This article presents new findings regarding group processes in chamber ensembles. Following work by Young and Colman, Butterworth, and Murnighan and Conlon on the string quartet, a questionnaire was distributed to wind quintets throughout the UK. A total of 55 respondents, representing 20 ensembles, participated in the study. Quantitative and qualitative data revealed information about group formation, personnel recruitment and the use of deputies, leadership, seating positions, verbal and non-verbal communication, conflict, rehearsing and performing, audience effects, social aspects and administration. The current study focuses on the role of the horn player in the quintet and explores players’ attitudes and perceptions of their individual careers, quintet repertoire, concert promoters and string quartets as an opposing medium. Results are discussed with reference to the existing quartet studies and to social psychological theory of group dynamics.
Abeles, H.F.
and Porter, S.Y. (1978) ‘The Sex-Stereotyping of Musical Instruments’, Journal of Research in Music Education26: 65-75.
2.
Allmendinger, J.
, Hackmann, J.R. and Lehman, E.V. (1996) ‘American Musics: Life and Work in Symphony Orchestras’, The Musical Quarterly80 (2): 194-219.
3.
Allport, F.H.
(1924) Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
4.
Alverno, L.
(1987) ‘Music Student Quartets and Psychotherapy’, Medical Problems of Performing Artists2: 75ff.
5.
Argyle, M.
(1994) The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour, 5th edn.London: Penguin.
6.
Atik, Y.
(1995) ‘People Factors in the Performing Arts’, Performing Arts Medicine News3 (3): 7-12.
7.
Bales, R.F.
and Bargatta, E.F. (1955) ‘Size of Group as a Factor in the Interaction Profile’, in A.P. Hareet al. (eds) Small Groups in Social Interaction, pp. 396-413. New York: Knopf.
8.
Bass, B.M.
and Klubeck, S. (1952) ‘Effects of Seating Arrangement on Leaderless Group Discussions’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology47: 724-727.
9.
Baumeister, R.F.
(1984) ‘Choking under Pressure: Self-Consciousness and Paradoxical Effects of Incentives on Skillful Performance’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46: 610-620.
10.
Blum, D.
(1986) The Art of Quartet Playing: The Guarneri Quartet in Conversation with David Blum. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
Butterworth, T.
(1990) ‘Detroit String Quartet’, in J.R. Hackman (ed.) Groups that Work (and Those that Don’t), pp. 207-224. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Davidson, J.W.
(1997) ‘The Social in Musical Performance’, in D.J. Hargreaves and A.C. North (eds) The Social Psychology of Music, pp. 209-228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
Davidson, J.W.
and Good, J.M.M. (1997) ‘Social Processes in Western Art Chamber Music: Some Aspects of the Social Psychology of the String Quartet’, in A. Gabrielsson (ed.) Proceedings of the Third Triennial ESCOM Conference, pp. 329-332. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.
14.
Davidson, J.W.
and Good, J.M.M. (2002) ‘Social and Musical Co-ordination between Members of a String Quartet: An Exploratory Study’, Psychology of Music30 (2): 186-201.
15.
Delzell, J.K.
and Leppla, D.A. (1992) ‘Gender Associations of Musical Instruments and Preferences of Fourth Grade Students for Selected Instruments’, Journal of Research in Music Education40: 93-103.
16.
Faulkner, R.R.
(1973) ‘Orchestra Interaction: Some Features of Communication and Authority in an Artistic Organisation’, Sociological Quarterly14: 147-157.
17.
Forsyth, D.R.
(1990) Group Dynamics, 2nd edn.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
18.
Frederickson, J.
and Rooney, J.F. (1993) A Sociological Study of the Freelance Classical Musician - In the Pits. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
19.
Kemp, A.E.
(1996) The Musical Temperament: Psychology and Personality of Musicians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Levine, S.
and Levine, R. (1996) ‘Why They’re Not Smiling: Stress and Discontent in the Orchestral Workplace’, Harmony (Forum of the Symphony Orchestra Institute), Vol. 2, April [www.soi.org].
21.
Miles, M.B.
and Huberman, M.A. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Murnighan, J.K.
and Conlon, D.E. (1991) ‘The Dynamics of Intense Work Groups: A Study of British String Quartets’, Administrative Science Quarterly36: 165-186.
23.
O’Neill, S.A.
(1997) ‘Gender and Music’, in D.J. Hargreaves and A.C. North (eds) The Social Psychology of Music, pp. 46-66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
Oppenheim, A.N.
(1966) Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. London: Heinemann.
25.
Reynolds, V.
(1997) The Horn Handbook. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press.
26.
Rounds, D.
(1999) The Four and the One: In Praise of String Quartets. Fort Bragg, CA: Lost Coast Press.
27.
Secrist-Schmedes, B.
(1996) Wind Chamber Music: Winds with Piano and Woodwind Quintets: An Annotated Guide. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
28.
Shaw, M.
(1971) Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Small, C.
(1987) ‘Performance as Ritual: Sketch for an Enquiry into the True Nature of a Symphony Concert’, in A.L. White (ed.) Lost in Music: Culture, Style and the Musical Event. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30.
Steinhardt, A.
(1998) Indivisible by Four: A String Quartet in Pursuit of Harmony. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
31.
Stoneham, M.
, Gillaspie, J.E. and Clark, D.L. (1997) Wind Ensemble Sourcebook and Biographical Guide. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
32.
Young, V.M.
and Colman, A.M. (1979) ‘Some Psychological Processes in String Quartets, Psychology of Music7: 12-16.
