Turkish migrants are the largest national group in Germany. Nevertheless, neither in music psychology research nor in intercultural research can empirical data on the music preferences of Turkish-German primary schoolchildren in the migrational context be found. This study thus examined the music preference responses of children with Turkish language backgrounds, who were at the end of primary school education, to music examples representing the differences between occidental and oriental music systems. A total of 267 children participated in an investigation in the city of Ludwigshafen am Rhein that involved primary schools that had relatively high and relatively low numbers of children with migrational backgrounds. The data analysis indicated interesting coherences between the children’s family language backgrounds and their music preferences. In the context of migration, however, the children’s responses represented varied possibilities of locating in a local, transnational, or global music culture.
AbrilC. R.FlowersP. J. (2007). Attention, preference, and identity in music listening by middle school students of different linguistic backgrounds. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 204–219.
2.
BackhausK.ErichsonB.PlinkeW.WeiberR. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Methods of multivariate analysis. A practical introduction] (11th ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
3.
BartholomewD. J.MoustakiI.GalbraithJ. I. (2008). Analysis of multivariate social science data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
4.
BehneK.-E. (1986). Hörertypologien. Zur Psychologie des jugendlichen Musikgeschmacks [Listener typologies. To a psychology of young people’s music tastes]. Regensburg, Germany: Gustav Bosse.
5.
BehneK.-E. (1997). Musikästhetik–III. Musikalische Urteilsbildung [Aesthetics of music III. Musical judgment]. In FinscherL. (Ed.), Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Sachteil Bd. [Music in history and the present. Subject index] 6 (pp. 998–1011). Kassel, Germany: Bärenreiter.
6.
BrittinR. V. (2000). Children’s preference for sequenced accompaniments: The influence of style and perceived tempo. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 237–248.
7.
de BlockL.BuckinghamD. (2007). Global children, global media: Migration, media and childhood. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillian.
8.
ElliottD. J. (1995). Music matters: A new philosophy of music education. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
FinckeG. (2009). Abgehängt, chancenlos, unwillig? Eine empirische Reorientierung von Integrationstheorien zu MigrantInnen der zweiten Generation in Deutschland [Left far behind, chanceless, unwilling? An empirical reorientation from integration theories about second generation migrants in Germany]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
10.
GanzeboomH. B.TreimanD. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201–239.
11.
GarofaloR. (1993). Whose world, what beat: The transnational music industry, identity, and cultural imperialism. World of Music, 35(2), 16–32.
12.
GembrisH.SchellbergG. (2007). Die Offenohrigkeit und ihr Verschwinden bei Kindern im Grundschulalter [The “open-earedness” and it’s disappearance at primary school children]. In AuhagenW.BullerjahnC.HögeH. (Eds.), Musikpsychologie: Musikalische Sozialisation im Kindes- und Jugendalter [Psychology of music: Musical socialization of children and adolescents] (pp. 71–92). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
13.
GogolinI. (2006). Chancen und Risiken nach PISA—über Bildungsbeteiligung von Migrantenkindern und Reformvorschläge [Chances and risks after PISA - about migrant children’s educational participation and reform proposals]. In AuernheimerG. (Ed.), Schieflagen im Bildungssystem. Die Benachteiligung der Migrantenkinder [Imbalances in the educational system. The disadvantages of migrant children] (2nd ed., pp. 33–50). Wiesbaden: VS.
14.
GogolinI.Krüger-PotratzM. (2006). Einführung in die Interkulturelle Pädagogik [Introduction to intercultural pedagogy]. Opladen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
15.
GogolinI.YağmurK. (2003). Erläuterungen zur Methode der Untersuchung Explanation of the investigation method. In FürstenauS.GogolinI.YağmurK. (Eds.), Mehrsprachigkeit in Hamburg. Ergebnisse einer Sprachenerhebung an den Grundschulen in Hamburg [Multilingualism in Hamburg. Results of an investigation of language practices at primary schools in Hamburg] (pp. 33–43). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
16.
GordonE. E. (2003). Learning sequences in music: Skill, content, and patterns. A music learning theory. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.
17.
