We examined collective efficacy beliefs, including levels of within-group agreement and correlation with performance quality, of instrumental chamber ensembles (70 musicians, representing 18 ensembles). Participants were drawn from collegiate programs and intensive summer music festivals located in the northwestern and western regions of the United States. Individuals completed a five-item survey gauging confidence in their group’s performance abilities; each ensemble’s aggregated results represented its collective efficacy score. Ensembles provided a video-recorded performance excerpt that was rated by a panel of four string specialists. Analyses revealed moderately strong levels of collective efficacy belief and uniformly high within-group agreement. There was a significant, moderately strong correlation between collective efficacy belief and within-group agreement (rs = .67, p < .01). We found no relationship between collective efficacy belief and performance quality across the total sample, but those factors correlated significantly for festival-based ensembles (rs = .82, p < .05). Reliability estimates suggest that our collective efficacy survey may be suitable for use with string chamber ensembles. Correlational findings provide partial support for the theorized link between efficacy belief and performance quality in chamber music settings, suggesting the importance for music educators to ensure that positive efficacy beliefs become well founded through quality instruction.
AbrilC. R.GaultB. M. (2008). The state of music in secondary schools: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 68–81. doi:10.1177/0022429408317516
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
3.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–317). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
6.
BongM. (2006). Asking the right question: How confident are you that you could successfully perform these tasks? In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 287–305). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
7.
BugosJ. A.KocharS.MaxfieldN. (2016). Intense piano training on self-efficacy and physiological stress in aging. Psychology of Music, 44, 611–624. doi:10.1177/0305735615577250
8.
CiorbaC. R. (2006). The creation of a model to predict jazz improvisation achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text database. (Publication No. 3243107)
9.
ClarkJ. C. (2010). Examining possible influences of string students’ self-efficacy and musical background characteristics on practice behaviors. String Research Journal, 1, 55–73. doi:10.1177/194849921000100104
10.
DavidsonJ. W.GoodJ. M. M. (2002). Social and musical co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music, 30, 186–201. doi:10.1177/0305735602302005
11.
DavidsonJ. W.KingE. C. (2004). Strategies for ensemble practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 105–122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
13.
FeltzD. L.LirggC. D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557–564. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.557
14.
HardinA. M.FullerM. A.ValacichJ. S. (2006). Measuring group efficacy in virtual teams: New questions in an old debate. Small Group Research, 37, 65–85. doi:10.1177/1046496405284219
15.
HendricksK. S. (2009). Relationships between the sources of self-efficacy and changes in competence perceptions of music students during an all-state orchestra event (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text database. (Publication No. 3362920)
16.
HendricksK. S. (2014). Changes in self-efficacy beliefs over time: Contextual influences of gender, rank-based placement, and social support in a competitive orchestra environment. Psychology of Music, 42, 347–365. doi:10.1177/0305735612471238
17.
HendricksK. S. (2016). The sources of self-efficacy: Educational research and implications for music. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 32–38. doi:10.1177/8755123315576535
18.
HendricksK. S.SmithT. D.LegutkiA. R. (2016). Competitive comparison in music: Influences upon self-efficacy beliefs by gender. Gender and Education, 28, 918–934. doi:10.1080/09540253.2015.1107032
19.
HewittM. P. (2015). Self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and music performance of secondary-level band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 298–313. doi:10.1177/0022429415595611
20.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
KlassenR. M.UsherE. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: Recent research and emerging directions. In UrdanT. C.KarabenickS. A. (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation (Vol. 16A, pp. 1–33). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
23.
LatimerM. E.BergeeM. J.CohenM. L. (2010). Reliability and perceived pedagogical utility of a weighted music performance assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 168–183. doi:10.1177/0022429410369836
24.
LittleB. L.MadiganR. M. (1997). The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517–534. doi:10.1177/1046496497284003
25.
MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R.LinnenbrinkE. A. (2002). Motivation and achievement. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 348–372). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007). Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 6–17. doi:10.1177/002242940705500102
27.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2013). The role of the conductor’s goal orientation and use of shared performance cues on collegiate instrumentalists’ motivational beliefs and performance in large musical ensembles. Psychology of Music, 41, 630–646. doi:10.1177/0305735612441738
28.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2016). Group cohesion, motivational climate, and collective efficacy beliefs in community college and university bands. Journal of Band Research, 51(2), 1–17.
29.
McCormickJ.McPhersonG. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31, 37–51. doi:10.1177/0305735603031001322
30.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34, 322–336. doi:10.1177/0305735606064841
31.
MikszaP. (2015). The effect of self-regulation instruction on the performance achievement, musical self-efficacy, and practicing of advanced wind players. Psychology of Music, 43, 219–243. doi:10.1177/0305735613500832
32.
MikszaP.TanL. (2015). Predicting collegiate wind players’ practice efficiency, flow, and self-efficacy for self-regulation: An exploratory study of relationships between teachers’ instruction and students’ practicing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 162–179. doi:10.1177/0022429415583474
33.
MyersN. D.FeltzD. L.ShortS. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: A longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 126–138. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.2.126
34.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543
35.
RamseyP. H. (1989). Critical values for Spearman’s rank order correlation. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14, 245–253. doi:10.3102/10769986014003245
36.
RitchieL.WilliamonA. (2010). Measuring distinct types of musical self-efficacy. Psychology of Music, 39, 328–344. doi:10.1177/0305735610374895
37.
RitchieL.WilliamonA. (2011). Primary school children’s self-efficacy for music learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 146–161. doi:10.1177/0022429411405214
38.
RitchieL.WilliamonA. (2012). Self-efficacy as a predictor of musical performance quality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 334–340. doi:10.1037/a0029619
39.
SchmidtC. P. (2007). Intrinsic-mastery motivation in instrumental music: Extension of a higher order construct. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 173, 7–23.
40.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02591.x
41.
WatsonK. E. (2010). The effects of aural versus notated instructional materials on achievement and self-efficacy in jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 240–259. doi:10.1177/0022429410377115
42.
Wehr-FlowersE. (2006). Differences between male and female students’ confidence, anxiety, and attitude toward learning jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 337–349. doi:10.2307/4139755
43.
ZaccaroS. J.BlairV.PetersonC.ZazanisM. (1995). Collective efficacy. In MadduxJ. (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 305–328). New York, NY: Springer.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
