The purpose of this study was to examine and compare self-estimates, peer estimates, and actual time preservice teachers spent talking in rehearsal. Participants (N = 32) conducted a short choral rehearsal and estimated their teacher talk (expressed as a percentage of total rehearsal time). Their peers also reported estimates, and the researchers took data on actual time. Later, participants observed themselves on video and used stopwatches to compute teacher talk percentages on the same session. Participants then conducted a second rehearsal and again estimated their teacher talk percentage. Results indicated that by the second rehearsal, participants reduced their teacher talk by about half, and their estimates became closer to actual time. Significant differences were discovered between all estimates from the first rehearsal and the second rehearsal. Self-analysis through videotapes appears to be a useful tool for reducing teacher talk and increasing estimation accuracy.
AitchisonR. A. (1995). The effects of self-evaluation techniques on the musical performance, self-evaluation accuracy, motivation, and self-esteem of middle school instrumental music students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9602998)
2.
BergeeM. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19–27. doi:10.2307/3345476
3.
BergeeM. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612. doi:10.2307/3345425
4.
BergeeM. J.Cecconi-RobertsL. (2002). Effects of small-group peer interaction on self-evaluation of music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 256–268. doi:10.2307/3345802
5.
BrendellJ. K. (1996). Time use, rehearsal activity, and student off-task behavior during the initial minutes of high school choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 6–14. doi:10.2307/3345409
6.
ByoJ. L. (1990). Recognition of intensity contrasts in gestures of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 157–163. doi:10.2307/3345179
7.
ByoJ. L.BrooksR. (1994). A comparison of junior high musicians’ and music educators’ performance evaluations of instrumental music. Contributions to Music Education, 21, 26–38.
8.
CaldwellW. M. (1980). A time analysis of selected musical elements and leadership behaviors of successful high school choral conductors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8020349)
9.
ColwellC. M. (1995). Effect of teaching setting and self-evaluation on teacher intensity behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 6–21. doi:10.2307/3345788
10.
DunnD. E. (1997). Effect of rehearsal hierarchy and reinforcement on attention, achievement, and attitude of selected choirs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 547–567. doi:10.2307/3345422
11.
ForsytheJ. L. (1977). Elementary student attending behavior as a function of classroom activities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 228–239. doi:10.2307/3345307
12.
Freed-GarrodJ. (1999). Assessment in the arts: Elementary-aged students as qualitative assessors of their own and peers’ musical compositions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 139, 50–63. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318948
13.
GoolsbyT. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286–303. doi:10.2307/3345442
14.
GoolsbyT. W. (1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers’ preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 174–187. doi:10.2307/3345722
15.
GrecheskyR. N. (1985). An analysis of non-verbal and verbal conducting behaviors and their relationships to expressive musical performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8513459)
16.
GreenfieldD. (1978). Evaluation of music therapy practicum competencies. Journal of Music Therapy, 15, 15–20.
17.
HewittM. P. (2002). Self-evaluation tendencies of junior high instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 215–226. doi:10.2307/3345799
18.
HewittM. P. (2005). Self-evaluation accuracy among high school and middle school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 148–161. doi:10.1177/ 002242940505300205
19.
KostkaM. J. (1984). An investigation of reinforcements, time use, and student attentiveness in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 113–122. doi:10.2307/3344978
20.
KostkaM. J. (1997). Effects of self-assessment and successive approximations on “knowing” and “valuing” selected keyboard skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 273–281. doi:10.2307/3345586
21.
MadsenC. K.DukeR. A. (1985a). Observation of approval/disapproval in music: Perception versus actual classroom events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214. doi:10.2307/3344807
22.
MadsenC. K.DukeR. A. (1985b). Perception of approval/disapproval in music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 85, 119–130. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40317948
23.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1983). Attending behavior as a function of in-class activity in university music classes. Journal of Music Therapy, 20, 30–38.
24.
MadsenC. K.MadsenC. H. (1972). Selection of music listening or candy as a function of contingent versus noncontingent reinforcement and scale singing. Journal of Music Therapy, 9, 190–198.
25.
MadsenC. K.StandleyJ. M.CassidyJ. W. (1989). Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85–92. doi:10.2307/3344700
26.
MadsenC. K.StandleyJ. M.ByoJ. L.CassidyJ. W. (1992). Assessment of effective teaching by instrumental music student teachers and experts. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 10, 20–24. Retrieved from http://upd.sagepub.com/content/10/2/20.full.pdf
27.
MooreR. S. (1976). Effect of differential teaching techniques on achievement attitude and teaching skills of preservice elementary music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 129–141. doi:10.2307/3345156
28.
MooreR. S. (1987). Effects of age, sex, and activity on children’s attentiveness in elementary school music classes. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 26–31). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
29.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116–129. doi:10.2307/3345434
30.
NapolesJ. (2007). The effect of duration of teacher talk on the attitude, attentiveness, and performance achievement of high school choral students. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 11, 22–29.
31.
NapolesJ. (2008). Relationships among instructor, self, and peer evaluations of undergraduate music education majors’ microteaching experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 82–91. doi:10.1177/0022429408323071
32.
NapolesJ.BowersJ. (2010). Differential effects of instructor feedback vs. self- observation analysis on music education majors’ increase of specific reinforcement in choral rehearsals. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 183, 39–47. http://bcrme.press.illinois.edu/183/napoles.html
33.
PontiousM. F. (1982). A profile of rehearsal techniques and interaction of selected band conductors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8302966)
34.
PrickettC. A. (1987). The effect of self-monitoring on the rate of a verbal mannerism of song teachers. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 125–134). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
35.
RosenthalR. K. (1985). Improving teacher effectiveness through self-assessment: A case study. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 3, 17–21. doi:10.1177/ 875512338500300205
36.
SherillM. H. (1986). An analytical study of videotaped rehearsal and conducting techniques of selected junior and senior high school band conductors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
37.
SimsW. L. (1985). Effects of peer feedback on pre-service teachers’ self-evaluation of videotaped teaching. Florida Journal of Teacher Education, 115–124.
38.
SpradlingR. L. (1985). The effect of timeout from performance on attentiveness and attitude of university band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 123–137. doi:10.2307/3344732
39.
ThurmanV. L. (1977). A frequency and time description of selected rehearsal behaviors used by five choral directors (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 7726765)
40.
WagnerM. J.StrulE. P. (1979). Comparisons of beginning versus experienced elementary music educators in the use of teaching time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 113–125. doi:10.2307/3344897
41.
WittA. C. (1986). Use of class time and student attentiveness in secondary instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 34–42. doi:10.2307/3344796
42.
YarbroughC. (1987). The relationship of behavioral self-assessment to the achievement of basic conducting skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 183–189. doi:10.2307/3344960
43.
YarbroughC.PriceH. E. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity and teacher behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209–217. doi:10.2307/3344994
