566). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199372133.013.52
60.
UpitisR.AbramiP. (2017). Cadenza: An online tool for transforming music learning. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 18(1), 2261–2270. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.201
61.
UpitisR.BoeseK.AbramiP. (2017). Student experiences with a digital tool for music practice and learning. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 20(3), 2549–2560. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.224
62.
VarelaW. (2017). Age-related differences in musical self-regulation among Canadian music learners [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University]. Spectrum Research Repository.
63.
VoliotiG.WilliamonA. (2017). Recordings as learning and practising resources for performance: Exploring attitudes and behaviours of music students and professionals. Musicae Scientiae, 21(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916674048
64.
VygotskyL. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
WanL. A.GregoryS. (2018). Digital tools to support motivation of music students for instrumental practice. Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 11(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.11.1.37_1
WiseS. (2018). The future just happened—or did it? Teacher’s views and uses of digital technology. In McPhailG.ThorpeV.WiseS. (Eds.), Educational change and the secondary school music curriculum in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 27–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315109602
69.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
70.
ZelenakM. S. (2015). Measuring the sources of self-efficacy among secondary school music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414555018
71.
ZhengL. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9426-9
72.
ZhukovK. (2015). Exploring the role of technology in instrumental skill development of Australian higher education music students. Australian Journal of Music Education, 2, 66–77.
73.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