GreerR. D.DorowL. G.RandallA. (1974). Music listening preferences of elementary school children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 284–291.
18.
HanP. (2006). Theorien zur internationalen Migration [Theories of international migration]. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.
19.
HargreavesD. J. (1982). Preference and prejudice in music: A psychological approach. Popular Music and Society, 8(3&4), 13–18.
20.
HargreavesD. J. (1986). The developmental psychology of music. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HargreavesD. J.MacDonaldR.MiellD. (2005). How do people communicate using music? In MiellD.MacDonaldR.HargreavesD. J. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 1–25). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22.
HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C.TarrantM. (2006). Musical preference and taste in childhood and adolescence. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), The child as musician (pp. 135–154). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23.
JanssenJ.LaatzW. (2007). Statistische Datenanalyse mit SPSS für Windows [Statistical analysis with SPSS for Windows] (6th ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
KopiezR.LehmannM. (2008). The “open-earedness” hypothesis and the development of age-related aesthetic reactions to music in elementary school children. British Journal of Music Education, 25, 121–138.
26.
KoserK. (2007). International migration: A very short introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27.
LamontA. (2009). Music in the school years. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology (pp. 235–248). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28.
LamontA.GreasleyA. (2009). Musical preferences. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology (pp. 160–168). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
29.
LeBlancA. (1982). An interactive theory of music preference. Journal of Music Therapy, 19, 28–45.
30.
LeBlancA.ColmanJ.McCraryJ.SherrillC.MalinS. (1988). Tempo preferences of different age music listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 156–168.
31.
LeBlancA.SimsW. L.SiivolaC.ObertM. (1996). Music style preferences of different age listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 49–59.
32.
MardiaK. V.KentJ. T.BibbyJ. M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic Press.
33.
MorrisonS. J.DemorestS. M.StambaughL. A. (2008). Enculturation effects in music cognition. The role of age and music complexity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 118–129.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1997). Liking for musical styles. Musicae Scientiae, 1(1), 109–128.
36.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37.
PriesL. (2008). Die Transnationalisierung der sozialen Welt [The transnationalization of the social world]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
38.
ReinhardK.ReinhardU. (1984). Musik der Türkei [The music of Turkey] (Vols. 1–2). Wilhelmshaven, Germany: Heinrichshofen.
39.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.
40.
SchenderaC. F. (2008). Regressionsanalyse mit SPSS [Regression analysis with SPSS]. München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
41.
SchenderaC. F. (2010). Clusteranalyse mit SPSS. Mit Faktorenanalyse [Cluster analysis with SPSS. Including Factor analysis]. München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
42.
SchützA.LuckmannT. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt [The Structures of the Life-World]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
43.
SchwippertK.BosW.LankesE.-M. (2003). Heterogenität und Chancengleichheit am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich [Heterogeneity and equal opportunities at the end of fourth grade in international comparison]. In BosW.LankesE.-M.PrenzelM.SchwippertK.WaltherG.ValtinR. (Eds.), Erste Ergebnisse aus IGLU. Schülerleistungen am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich [First results from IGLU. Pupil’s performances at the end of the fourth grade in international comparison] (pp. 265–302). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
TeicherJ. M. (1997). Effect of multicultural music experience on preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 415–427.
46.
TeoT.HargreavesD. J.LeeJ. (2008). Musical preference, identification, and familiarity. A multicultural comparison of secondary students from Singapore and the United Kingdom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 18–32.
47.
TreumannK. P.MeisterD. M.SanderU.BurkatzkiE.HagedornJ.KämmererM.. . . WegenerC. (2007). Medienhandeln Jugendlicher. Mediennutzung und Medienkompetenz. Bielefelder Medienkompetenzmodel [Media acting of young people. Media use and media competency. The Bielefelder competency model]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.
48.
VolkT. M. (1998). Music, education, multiculturalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
ZillmannD. (1988a). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340.
50.
ZillmannD. (1988b). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage. In DonohewL.SypherH. E.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
ZillmannD.BryantJ. (1985). Affect, mood, and emotion as determinants of selective exposure. In ZillmannD.BryantJ.(Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 158–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
