The purpose of this study was to develop and test the construct validity and reliability of a self-report measure of self-regulated practice behaviors for beginning and intermediate instrumentalists. A questionnaire was designed to assess the motive, method, behavior, time management, and social influences dimensions of the theoretical model of self-regulation proposed by McPherson and Zimmerman. The questionnaire’s construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, and a preliminary assessment of predictive validity was estimated by correlating the measure with self-reported practice habits. The measure’s reliability in regard to internal consistency and consistency over time was assessed as well. The sample consisted of middle school band students in grades 6 to 8 (N = 302). Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a model including factors representing the dimensions self-efficacy, method/behavior combined, time management, and social influences was the best fit. Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest reliability results indicated good to excellent consistency across all self-regulation subscales, with coefficients ranging from .76 to .90. Significant correlations (p < .001) between the self-regulation subscales and self-reported practice habits (i.e., time spent practicing, average daily practice efficiency, percentage of time spent on formal practice) provided preliminary evidence of predictive validity of the measure.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34, 535–558. doi:10.1177/030573560606717010.1177/0305735606067170
2.
BarryN. H. (1991). A comparison of advanced student musicians’ and professional musicians’ practice attitudes and strategies. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 3, 32–41.
3.
BarryN. H.HallamS. (2002). Practice. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance–creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 151–165). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BoyleJ. D.DeCarboN. J.JordanD. J. (1995). Middle/junior high school band directors’ views regarding reasons for student dropouts in instrumental music. Retrieved from University of South Florida, Music Department, website: http://arts.usf.edu/music/rpme/boyledec.htm
5.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research: Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: Guilford.
6.
CiabattariW. (2004). Motivating high school students to practice: A comparison of student and teacher perceptions. Contributions to Music Education, 31(2), 43–55.
7.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how—Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321. doi:10.1177/002242940832885110.1177/0022429408328851
8.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.36310.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
9.
GrusonL. (1988). Rehearsal skill and musical competence: Does practice make perfect? In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 91–112). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
10.
GuzzoR. A.YostP. R.CampbellR. J.SheaG. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106.
11.
HallamS. (1997a). Approaches to the instrumental music practice of experts and novices: Implications for education. In JorgensenH.LehmanA. C. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice. Oslo, Norway: Norges Musikkhogskole.
12.
HallamS. (1997b). The development of memorization strategies in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 14, 87–97. doi:10.1017/S026505170000346610.1017/S0265051700003466
13.
HallamS. (2001a). The development of expertise in young musicians: Strategy use, knowledge acquisition, and individual diversity. Music Education Research, 3, 7–23. doi:10.1080/1461380002002991410.1080/14613800020029914
14.
HallamS. (2001b). The development of metacognition in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 27–39. doi:10.1017/S026505170100012210.1017/S0265051701000122
15.
HamannD. L.LucasK. A.McAllisterP.TeachoutD. (1998). An investigation into the factors contributing to individual practice. Journal of Band Research, 34, 59–68.
16.
HoweM. J. A.SlobodaJ. A. (1991). Young musicians’ accounts of significant influences in their early lives: 1. The family and the musical background. British Journal of Music Education, 8, 39–52. doi:10.1017/S026505170000805610.1017/S0265051700008056
17.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118
18.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (2006). LISREL for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
KelleyE. L. (1927). The interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers, NY: World.
21.
MacNamaraA.HolmesP.CollinsD. (2006). The pathway to excellence: The role of psychological characteristics in negotiating the challenges of musical development. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 285–302. doi:10.1017/S026505170600706610.1017/S0265051706007066
22.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1981). The effect of a distraction index on improving practice attentiveness and musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 66, 46–52.
23.
ManturzewskaM. (1979). Results of psychological research on the process of music practicing and its effective shaping. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 59, 59–61.
24.
ManturzewskaM. (1990). A biographical study of the life-span development of professional musicians. Psychology of Music, 18, 112–139. doi:10.1177/030573569018200210.1177/0305735690182002
25.
