This study was designed to examine the decision-making process for keeping or cutting the music program in one selected public school district. Lekbery School District, in the Detroit suburb of Lekbery, Michigan, had not made extreme cuts to the music program in over 10 years, nor had it specifically targeted the music program when budgets cuts did occur. Qualitative data collected through interviews and documents indicated that Lekbery Schools District’s administrators had committed to offering a well-rounded education to all of their students and that music education played a large part in that education. For decision making regarding funding and support for music education, decision makers considered (a) their personal values and philosophies of music education, (b) the values and demands of the community, (c) the quality of teaching that Lekbery could afford and provide, (d) the aesthetic and utilitarian purposes of keeping music education in the curriculum, (e) the economic value that music added, and (f) how the program contributed to the overall image of the school district.
AbrilC. (2009). School music education in the United States. Diskussion Musikpadogogik, 43, 46–53.
2.
AbrilC.GaultB. (2006). The state of music in the elementary school: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 6–20. doi:10.1177/002242940605400102
3.
AbrilC.GaultB. (2008). The state of music in secondary schools: The principal’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 68–81. doi:10.1177/0022429408317516
4.
CoyshS. (2005). Thriving music programs in a harsh climate: Two case studies (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 974437851)
FieldsW. M. (1982). Factors affecting the reduction or elimination of instrumental music in public schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 751707731)
10.
FitzpatrickK. (2006). The effect of instrumental music participation and socioeconomic status on Ohio fourth-, sixth-, and ninth-grade proficiency test performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 73–84. doi:10.1177/002242940605400106
11.
FosterG. (2002). Tools to promote arts advocacy. American Music Teacher, 52(1), 87.
GerrityK. (2007) No child left behind: Determining the impact of policy on music education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3262133)
14.
GillespieR.HamannD. (1998). The status of orchestra programs in the public schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 75–86. doi:10.2307/3345761
15.
GillespieR.HamannD. (2010). An investigation of new string programs established in American schools between 1999 and 2009. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
IidaG. (1991). Selected characteristics of successful high school band programs (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 744392411)
17.
KeiperS.SadeneB. A.PerskyH. R.KuangM. (2009). The nation’s report card: Arts 2008 music and visual Arts (NCES 2009-488). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
18.
KinneyD. W. (2008). Selected demographic variables, school music participation, and achievement test scores of urban middle schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 145–161. doi:10.1177/0022429408322530
19.
LehmanP. (1990). Music in today’s schools: A rationale and commentary. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
20.
LehmanP. (1992). Winning and losing in the struggle to reform education. Design for Arts in Education, 93. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com.
21.
MajorM. (June2010). How they decide: A case study examining the decision making process for keeping or cutting music in a selected K–12 public school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3424622)
MarzanoR. J.KendallJ. S.CicchinelliL. F. (1999). What Americans believe students should know: A survey of U.S. adults. Aurora, CO: Midcontinent Regional Education Laboratory.
24.
McMurrerJ. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. A report: From the capital to the classroom. Year 5 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
25.
McMurrerJ. (2008). Instructional time in elementary schools: A closer look at changes for specific subjects. A report: From the capital to the classroom. Year 5 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/html/
Music for All Foundation. (2004). The sound of silence: The unprecedented decline of music education in California public schools. Retrieved from http://www.musicforall.org/jpopup.html
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
PittmanA. N. (2003). An analysis of selected exemplary music programs with implication for public school music education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (UMI No. 3116769)
32.
RuppertS. S. (2006). Critical evidence: How the arts benefit student achievement. Washington, DC: National Assembly of State Arts Agencies.
33.
ScheibJ. W. (2003). Role stress in the professional life of the school music teacher: A collective case study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 124–136. doi:10.2307/33445846
34.
SchultzJ.R. (2006). Nice but not necessary? Educational leaders’ stories of the arts in an era of accountability (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1147184711)
35.
SowellT. (2007). Basic economics: A common sense guide to the economy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
WallickM. D. (1998). A comparison study of the Ohio proficiency test results between fourth-grade string pullout students and those of matched ability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 239–247. doi:10.2307/3345626
40.
WoodworthK. R.GallagherH. A.GuhaR. (2007). An unfinished canvas: Arts education in California. Taking stock of policies and practices. Summary report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
41.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
