This study was designed to determine a pitch skill hierarchy for string sight-reading, to determine the effects of key on string sight-reading achievement, and to determine the validity of a tonal pattern system as a measurement of melodic sight-reading skill for string players. High school string students (n = 94) obtained a mean score of 27.28 out of 31 on a modified version of the Vocal Sight-Reading Inventory. Success rates ranging from .99 to .72 were established for 31 pitch skills, grouped into eight tonal categories. Significant differences were found between skills appearing in the keys of D and E, with 11 of 31 skills obtaining significantly differing results by key. A .95 correlation between note-by-note and skill-based scoring systems indicates that skill-based scoring is a valid measurement of string players’ sight-reading of tonal pitch skills within a melodic context. Researchers should explore whether these pitch skills hold their relative difficulty level with less accomplished players and between instrument types, establish a hierarchy for rhythm skills, further investigate the effect of key, and identify anxiety levels for sight-reading when the consequences of performance quality vary.
AndersonJ. (1981). Effects of tape-recorded aural models on sight-reading and performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 23–30. doi:10.2307/334467610.2307/3344676
2.
BoyleJ. (1970). The effect of prescribed rhythmical movements on the ability to read music at sight. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18, 307–308. doi:10.2307/334449810.2307/3344498
3.
BoyleJ.LucasK. (1990). The effect of context on sightsinging. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 106, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318858
4.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
5.
DavidsonL.ScrippL. (1988). A developmental view of sightsinging. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 2, 10–23.
6.
DavidsonL.ScrippL.MeyaardJ. (1988). Sightsinging ability: A quantitative and qualitative point of view. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 2, 51–68.
7.
DelzellJ. K.RohwerD. A.BallardD. E. (1999). Effects of melodic pattern difficulty and performance experience on ability to play by ear. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(1), 53–63. doi:10.2307/334582810.2307/3345828
8.
DemorestS. (1998). Improving sight-singing performance in the choral ensemble: The effect of individual testing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 182–192. doi:10.2307/334562210.2307/3345622
9.
DemorestS.MayW. (1995). Sight-singing instruction in the choral ensemble: Factors related to individual performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 156–167. doi:10.2307/334567610.2307/3345676
10.
ElliottC. A. (1982). The relationships among instrumental sight-reading ability and seven selected predictor variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30(1), 5–14. doi:10.2307/334486210.2307/3344862
11.
FarnumS. E. (1969). The Farnum string scale. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard.
12.
FerrinC. E. (2004). Music reading calisthenics: The effect of a consistent regimen of sightreading and the effect of educational kinesiology upon the music sightreading skills of high school music students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 4693.
13.
FineP.BerryA.RosnerB. (2006). The effect of pattern recognition and tonal predictability on sight-singing ability. Psychology of Music, 34, 431–447. doi:10.1177/030573560606715210.1177/0305735606067152
14.
GordonE. (1997). Learning sequences in music. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
15.
GregoryT. B. (1972). The effect of rhythmic notation variables on sight reading errors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20, 462–468. doi:10.2307/334380410.2307/3343804
16.
GromkoJ. E. (2004). Predictors of music sight-reading ability in high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(1), 6–15. doi:10.2307/334552110.2307/3345521
17.
GrutzmacherP. A. (1987). The effect of tonal pattern training on the aural perception, reading recognition, and melodic sight-reading achievement of first-year instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35(3), 171–181. doi:10.2307/334495910.2307/3344959
18.
HenryM. (1999). The development of an individual vocal sight-reading inventory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 683A.
19.
HenryM. (2001). The development of a vocal sight-reading inventory. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150, 21–35. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319097
20.
HenryM. (2003). A comparison of testing formats for vocal sight reading. Texas Music Education Research, pp. 2–9.
21.
HenryM. (2011). The effect of pitch and rhythm difficulty on vocal sight-reading performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 72–84. doi:10.1177/002242941039719910.1177/0022429410397199
22.
HenryM.DemorestS. (1994). Individual sight-singing achievement in successful choral ensembles. UPDATE: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13, 4–8.
23.
KazezD. (1992). Solfege drills. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 6, 19–34.
24.
KillianJ. (1991). The relationship between sightsinging accuracy and error detection in junior high singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 216–224. doi:10.2307/334472110.2307/3344721
25.
KillianJ. N.HenryM. L. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 51–65. doi:10.1177/00224294050530010510.1177/002242940505300105
26.
MacKnightC. (1975). Music reading ability of beginning wind instrumentalists after melodic instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(1), 23–34. doi:10.2307/334520010.2307/3345200
27.
MannR. G. (1991). The use of Kodaly instruction to develop the sight-reading skills of undergraduate flute students (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2063.
28.
McPhersonG. E. (1994). Factors and abilities influencing sightreading skills in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 217–231. doi:10.2307/334570110.2307/3345701
29.
McPhersonG. E.BaileyM.SinclairK. E. (1997). Path analysis of a theoretical model to describe the relationship among five types of musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 103–129. doi:10.2307/334546910.2307/3345469
30.
NelsonR. (1988). Sightsinging for children—too little, too late?Journal of Church Music, 30, 14–15.
31.
ScofieldW. (1980). The construction and validation of a method for the measurement of the sight-singing abilities of high school and college students (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41, 03A.
32.
ScottT. (1996). The construction of a holistic, criterion-referenced sightsinging test for high school sopranos based on the voluntary national standards for music education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
33.
StengerS. (1997). The effect of mneumonic devices on a mathematical method of rhythm reading instruction (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kansas, Lawrence.
34.
StiversJ. D. (1973). A reliability and validity study of the Watkins–Farnum Performance Scale (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
35.
TownsendB. G. (1992). Relationships between sight-reading ability of college freshmen wind instrumentalists and wind instrumentalists and music experience, band experience, and music aptitude (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 4258.
36.
TuckerD. (1969). Factors related to musical reading ability of senior high school students participating in choral groups (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 2427A.
37.
WalkerR. (1992). Auditory perception and musical behavior. In ColwellR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 344–348). New York, NY: Schirmer.
38.
WatkinsJ.FarnumS. (1962). The Watkins–Farnum performance scale. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard.
39.
WheelerM. R. (1993). A comparative analysis of melodic and rhythmic music reading skills of percussion and wind instrument students in selected North Carolina schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 3469.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