McCormickJ.McPhersonG. E. (2003). The role of self-efficacy in a musical performance examination: An exploratory structural equation analysis. Psychology of Music, 31, 37–51. doi:10.1177/030573560303100132210.1177/0305735603031001322
26.
McPhersonG. E. (1997). Cognitive strategies and skill acquisition in musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 64–71.
27.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 33, 5–35. doi:10.1177/030573560504801210.1177/0305735605048012
28.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (1999). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of musical practice. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 98–102.
29.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2000). The contribution of motivational factors to instrumental performance in a music examination. Research Studies in Music Education, 15, 31–39. doi:10.1177/1321103X000150010510.1177/1321103X0001500105
30.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34, 322–336. doi:10.1177/030573560606484110.1177/0305735606064841
31.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169–186. doi:10.1080/1461380012008923210.1080/14613800120089232
32.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 327–347). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
MikszaP. (2006). Self-regulatory and motivational variables in the music practice of junior high band students. Contributions to Music Education, 33(2), 9–26.
34.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359–375. doi:10.1177/002242940831751310.1177/0022429408317513
35.
MikszaP. (2009). An investigation of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in the context of instrumental music. In ThompsonL. K.CampbellM. R. (Eds.), Research perspectives: Thought and practice in music education (pp. 81–100). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
36.
MikszaP. (2011). Relationships among impulsivity, achievement goal motivation, and the music practice of collegiate wind players. Psychology of Music, 31, 50–67. doi:10.1177/030573561036199610.1177/0305735610361996
37.
NielsenS. G. (2004). Strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in instrumental and vocal individual practice: A study of students in higher music education. Psychology of Music, 32, 418–431. doi:10.1177/0305735604046099
38.
PintrichP.DeGrootE. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.3310.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
39.
PintrichP.SmithD.GarciaT.McKeachieW. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 810–813. doi:10.1177/001316449305300302410.1177/0013164493053003024
40.
PittsS.DavidsonA.McPhersonG. (2000a). Developing effective practice strategies: Case studies of three young instrumentalists. Music Education Research, 2, 45–56. doi:10.1080/1461380005000442210.1080/14613800050004422
41.
PittsS.DavidsonA.McPhersonG. (2000b). Models of success and failure in instrumental learning: Case studies of young players in the first 20 months of learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 146, 51–69.
42.
RenwickJ. M.McPhersonG. E. (2002). Interest and choice: Student-selected repertoire and its effect on practicing behavior. British Journal of Music Education, 19, 173–188. doi:10.1017/S026505170200025610.1017/S0265051702000256
43.
RohwerD.PolkJ. (2006). Practice behaviors of eighth-grade instrumental musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 350–362. doi:10.1177/00224294060540040710.1177/002242940605400407
44.
SchmidtC. P. (2005). Relations among motivation, performance achievement, and music experience variables in secondary instrumental music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 134–147. doi:10.2307/334560310.2307/3345603
45.
SchmidtC. P. (2007). Intrinsic-mastery motivation in instrumental music: Extension of a higher order construct. Bulletin for Council of Research in Music Education, 173, 7–23.
46.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 287–309. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02591.x10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02591.x
47.
SosniakL. A. (1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 19–67). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
48.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49.
WarnockE. C. (2005). Determining attraction to beginning band participation. Journal of Band Research, 40, 43–59.
50.
WilliamonA.ValentineE. (2000). Quantity and quality of music practice as predictors of performance quality. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 353–376. doi:10.1348/00071260016187110.1348/000712600161871
51.
ZimmermanB. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–311. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-510.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5
52.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 32, 73–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_310.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_3
53.
ZimmermanB. J.BanduraA.Martinez-PonsM. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676. doi:10.2307/116326110.2307/1163261
54.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628. doi:10.3102/0002831202300461410.3102/00028312023004614
55.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 283–290. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.28410.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
56.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.5110.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
