In the present study, relationships between two components of self-regulation (self-efficacy and self-evaluation) and gender, school level, instrument family, and music performance were examined. Participants were 340 middle and high school band students who participated in one of two summer music camps or who were members of a private middle school band program. Students indicated their level of self-efficacy for playing a musical excerpt before performing it and then self-evaluated their performance immediately afterward. Findings suggest that there is a strong and positive relationship between self-efficacy and both music performance and self-evaluation. There was also a strong negative relationship between self-evaluation calibration bias and music performance, indicating that as music performance ability increased, students were more underconfident in their self-evaluations. Gender differences were found for self-evaluation calibration accuracy, as female students were more accurate than males at evaluating their performances. Middle school males were more inclined than females to overrate their self-efficacy and self-evaluation as compared to their actual music performance scores. These gender differences were reversed for high school students. There were no other statistically significant findings.
AitchisonR. A. (1995). The effects of self-evaluation techniques on the musical performance, self-evaluation accuracy, motivation, and self-esteem of middle school instrumental music students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10A), 3875.
2.
AndradeH. L.WangX.DuY.AkawiR. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 287–301. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.4.287-302
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
4.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In UrdanF. P. T. (Ed.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
5.
BergeeM. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19-27. doi:10.2307/3345476
6.
BergeeM. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612. doi:10.2307/3345425
7.
ChenP. P. (2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics students. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 79–92. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.003
8.
ChenP. P.ZimmermanB. J. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs of middle-school mathematics students. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 221–244. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.221-244
9.
DuckworthA. LSeligmanM. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208.
10.
FaulknerR.DavidsonJ. W.McPhersonG. E. (2010). The value of data mining in music education research and some findings from its application to a study of instrumental learning during childhood. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 212–230. doi:10.1177/0255761410371048
11.
GaravaliaL. S.GredlerM. E. (2002). An exploratory study of academic goal setting, achievement calibration and self-regulated learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 221–230.
12.
GuilfordJ. P. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
HansenJ. T.BubanyS. T. (2008). Do self-efficacy and ability self-estimate scores reflect distinct facets of ability judgments?Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 41, 66–88.
14.
HeJ.FreemanL.A. (2010). Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 203–212.
15.
HewittM. P. (2002). Self-evaluation tendencies of junior high instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 215–226. doi:10.2307/3345799
16.
HewittM. P. (2005). Self-evaluation accuracy among high school and middle school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 148–161. doi:10.2307/3345515
17.
HewittM. P. (2011). The impact of self-evaluation instruction on student self-evaluation, music performance, and self-evaluation accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 6–20. doi:10.1177/0022429410391541
18.
HuangC. (2013). Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. EuropeanJournal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0097-y
19.
JaccardJ.BeckerM. A. (1997). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20.
KostkaM. J. (1997). Effects of self-assessment and successive approximations on “knowing” and “valuing” selected keyboard skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 273–281. doi:10.2307/3345586
21.
LabuhnA. S.ZimmermanB. J.HasselhornM. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 173–194. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2
22.
LeutwylerB. (2009). Metacognitive learning strategies: Differential development patterns in high school. Metacognition Learning, 4, 111–123. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9037-5
23.
McCormickJ.McPhersonG. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31, 37–51. doi:10.1177/0305735603031001322
24.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34, 322–336. doi:10.1177/0305735606064841
25.
MeeceJ. L.PainterJ. (2012). Gender, self-regulation, and motivation. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 339–368). New York, NY: Rutledge.
26.
MeierS.McCarthyP. R.SchmeckR. R. (1984) Validity of self-efficacy as a predictor of writing performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 107–120. doi:10.1007/BF01173038
27.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116–129. doi:10.2307/3345434
28.
NielsenS. G. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32, 418–431. doi:10.1177/0305735604046099
29.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
30.
PajaresF.KranzlerJ. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426–443. doi:10.1006/ceps.1995.1029
31.
PajaresF.MillerM. (1997). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical problem solving: Implications of using different forms. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 213–228. doi:10.1080/00220973.1997.9943455
32.
PintrichP. R.De GrootV. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
33.
RamdassR.ZimmermanB. (2008). Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 18–41.
34.
ReadyD. D.LoGerfoL. F.BurkamD. T.LeeV. E. (2005). Explaining girls’ advantage in kindergarten literacy learning: Do classroom behaviors make a difference?Elementary School Journal, 106, 21–38. doi:10.1086/496905
35.
RitchieL.WilliamonA. (2013). Measuring musical self-regulation: Linking processes, skills, and beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(1), 106–117. doi:10.11114/jets.v1i1.81
36.
SalomonG. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.76.4.647
37.
SaundersT. C.HolahanJ. M. (1997). Criteria-specific rating scales in the evaluation of high school instrumental performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 259–272. doi:10.2307/3345585
38.
SchunkD. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
39.
SchunkD. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_2
40.
SchunkD. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In MadduxJ. E. (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 281–303). New York, NY: Plenum.
41.
SchunkD. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382. doi:10.3102/00028312033002359
42.
SchunkD. H.ErtmerP. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: Goals and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 251–260. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.91.2.251
43.
SchunkD. H.GunnT. P. (1985). Modeled importance of task strategies and achievement beliefs: Effects on self-efficacy and skill development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 247–258. doi:10.1177/0272431685052008
44.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2004). Self-efficacy in education revisited. Empirical and applied evidence. In McInerneyD. M.EttenS. V. (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 115–138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
45.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In WentzelK.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
47.
WhiteP. H.KjelgaardM. M.HarkinsS. G. (1995). Testing the contribution of self-evaluation to goal-setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 69–79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.69
48.
WilliamsM. (1995). Highbridge excursions. Van Nuys, CA: Alfred.
49.
WilliamsT.WilliamsK. (2010). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 453–466. doi:10.1037/a0017271
50.
WillinghamW. W.ColeN. S. (Eds.). (1997). Gender and fair assessment: Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
WrigleyW. J.EmmersonS. B. (2013). The experience of the flow state in live music performance. Psychology of Music, 41, 292–305. doi:10.1177/0305735611425903
52.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998a). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86. doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
53.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998b). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Guilford.
54.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating, grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.51
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
