This investigation replicates previous research into K–12 students’ responses to mid-20th-century art music. The study extends that research to include undergraduates and graduates as well as an additional group of graduate students who had taken a 20th-century music class. Children’s responses showed remarkable consistency and indicated that younger children gave higher mean liking ratings than did older students. Kindergarten and third-grade youngsters preferred all but two of the excerpts compared to their older counterparts. There appeared to be a large difference between younger students’ responses compared to 6th- and 9th-grade students, who were more similar to undergraduate and graduate music students, while 12th graders generally gave the lowest responses. Preferences for the group of graduate students who studied 20th-century music were not significantly higher than those of graduate students who had not had an additional course. These results corroborate previous research that illustrates differences in preference between different ages of listeners.
BerlyneD. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. New York, NY: Wiley.
2.
Boal-PalheirosG. (1998). Audicao musical no 2° Ciclo do Ensino Basic° [Musical hearing in the 2nd stage of basic education]. Fundamentos da Educacdo Musical–Associacdo Brasileira de Educaciio Musical, 4, 26–33.
3.
Boal-PalheirosG.HargreavesD. J. (2001). Listening to music at home and at school. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 103–118. doi:10.1017/S0265051701000213
4.
Boal-PalheirosG.IlariB.MonteiroF. (2006). Children’s responses to 20th century “art” music, in Portugal and Brazil. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 588–595).
5.
DroeK. D. (2006). Music preference and music education: A review of literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 24(2), 23–32. doi:10.1177/87551233060240020103
6.
FinnasL. (1989). How can musical preferences be modified? A research review. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 102, 1–58. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318309
7.
GardnerH. (1973). Children’s sensitivity to musical styles. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 19, 67–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23083794
8.
GembrisH. (2002) The development of musical abilities. In ColwellR. J.RichardsonC. (Eds), New handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 487–508). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
GinocchioJ. F. (2008). Fifth-grade listeners’ music style preferences: A ranking of contemporary popular music styles and comparison to Leblanc, 1979. Contributions to Music Education, 35, 9–21.
10.
HargreavesD. J. (1982). The development of aesthetic reactions to music. Psychology of Music, Special Issue, 51–54.
11.
HargreavesD. J. (1986). The developmental psychology of music. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HargreavesD. J.ComberC.ColleyA. (1995). Effects of age, gender, and training on musical preferences of British secondary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 242–250. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345639
13.
HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (1999). Developing concepts of musical style. Musicae Scientiae, 3, 193–216. doi: 10.1177/102986499900300203
14.
KillianJ. N. (1990). Effect of model characteristics on musical preference of junior high students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 115–123. doi:10.2307/3344931
15.
KopiezR.LehmannM. (2008). The “open-earedness” hypothesis and the development of age-related aesthetic reactions to music in elementary school children. British Journal of Music Education, 25, 121–138. doi:10.1017/S0265051708007882
16.
LeBlancA. (1980). Outline of a proposed model of sources of variation in musical taste. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 6, 29–34. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40317580
17.
LeBlancA. (1982). An interactive theory of musical preference. Journal of Music Therapy, 19, 28–45. doi:10.1093/jmt/19.1.28
18.
LeBlancA. (1987). The development of music preference in children. In PeeryJ. C.PeeryI. W. (Eds.), Music and child development (pp. 134–157). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
19.
LeBlancA.SimsW.SiivolaC.ObertM. (1996). Music style preferences of different age music listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 49–59. doi:10.2307/3345413
20.
MadsenC. K. (1987). Background music: Competition for focus of attention. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 315–325). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
21.
MadsenC. K.DiazF. M.GeringerJ. M. (2009, November). Music as competition for focus of attention. Paper presented at the American Music Therapy Association National Conference, San Diego, CA.
22.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2000/2001). A focus of attention model for meaningful listening. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 147, 103–108. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319396
23.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (2010). Kindergarten through 12th grade student responses to 20th century music: Investigating a model for meaningful listening. In HolgersenS.NielsenF. (Eds.), RAIME: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium (pp. 183–192). Copenhagen, Denmark: Aarhus University.
24.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M.MadsenK. (2009). Adolescent musicians’ perception of conductors within musical context. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 16–25. doi:10.1177/0022429409333352
25.
MadsenC. KWolfeD. E. (1979). The effect of interrupted music and incompatible responses on bodily movement and music attentiveness. Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 17–30. doi:10.1093/jmt/16.1.17
26.
McCraryJ. (1993). Effects of listeners’ and performers’ race on music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 200–211. doi:10.2307/3345325
27.
MontgomeryB. (1978). Basic aural discrimination: Third grade children’s perception of changes in music (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 7822195)
28.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (Eds.). (1997). The social psychology of music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
RussellP. A. (1997). Musical tastes and society. In HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp. 141–158). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30.
SlobodaJ. A.JuslinP. N. (Eds.). (2001). Psychological perspectives on music and emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
TemkoP. M. (1971). The perception of pitch predominance in selected musical examples of avant-garde composers (1945-1961) (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 7209218)
32.
ZillmannD.GanS. (1997). Musical taste in adolescence. In HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp. 161–187). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
